改善院内新生儿复苏结果的十个步骤。

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Elizabeth E Foglia, Siren Rettedal, Vinay Nadkarni, Jackie K Patterson, Peter G Davis, Susan Niermeyer, Asmita Acharya, Santorino Data, Maria Fernanda de Almeida, Abiy Seifu Estifanos, Jorge Fabres, Qi Feng, Ruth Guinsburg, Kenechukwu Iloh, Juin Yee Kong, Estomih Mduma, Mackenzie O'Reilly, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Suman Rao Pn, Mario Rüdiger, Sprina Joseph Ryoba, Jose Maria Solano, Krothapalli Susila, Marta Thio-Lluch, Daniele Trevisanuto, Sithembiso C Velaphi, Gary M Weiner, Hege L Ersdal
{"title":"改善院内新生儿复苏结果的十个步骤。","authors":"Elizabeth E Foglia, Siren Rettedal, Vinay Nadkarni, Jackie K Patterson, Peter G Davis, Susan Niermeyer, Asmita Acharya, Santorino Data, Maria Fernanda de Almeida, Abiy Seifu Estifanos, Jorge Fabres, Qi Feng, Ruth Guinsburg, Kenechukwu Iloh, Juin Yee Kong, Estomih Mduma, Mackenzie O'Reilly, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Suman Rao Pn, Mario Rüdiger, Sprina Joseph Ryoba, Jose Maria Solano, Krothapalli Susila, Marta Thio-Lluch, Daniele Trevisanuto, Sithembiso C Velaphi, Gary M Weiner, Hege L Ersdal","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to 10 % of all newborns require assistance to breathe at birth. Although neonatal resuscitation guidelines and educational platforms exist, best practices to implement high-quality neonatal resuscitation care have not been defined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish a Neonatal Global Resuscitation Alliance and develop ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation across global settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-stage iterative consensus-based process: (1) invited input from the neonatal resuscitation community to identify pertinent measures, (2) convened a face-to-face meeting of 28 global neonatal resuscitation content experts to refine consensus steps, (3) presented draft steps and related content to stakeholders; solicited public comment and revised ten steps based on feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The consensus-based ten steps include: Implement effective education systems; Ensure team and equipment readiness; Identify high-risk pregnancies and prevent perinatal risks; Respond to every birth; Perform guideline based resuscitation; Deliver guideline based post-resuscitation care; Collect data throughout resuscitation care; Improve quality of resuscitation; Support parent and family well-being; Cultivate a culture of excellence. For each of these steps, key concepts and suggested approaches to put the steps into practice are identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation represent a clear framework for healthcare professionals, institutions, and policymakers to evaluate and strengthen their readiness, training, and response to newborns who need resuscitation at birth. This consensus-based guidance can be used to optimize in-facility neonatal resuscitation and improve outcomes for newborns worldwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":" ","pages":"110746"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth E Foglia, Siren Rettedal, Vinay Nadkarni, Jackie K Patterson, Peter G Davis, Susan Niermeyer, Asmita Acharya, Santorino Data, Maria Fernanda de Almeida, Abiy Seifu Estifanos, Jorge Fabres, Qi Feng, Ruth Guinsburg, Kenechukwu Iloh, Juin Yee Kong, Estomih Mduma, Mackenzie O'Reilly, Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry Ramaswamy, Suman Rao Pn, Mario Rüdiger, Sprina Joseph Ryoba, Jose Maria Solano, Krothapalli Susila, Marta Thio-Lluch, Daniele Trevisanuto, Sithembiso C Velaphi, Gary M Weiner, Hege L Ersdal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Up to 10 % of all newborns require assistance to breathe at birth. Although neonatal resuscitation guidelines and educational platforms exist, best practices to implement high-quality neonatal resuscitation care have not been defined.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To establish a Neonatal Global Resuscitation Alliance and develop ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation across global settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three-stage iterative consensus-based process: (1) invited input from the neonatal resuscitation community to identify pertinent measures, (2) convened a face-to-face meeting of 28 global neonatal resuscitation content experts to refine consensus steps, (3) presented draft steps and related content to stakeholders; solicited public comment and revised ten steps based on feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The consensus-based ten steps include: Implement effective education systems; Ensure team and equipment readiness; Identify high-risk pregnancies and prevent perinatal risks; Respond to every birth; Perform guideline based resuscitation; Deliver guideline based post-resuscitation care; Collect data throughout resuscitation care; Improve quality of resuscitation; Support parent and family well-being; Cultivate a culture of excellence. For each of these steps, key concepts and suggested approaches to put the steps into practice are identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation represent a clear framework for healthcare professionals, institutions, and policymakers to evaluate and strengthen their readiness, training, and response to newborns who need resuscitation at birth. This consensus-based guidance can be used to optimize in-facility neonatal resuscitation and improve outcomes for newborns worldwide.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resuscitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"110746\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110746\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110746","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高达10%的新生儿在出生时需要辅助呼吸。尽管存在新生儿复苏指南和教育平台,但实施高质量新生儿复苏护理的最佳实践尚未确定。目的:建立新生儿全球复苏联盟,并制定十项措施,以改善全球范围内新生儿复苏的结果。方法:基于共识的三阶段迭代过程:(1)邀请新生儿复苏社区提供意见,以确定相关措施;(2)召集全球28名新生儿复苏内容专家面对面会议,以完善共识步骤;(3)向利益相关者提交步骤草案和相关内容;征求公众意见,并根据反馈修改了10个步骤。结果:基于共识的十个步骤包括:实施有效的教育制度;确保团队和设备准备就绪;确定高危妊娠并预防围产期风险;回应每一个出生;实施基于指南的复苏;提供基于指南的复苏后护理;在复苏护理过程中收集数据;提高复苏质量;支持父母和家庭的福祉;培养卓越的文化。对于每个步骤,确定了关键概念和将这些步骤付诸实践的建议方法。结论:改善院内新生儿复苏结果的这十个步骤为医疗保健专业人员、机构和政策制定者提供了一个明确的框架,以评估和加强他们对出生时需要复苏的新生儿的准备、培训和反应。这种基于共识的指导可用于优化设施内新生儿复苏并改善全世界新生儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation.

Background: Up to 10 % of all newborns require assistance to breathe at birth. Although neonatal resuscitation guidelines and educational platforms exist, best practices to implement high-quality neonatal resuscitation care have not been defined.

Aim: To establish a Neonatal Global Resuscitation Alliance and develop ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation across global settings.

Methods: Three-stage iterative consensus-based process: (1) invited input from the neonatal resuscitation community to identify pertinent measures, (2) convened a face-to-face meeting of 28 global neonatal resuscitation content experts to refine consensus steps, (3) presented draft steps and related content to stakeholders; solicited public comment and revised ten steps based on feedback.

Results: The consensus-based ten steps include: Implement effective education systems; Ensure team and equipment readiness; Identify high-risk pregnancies and prevent perinatal risks; Respond to every birth; Perform guideline based resuscitation; Deliver guideline based post-resuscitation care; Collect data throughout resuscitation care; Improve quality of resuscitation; Support parent and family well-being; Cultivate a culture of excellence. For each of these steps, key concepts and suggested approaches to put the steps into practice are identified.

Conclusion: These ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation represent a clear framework for healthcare professionals, institutions, and policymakers to evaluate and strengthen their readiness, training, and response to newborns who need resuscitation at birth. This consensus-based guidance can be used to optimize in-facility neonatal resuscitation and improve outcomes for newborns worldwide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信