整合无效和少数民族压力理论来模拟人格病理学的日常变化。

IF 3.1 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Gabrielle S Ilagan,Gracie Schirle,Kimberly Gilbert,Elliott Lehman,Lauren A Rutter,Christopher C Conway
{"title":"整合无效和少数民族压力理论来模拟人格病理学的日常变化。","authors":"Gabrielle S Ilagan,Gracie Schirle,Kimberly Gilbert,Elliott Lehman,Lauren A Rutter,Christopher C Conway","doi":"10.1037/abn0001033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People with personality disorders (PDs) tend to experience invalidation in their daily life-others seem to disregard, reject, or punish their psychological experiences (e.g., emotions and self-concept). Our study aimed to (a) examine within-person covariation in day-to-day perceived invalidation and PD symptom severity and (b) explore minority stress as a form of invalidation-one that targets aspects of people's minoritized identities. We recruited 170 community adults and 339 undergraduate students, oversampling from sexual/gender and ethnic/racial minoritized groups, to complete daily surveys of invalidation, minority stress, and PD features over 2 weeks. We observed that daily invalidation (r = .35) and, to a smaller extent, minority stress (rs = .22-.23) had meaningful within-person correlations with same-day PD symptoms. Despite moderate between-person correlations (rrange = .28-.41) between invalidation and minority stress measures, they were more modestly associated on a within-person basis (rrange = .09-.11). In a multilevel multiple regression model, both invalidation and minority stress uniquely predicted daily PD symptoms, collectively accounting for approximately 20% of within-person outcome variation. Based on these results, we speculate that various forms of invalidation (i.e., those that target thoughts, emotions, self-concepts, and identities) interact with PD features in a vicious cycle, such that daily invalidation activates personality pathology, which evokes more invalidation, and so on. We encourage more recognition of identity-based invalidation and investigation into the ways that minority stress could advance interpersonal theories of personality pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":73914,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating invalidation and minority stress theories to model daily change in personality pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle S Ilagan,Gracie Schirle,Kimberly Gilbert,Elliott Lehman,Lauren A Rutter,Christopher C Conway\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0001033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"People with personality disorders (PDs) tend to experience invalidation in their daily life-others seem to disregard, reject, or punish their psychological experiences (e.g., emotions and self-concept). Our study aimed to (a) examine within-person covariation in day-to-day perceived invalidation and PD symptom severity and (b) explore minority stress as a form of invalidation-one that targets aspects of people's minoritized identities. We recruited 170 community adults and 339 undergraduate students, oversampling from sexual/gender and ethnic/racial minoritized groups, to complete daily surveys of invalidation, minority stress, and PD features over 2 weeks. We observed that daily invalidation (r = .35) and, to a smaller extent, minority stress (rs = .22-.23) had meaningful within-person correlations with same-day PD symptoms. Despite moderate between-person correlations (rrange = .28-.41) between invalidation and minority stress measures, they were more modestly associated on a within-person basis (rrange = .09-.11). In a multilevel multiple regression model, both invalidation and minority stress uniquely predicted daily PD symptoms, collectively accounting for approximately 20% of within-person outcome variation. Based on these results, we speculate that various forms of invalidation (i.e., those that target thoughts, emotions, self-concepts, and identities) interact with PD features in a vicious cycle, such that daily invalidation activates personality pathology, which evokes more invalidation, and so on. We encourage more recognition of identity-based invalidation and investigation into the ways that minority stress could advance interpersonal theories of personality pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).\",\"PeriodicalId\":73914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001033\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychopathology and clinical science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0001033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患有人格障碍(pd)的人在日常生活中倾向于经历无效——其他人似乎忽视、拒绝或惩罚他们的心理体验(例如情绪和自我概念)。我们的研究旨在(a)检查日常感知的无效和PD症状严重程度的个人内部共变,(b)探索少数派压力作为无效的一种形式-一种针对人们的少数身份的方面。我们招募了170名社区成年人和339名本科生,从性/性别和少数民族/种族群体中进行过抽样,在两周内完成了关于无效、少数民族压力和PD特征的日常调查。我们观察到,每日失效(r = 0.35)和较小程度上的少数民族压力(rs = 0.22 - 0.23)与当日PD症状具有显著的人内相关性。尽管无效和少数民族压力测量之间存在适度的人际相关性(范围= 0.28 - 0.41),但它们在个人基础上的相关性更为适度(范围= 0.09 - 0.11)。在一个多水平多元回归模型中,无效和少数民族压力都能唯一地预测PD的日常症状,总共约占个体结果变化的20%。基于这些结果,我们推测各种形式的失能(即那些以思想、情感、自我概念和身份为目标的失能)与PD特征在恶性循环中相互作用,例如每天的失能会激活人格病理,从而引发更多的失能,等等。我们鼓励更多地认识到基于身份的无效,并研究少数族裔压力如何促进人格病理学的人际理论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating invalidation and minority stress theories to model daily change in personality pathology.
People with personality disorders (PDs) tend to experience invalidation in their daily life-others seem to disregard, reject, or punish their psychological experiences (e.g., emotions and self-concept). Our study aimed to (a) examine within-person covariation in day-to-day perceived invalidation and PD symptom severity and (b) explore minority stress as a form of invalidation-one that targets aspects of people's minoritized identities. We recruited 170 community adults and 339 undergraduate students, oversampling from sexual/gender and ethnic/racial minoritized groups, to complete daily surveys of invalidation, minority stress, and PD features over 2 weeks. We observed that daily invalidation (r = .35) and, to a smaller extent, minority stress (rs = .22-.23) had meaningful within-person correlations with same-day PD symptoms. Despite moderate between-person correlations (rrange = .28-.41) between invalidation and minority stress measures, they were more modestly associated on a within-person basis (rrange = .09-.11). In a multilevel multiple regression model, both invalidation and minority stress uniquely predicted daily PD symptoms, collectively accounting for approximately 20% of within-person outcome variation. Based on these results, we speculate that various forms of invalidation (i.e., those that target thoughts, emotions, self-concepts, and identities) interact with PD features in a vicious cycle, such that daily invalidation activates personality pathology, which evokes more invalidation, and so on. We encourage more recognition of identity-based invalidation and investigation into the ways that minority stress could advance interpersonal theories of personality pathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信