弹性与损失缓解:来自中国的实证研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Risk Analysis Pub Date : 2025-08-02 DOI:10.1111/risa.70082
Ling Tan, Xianhua Wu, Ji Guo
{"title":"弹性与损失缓解:来自中国的实证研究。","authors":"Ling Tan, Xianhua Wu, Ji Guo","doi":"10.1111/risa.70082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The importance of resilience in mitigating the impacts of disasters has gained increasing recognition, yet quantitative analyses assessing its effectiveness in reducing losses remain limited. This paper introduces a novel approach to integrate resilience into a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to quantitatively assess its role in loss mitigation. First, a conventional CGE model is employed to evaluate economic losses caused by disasters without considering resilience, establishing a baseline analysis of disaster impacts. Next, the economic impacts of disasters are reassessed after incorporating resilience into the production module by adjusting elasticity parameters. By comparing the baseline scenario with the resilience-enhanced model, the extent and effectiveness of resilience in reducing disaster losses could be evaluated. To validate the approach, the extreme rainfall event in Beijing on July 21, 2012, is used as a case study. The results show that incorporating resilience leads to a significant reduction in economic losses. Specifically, the losses of total output are reduced from $29.10 billion to $20.98 billion, corresponding to a reduction in the loss rate from 3.88% to 2.80%. Furthermore, recovery rates vary across industrial sectors, with wholesale and retail trade, and services recovering most quickly, while sectors such as the production and supply of electricity, gas, water, and manufacturing exhibit slower recovery rates. This research provides valuable insights into disaster resilience assessment. The findings have practical implications for policymakers and agencies involved to carry out the development of resilience strategies and post-disaster management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21472,"journal":{"name":"Risk Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resilience and loss mitigation: An empirical study from China.\",\"authors\":\"Ling Tan, Xianhua Wu, Ji Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/risa.70082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The importance of resilience in mitigating the impacts of disasters has gained increasing recognition, yet quantitative analyses assessing its effectiveness in reducing losses remain limited. This paper introduces a novel approach to integrate resilience into a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to quantitatively assess its role in loss mitigation. First, a conventional CGE model is employed to evaluate economic losses caused by disasters without considering resilience, establishing a baseline analysis of disaster impacts. Next, the economic impacts of disasters are reassessed after incorporating resilience into the production module by adjusting elasticity parameters. By comparing the baseline scenario with the resilience-enhanced model, the extent and effectiveness of resilience in reducing disaster losses could be evaluated. To validate the approach, the extreme rainfall event in Beijing on July 21, 2012, is used as a case study. The results show that incorporating resilience leads to a significant reduction in economic losses. Specifically, the losses of total output are reduced from $29.10 billion to $20.98 billion, corresponding to a reduction in the loss rate from 3.88% to 2.80%. Furthermore, recovery rates vary across industrial sectors, with wholesale and retail trade, and services recovering most quickly, while sectors such as the production and supply of electricity, gas, water, and manufacturing exhibit slower recovery rates. This research provides valuable insights into disaster resilience assessment. The findings have practical implications for policymakers and agencies involved to carry out the development of resilience strategies and post-disaster management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Risk Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70082\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复原力在减轻灾害影响方面的重要性已得到越来越多的认识,但评估复原力在减少损失方面有效性的定量分析仍然有限。本文介绍了一种将弹性纳入可计算一般均衡(CGE)模型的新方法,以定量评估其在减少损失中的作用。首先,在不考虑复原力的情况下,采用传统的CGE模型评估灾害造成的经济损失,建立灾害影响的基线分析。其次,通过调整弹性参数,将弹性纳入生产模块后,重新评估灾害的经济影响。通过将基线情景与复原力增强模型进行比较,可以评估复原力在减少灾害损失方面的程度和有效性。以2012年7月21日北京极端降水事件为例,验证了该方法的有效性。结果表明,纳入弹性可以显著减少经济损失。具体而言,总产出损失由291亿美元减少到209.8亿美元,损失率由3.88%减少到2.80%。此外,各个工业部门的复苏速度各不相同,批发和零售贸易以及服务业复苏最快,而电力、天然气、水和制造业等生产和供应部门的复苏速度较慢。本研究为灾害恢复力评估提供了有价值的见解。这些发现对决策者和相关机构实施恢复力战略和灾后管理具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resilience and loss mitigation: An empirical study from China.

The importance of resilience in mitigating the impacts of disasters has gained increasing recognition, yet quantitative analyses assessing its effectiveness in reducing losses remain limited. This paper introduces a novel approach to integrate resilience into a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to quantitatively assess its role in loss mitigation. First, a conventional CGE model is employed to evaluate economic losses caused by disasters without considering resilience, establishing a baseline analysis of disaster impacts. Next, the economic impacts of disasters are reassessed after incorporating resilience into the production module by adjusting elasticity parameters. By comparing the baseline scenario with the resilience-enhanced model, the extent and effectiveness of resilience in reducing disaster losses could be evaluated. To validate the approach, the extreme rainfall event in Beijing on July 21, 2012, is used as a case study. The results show that incorporating resilience leads to a significant reduction in economic losses. Specifically, the losses of total output are reduced from $29.10 billion to $20.98 billion, corresponding to a reduction in the loss rate from 3.88% to 2.80%. Furthermore, recovery rates vary across industrial sectors, with wholesale and retail trade, and services recovering most quickly, while sectors such as the production and supply of electricity, gas, water, and manufacturing exhibit slower recovery rates. This research provides valuable insights into disaster resilience assessment. The findings have practical implications for policymakers and agencies involved to carry out the development of resilience strategies and post-disaster management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Society for Risk Analysis, Risk Analysis is ranked among the top 10 journals in the ISI Journal Citation Reports under the social sciences, mathematical methods category, and provides a focal point for new developments in the field of risk analysis. This international peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing critical empirical research and commentaries dealing with risk issues. The topics covered include: • Human health and safety risks • Microbial risks • Engineering • Mathematical modeling • Risk characterization • Risk communication • Risk management and decision-making • Risk perception, acceptability, and ethics • Laws and regulatory policy • Ecological risks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信