从组织和人员因素分析工业组织过程安全管理体系的可持续性

IF 4.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ozgul Yildirim , Saliha Cetinyokus , Tahsin Cetinyokus
{"title":"从组织和人员因素分析工业组织过程安全管理体系的可持续性","authors":"Ozgul Yildirim ,&nbsp;Saliha Cetinyokus ,&nbsp;Tahsin Cetinyokus","doi":"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The organization and personnel element is critical to the sustainability of the Process Safety Management System (PSMS). This element reflects the commitment of personnel to the safety culture and procedures, the effectiveness of training and development programs, and the alignment of management systems with corporate objectives. In this study, it was aimed to analyze the sustainability of the process safety management system in industrial organizations, especially in terms of organization and personnel elements. For this purpose, a methodology based on benchmarking including the planning, data collection, analysis and adaptation stages was proposed. A case study was also performed on sample organizations (Organization A and Organization B). In the planning, the team was determined and the workflows of the sample organizations were explained. Data collection was carried out with a descriptive survey. Analyses were conducted using descriptive analysis and <em>t</em>-test. In the adaptation, targets for sustainability were determined and an action plan was developed. It was seen that Organization A and Organization B did not differ significantly in terms of personnel element (t = −1.258, p = 0.209, 95 % CI = −.192 – .042, 99 % CI = −.229 – .079). In terms of organization element, Organization B was found to be more positive than Organization A (t = −7.096, p &lt; 0.05, 95 % CI = −.775 to −.439, 99 % CI = −.829 to −.386). The action plan for Organization A focused on key issues such as a critical assessment of current procedures, establishing effective communication, strengthening safety training, establishing a safety culture, and improving emergency management. It is envisaged that the proposed methodology can be used as a practical tool in the sustainability benchmarking of organizations, specific to the relevant element.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 105750"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of process safety management system sustainability in industrial organizations with regards to organization and personnel elements\",\"authors\":\"Ozgul Yildirim ,&nbsp;Saliha Cetinyokus ,&nbsp;Tahsin Cetinyokus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The organization and personnel element is critical to the sustainability of the Process Safety Management System (PSMS). This element reflects the commitment of personnel to the safety culture and procedures, the effectiveness of training and development programs, and the alignment of management systems with corporate objectives. In this study, it was aimed to analyze the sustainability of the process safety management system in industrial organizations, especially in terms of organization and personnel elements. For this purpose, a methodology based on benchmarking including the planning, data collection, analysis and adaptation stages was proposed. A case study was also performed on sample organizations (Organization A and Organization B). In the planning, the team was determined and the workflows of the sample organizations were explained. Data collection was carried out with a descriptive survey. Analyses were conducted using descriptive analysis and <em>t</em>-test. In the adaptation, targets for sustainability were determined and an action plan was developed. It was seen that Organization A and Organization B did not differ significantly in terms of personnel element (t = −1.258, p = 0.209, 95 % CI = −.192 – .042, 99 % CI = −.229 – .079). In terms of organization element, Organization B was found to be more positive than Organization A (t = −7.096, p &lt; 0.05, 95 % CI = −.775 to −.439, 99 % CI = −.829 to −.386). The action plan for Organization A focused on key issues such as a critical assessment of current procedures, establishing effective communication, strengthening safety training, establishing a safety culture, and improving emergency management. It is envisaged that the proposed methodology can be used as a practical tool in the sustainability benchmarking of organizations, specific to the relevant element.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"volume\":\"98 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025002086\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Loss Prevention in The Process Industries","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950423025002086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

组织和人员因素对过程安全管理体系(PSMS)的可持续性至关重要。这一要素反映了员工对安全文化和程序的承诺,培训和发展计划的有效性,以及管理系统与公司目标的一致性。本研究旨在分析工业组织过程安全管理体系的可持续性,特别是从组织要素和人员要素两方面进行分析。为此目的,提出了一种基于基准的方法,包括规划、数据收集、分析和适应阶段。还对样本组织(组织A和组织B)进行了案例研究。在计划中,确定了团队,并解释了样本组织的工作流程。数据收集是通过描述性调查进行的。采用描述性分析和t检验进行分析。在适应过程中,确定了可持续性目标并制定了行动计划。结果显示,A组织和B组织在人员因素上差异不显著(t = - 1.258, p = 0.209, 95% CI = -)。192 - 0.042, 99% ci =−。229 - 0.079)。在组织要素方面,组织B比组织A更积极(t = - 7.096, p <;0.05, 95% ci =−。775 ~−。439,99% ci =−。829至−.386)。A组织的行动计划侧重于关键问题,如对现行程序进行批判性评估、建立有效的沟通、加强安全培训、建立安全文化以及改进应急管理。设想所提议的方法可作为各组织的可持续性基准的实际工具,具体到有关要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of process safety management system sustainability in industrial organizations with regards to organization and personnel elements
The organization and personnel element is critical to the sustainability of the Process Safety Management System (PSMS). This element reflects the commitment of personnel to the safety culture and procedures, the effectiveness of training and development programs, and the alignment of management systems with corporate objectives. In this study, it was aimed to analyze the sustainability of the process safety management system in industrial organizations, especially in terms of organization and personnel elements. For this purpose, a methodology based on benchmarking including the planning, data collection, analysis and adaptation stages was proposed. A case study was also performed on sample organizations (Organization A and Organization B). In the planning, the team was determined and the workflows of the sample organizations were explained. Data collection was carried out with a descriptive survey. Analyses were conducted using descriptive analysis and t-test. In the adaptation, targets for sustainability were determined and an action plan was developed. It was seen that Organization A and Organization B did not differ significantly in terms of personnel element (t = −1.258, p = 0.209, 95 % CI = −.192 – .042, 99 % CI = −.229 – .079). In terms of organization element, Organization B was found to be more positive than Organization A (t = −7.096, p < 0.05, 95 % CI = −.775 to −.439, 99 % CI = −.829 to −.386). The action plan for Organization A focused on key issues such as a critical assessment of current procedures, establishing effective communication, strengthening safety training, establishing a safety culture, and improving emergency management. It is envisaged that the proposed methodology can be used as a practical tool in the sustainability benchmarking of organizations, specific to the relevant element.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The broad scope of the journal is process safety. Process safety is defined as the prevention and mitigation of process-related injuries and damage arising from process incidents involving fire, explosion and toxic release. Such undesired events occur in the process industries during the use, storage, manufacture, handling, and transportation of highly hazardous chemicals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信