{"title":"分析了基于mpc的轨迹规划器的功能缺陷和触发条件,改进了SOTIF","authors":"Georg Schildbach , Mirko Conrad","doi":"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Automated and autonomous driving has made a significant technological leap over the past decade. In this process, the complexity of algorithms used for vehicle control has grown significantly. Model Predictive Control (MPC) is a prominent example, which has gained enormous popularity and is now widely used for vehicle motion planning and control. However, safety concerns restrict its practical application, especially since traditional procedures of functional safety, with its universal standard ISO<!--> <!-->26262, reach their limits. Concomitantly, the new aspect of safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF) has moved into the center of attention, whose standard, ISO<!--> <!-->21448, has only been released in 2022. Experience with SOTIF, however, is low and few case studies are available in industry and research. Hence, this paper aims to make two main contributions: (1) an analysis of the SOTIF, with a certification guidance, for a generic MPC-based trajectory planner and (2) an interpretation and application of the generic procedures described in ISO<!--> <!-->21448 to a research-based case study, with the goal of determining the functional insufficiencies (FIs) and triggering conditions (TCs). Particular novelties of the paper include an approach for the out-of-context development of SOTIF-related elements (SOTIF-EooC), a compilation of important FIs and TCs for a MPC-based trajectory planner, and an optimized safety concept based on the identified FIs and TCs for the MPC-based trajectory planner.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50615,"journal":{"name":"Control Engineering Practice","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 106461"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of functional insufficiencies and triggering conditions to improve the SOTIF of an MPC-based trajectory planner\",\"authors\":\"Georg Schildbach , Mirko Conrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conengprac.2025.106461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Automated and autonomous driving has made a significant technological leap over the past decade. In this process, the complexity of algorithms used for vehicle control has grown significantly. Model Predictive Control (MPC) is a prominent example, which has gained enormous popularity and is now widely used for vehicle motion planning and control. However, safety concerns restrict its practical application, especially since traditional procedures of functional safety, with its universal standard ISO<!--> <!-->26262, reach their limits. Concomitantly, the new aspect of safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF) has moved into the center of attention, whose standard, ISO<!--> <!-->21448, has only been released in 2022. Experience with SOTIF, however, is low and few case studies are available in industry and research. Hence, this paper aims to make two main contributions: (1) an analysis of the SOTIF, with a certification guidance, for a generic MPC-based trajectory planner and (2) an interpretation and application of the generic procedures described in ISO<!--> <!-->21448 to a research-based case study, with the goal of determining the functional insufficiencies (FIs) and triggering conditions (TCs). Particular novelties of the paper include an approach for the out-of-context development of SOTIF-related elements (SOTIF-EooC), a compilation of important FIs and TCs for a MPC-based trajectory planner, and an optimized safety concept based on the identified FIs and TCs for the MPC-based trajectory planner.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"volume\":\"164 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106461\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Control Engineering Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125002230\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Control Engineering Practice","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967066125002230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of functional insufficiencies and triggering conditions to improve the SOTIF of an MPC-based trajectory planner
Automated and autonomous driving has made a significant technological leap over the past decade. In this process, the complexity of algorithms used for vehicle control has grown significantly. Model Predictive Control (MPC) is a prominent example, which has gained enormous popularity and is now widely used for vehicle motion planning and control. However, safety concerns restrict its practical application, especially since traditional procedures of functional safety, with its universal standard ISO 26262, reach their limits. Concomitantly, the new aspect of safety of the intended functionality (SOTIF) has moved into the center of attention, whose standard, ISO 21448, has only been released in 2022. Experience with SOTIF, however, is low and few case studies are available in industry and research. Hence, this paper aims to make two main contributions: (1) an analysis of the SOTIF, with a certification guidance, for a generic MPC-based trajectory planner and (2) an interpretation and application of the generic procedures described in ISO 21448 to a research-based case study, with the goal of determining the functional insufficiencies (FIs) and triggering conditions (TCs). Particular novelties of the paper include an approach for the out-of-context development of SOTIF-related elements (SOTIF-EooC), a compilation of important FIs and TCs for a MPC-based trajectory planner, and an optimized safety concept based on the identified FIs and TCs for the MPC-based trajectory planner.
期刊介绍:
Control Engineering Practice strives to meet the needs of industrial practitioners and industrially related academics and researchers. It publishes papers which illustrate the direct application of control theory and its supporting tools in all possible areas of automation. As a result, the journal only contains papers which can be considered to have made significant contributions to the application of advanced control techniques. It is normally expected that practical results should be included, but where simulation only studies are available, it is necessary to demonstrate that the simulation model is representative of a genuine application. Strictly theoretical papers will find a more appropriate home in Control Engineering Practice''s sister publication, Automatica. It is also expected that papers are innovative with respect to the state of the art and are sufficiently detailed for a reader to be able to duplicate the main results of the paper (supplementary material, including datasets, tables, code and any relevant interactive material can be made available and downloaded from the website). The benefits of the presented methods must be made very clear and the new techniques must be compared and contrasted with results obtained using existing methods. Moreover, a thorough analysis of failures that may happen in the design process and implementation can also be part of the paper.
The scope of Control Engineering Practice matches the activities of IFAC.
Papers demonstrating the contribution of automation and control in improving the performance, quality, productivity, sustainability, resource and energy efficiency, and the manageability of systems and processes for the benefit of mankind and are relevant to industrial practitioners are most welcome.