年龄不影响冷冻胚胎移植周期中获得的最大子宫内膜厚度:sartors研究。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Anat Chemerinski, Kristin Blackledge, Patricia Greenberg, Nataki C Douglas, Peter G McGovern, Sara S Morelli
{"title":"年龄不影响冷冻胚胎移植周期中获得的最大子宫内膜厚度:sartors研究。","authors":"Anat Chemerinski, Kristin Blackledge, Patricia Greenberg, Nataki C Douglas, Peter G McGovern, Sara S Morelli","doi":"10.1186/s12958-025-01451-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age is known to affect the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. While significant research efforts have been directed at investigating the effects of aging on oocytes, few studies have examined the effect of aging on the endometrium. We sought to assess whether age negatively impacts peak endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS) database between 2016 and 2020. Young (< 35) and older (≥35yo) non-identified oocyte donor (NOD) recipients were included to assess the impact of age on endometrial thickness; young and older gestational carriers (GCs) served as the respective controls for these two groups. The primary outcome was peak endometrial thickness achieved in an FET cycle; additional outcomes included cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a weak association between age and endometrial thickness in both NOD recipient and GC cycles. Though pregnancy rates were slightly lower at endometrial thicknesses < 8 mm, we observed no difference in clinical pregnancy rate with endometrial thicknesses between 8 and 18 mm. We found a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate in GCs compared to NOD recipients in both the young and older age groups, and noted a decreasing clinical pregnancy rate with age in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest an age-related decline in pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients and gestational carrier cycles, in which an endometrial factor would not necessarily be anticipated; this endometrial factor does not appear to be related to endometrial thickness. Therefore, our data support the existence of an endometrial factor that cannot be assessed by measurements of thickness, but nevertheless plays a crucial role in the success of an embryo implantation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":21011,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","volume":"23 1","pages":"115"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317531/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age does not affect maximal endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a SARTCORS study.\",\"authors\":\"Anat Chemerinski, Kristin Blackledge, Patricia Greenberg, Nataki C Douglas, Peter G McGovern, Sara S Morelli\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12958-025-01451-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Age is known to affect the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. While significant research efforts have been directed at investigating the effects of aging on oocytes, few studies have examined the effect of aging on the endometrium. We sought to assess whether age negatively impacts peak endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS) database between 2016 and 2020. Young (< 35) and older (≥35yo) non-identified oocyte donor (NOD) recipients were included to assess the impact of age on endometrial thickness; young and older gestational carriers (GCs) served as the respective controls for these two groups. The primary outcome was peak endometrial thickness achieved in an FET cycle; additional outcomes included cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed a weak association between age and endometrial thickness in both NOD recipient and GC cycles. Though pregnancy rates were slightly lower at endometrial thicknesses < 8 mm, we observed no difference in clinical pregnancy rate with endometrial thicknesses between 8 and 18 mm. We found a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate in GCs compared to NOD recipients in both the young and older age groups, and noted a decreasing clinical pregnancy rate with age in all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data suggest an age-related decline in pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients and gestational carrier cycles, in which an endometrial factor would not necessarily be anticipated; this endometrial factor does not appear to be related to endometrial thickness. Therefore, our data support the existence of an endometrial factor that cannot be assessed by measurements of thickness, but nevertheless plays a crucial role in the success of an embryo implantation.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21011,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317531/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-025-01451-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-025-01451-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:年龄是已知的影响辅助生殖技术(ART)治疗的成功。虽然大量的研究工作都是为了调查衰老对卵母细胞的影响,但很少有研究调查衰老对子宫内膜的影响。我们试图评估年龄是否会对冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期中达到的子宫内膜峰值厚度产生负面影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,利用2016年至2020年辅助生殖技术协会临床结果报告系统(SART CORS)数据库。结果:在NOD受体和GC周期中,我们观察到年龄和子宫内膜厚度之间存在弱关联。结论:我们的数据表明,在供体卵母细胞受体和妊娠载体周期中,妊娠率与年龄相关,其中子宫内膜因素不一定是预期的;这个子宫内膜因子似乎与子宫内膜厚度无关。因此,我们的数据支持子宫内膜因子的存在,它不能通过测量厚度来评估,但在胚胎植入的成功中起着至关重要的作用。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Age does not affect maximal endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a SARTCORS study.

Age does not affect maximal endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a SARTCORS study.

Age does not affect maximal endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a SARTCORS study.

Age does not affect maximal endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer cycles: a SARTCORS study.

Background: Age is known to affect the success of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment. While significant research efforts have been directed at investigating the effects of aging on oocytes, few studies have examined the effect of aging on the endometrium. We sought to assess whether age negatively impacts peak endometrial thickness achieved in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System (SART CORS) database between 2016 and 2020. Young (< 35) and older (≥35yo) non-identified oocyte donor (NOD) recipients were included to assess the impact of age on endometrial thickness; young and older gestational carriers (GCs) served as the respective controls for these two groups. The primary outcome was peak endometrial thickness achieved in an FET cycle; additional outcomes included cycle cancellation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate.

Results: We observed a weak association between age and endometrial thickness in both NOD recipient and GC cycles. Though pregnancy rates were slightly lower at endometrial thicknesses < 8 mm, we observed no difference in clinical pregnancy rate with endometrial thicknesses between 8 and 18 mm. We found a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate in GCs compared to NOD recipients in both the young and older age groups, and noted a decreasing clinical pregnancy rate with age in all groups.

Conclusion: Our data suggest an age-related decline in pregnancy rates in donor oocyte recipients and gestational carrier cycles, in which an endometrial factor would not necessarily be anticipated; this endometrial factor does not appear to be related to endometrial thickness. Therefore, our data support the existence of an endometrial factor that cannot be assessed by measurements of thickness, but nevertheless plays a crucial role in the success of an embryo implantation.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.30%
发文量
161
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology publishes and disseminates high-quality results from excellent research in the reproductive sciences. The journal publishes on topics covering gametogenesis, fertilization, early embryonic development, embryo-uterus interaction, reproductive development, pregnancy, uterine biology, endocrinology of reproduction, control of reproduction, reproductive immunology, neuroendocrinology, and veterinary and human reproductive medicine, including all vertebrate species.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信