透视引导下经静脉股肾移植活检:一项109例连续患者的单中心回顾性研究。

IF 4.8 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Farha Tessier, Charles Roux, Isabelle Brocheriou, Benoit Barrou, Marine Bravetti, Mathilde Aïssaoui, Jean-Charles Bijot, Eloi Varin, Jérome Tourret, Hélène François, Sarah Drouin, Louis Meyblum
{"title":"透视引导下经静脉股肾移植活检:一项109例连续患者的单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Farha Tessier, Charles Roux, Isabelle Brocheriou, Benoit Barrou, Marine Bravetti, Mathilde Aïssaoui, Jean-Charles Bijot, Eloi Varin, Jérome Tourret, Hélène François, Sarah Drouin, Louis Meyblum","doi":"10.1007/s11547-025-02045-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Renal transplant biopsy remains the gold standard for etiological diagnosis of graft dysfunction and subsequent management. When percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is contraindicated due to bleeding risk or limited percutaneous access, the fluoroscopy-guided transvenous femoral renal transplant biopsy (TFRB) might be a valuable alternative. This study aims to describe the TFRB technique, its safety, and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent TFRB at our institution between 2020 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Procedure outcomes, patients' characteristics and follow-up data were collected. Adverse events were graded using the Adverse Events Classification of the Society of Interventional Radiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2020 to December 2023, 109 patients (median age 61.2 years (Interquartile range (IQR), 54.5-68.6) ; 49 males (45.0%)) underwent 122 TFRB. Transvenous approach was indicated due to high bleeding risk in 61.5% (75/122), limited percutaneous access in 13.9% (17/122), or previous failed PRB in 2.5% (3/122). Biopsy success rate was 94.3%, with 7 graft vein catheterization failures. Adequate Banff 97 criteria specimens were obtained in 68.7% of cases, and a definitive histological diagnosis was achieved in 96.5% of biopsies. Complications occurred in 20.0% of procedures (23/115), including 9 major complications (7.8%), with no significant difference according to the TFRB indication (bleeding risk versus percutaneous limited access) (p = 0.70), use of antiplatelet agents (p = 0.24) or anticoagulants (p = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first large cohort study to demonstrates TFRB to be effective and safe in case of contraindication to PRB, providing valuable insights for graft dysfunction management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20817,"journal":{"name":"Radiologia Medica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluoroscopy-guided transvenous femoral renal transplant biopsies: a monocentric retrospective study about 109 consecutive patients.\",\"authors\":\"Farha Tessier, Charles Roux, Isabelle Brocheriou, Benoit Barrou, Marine Bravetti, Mathilde Aïssaoui, Jean-Charles Bijot, Eloi Varin, Jérome Tourret, Hélène François, Sarah Drouin, Louis Meyblum\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-025-02045-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Renal transplant biopsy remains the gold standard for etiological diagnosis of graft dysfunction and subsequent management. When percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is contraindicated due to bleeding risk or limited percutaneous access, the fluoroscopy-guided transvenous femoral renal transplant biopsy (TFRB) might be a valuable alternative. This study aims to describe the TFRB technique, its safety, and efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent TFRB at our institution between 2020 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Procedure outcomes, patients' characteristics and follow-up data were collected. Adverse events were graded using the Adverse Events Classification of the Society of Interventional Radiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 2020 to December 2023, 109 patients (median age 61.2 years (Interquartile range (IQR), 54.5-68.6) ; 49 males (45.0%)) underwent 122 TFRB. Transvenous approach was indicated due to high bleeding risk in 61.5% (75/122), limited percutaneous access in 13.9% (17/122), or previous failed PRB in 2.5% (3/122). Biopsy success rate was 94.3%, with 7 graft vein catheterization failures. Adequate Banff 97 criteria specimens were obtained in 68.7% of cases, and a definitive histological diagnosis was achieved in 96.5% of biopsies. Complications occurred in 20.0% of procedures (23/115), including 9 major complications (7.8%), with no significant difference according to the TFRB indication (bleeding risk versus percutaneous limited access) (p = 0.70), use of antiplatelet agents (p = 0.24) or anticoagulants (p = 1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first large cohort study to demonstrates TFRB to be effective and safe in case of contraindication to PRB, providing valuable insights for graft dysfunction management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiologia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02045-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-025-02045-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肾移植活检仍然是肾移植功能障碍病因诊断和后续处理的金标准。当经皮肾活检(PRB)因出血风险或经皮穿刺受限而禁忌时,透视引导下经静脉股肾移植活检(TFRB)可能是一种有价值的选择。本研究旨在描述TFRB技术,其安全性和有效性。方法:回顾性分析2020年至2023年在我院接受TFRB治疗的所有患者。收集手术结果、患者特征和随访数据。不良事件按照介入放射学会不良事件分级进行分级。结果:2020年1月至2023年12月,109例患者(中位年龄61.2岁(四分位数间距(IQR), 54.5-68.6);49名男性(45.0%)接受了122次TFRB。61.5%(75/122)患者因出血风险高,13.9%(17/122)患者经皮入路受限,2.5%(3/122)患者既往PRB失败而选择经静脉入路。活检成功率94.3%,移植物静脉置管失败7例。68.7%的病例获得了足够的Banff 97标准标本,96.5%的活检获得了明确的组织学诊断。20.0%的手术发生了并发症(23/115),包括9个主要并发症(7.8%),根据TFRB适应症(出血风险与经皮受限通路)(p = 0.70),使用抗血小板药物(p = 0.24)或抗凝血药物(p = 1.00),无显著差异。结论:这是第一个大型队列研究,证明TFRB在PRB禁忌症下是有效和安全的,为移植物功能障碍的管理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluoroscopy-guided transvenous femoral renal transplant biopsies: a monocentric retrospective study about 109 consecutive patients.

Objectives: Renal transplant biopsy remains the gold standard for etiological diagnosis of graft dysfunction and subsequent management. When percutaneous renal biopsy (PRB) is contraindicated due to bleeding risk or limited percutaneous access, the fluoroscopy-guided transvenous femoral renal transplant biopsy (TFRB) might be a valuable alternative. This study aims to describe the TFRB technique, its safety, and efficacy.

Methods: All patients who underwent TFRB at our institution between 2020 and 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Procedure outcomes, patients' characteristics and follow-up data were collected. Adverse events were graded using the Adverse Events Classification of the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Results: From January 2020 to December 2023, 109 patients (median age 61.2 years (Interquartile range (IQR), 54.5-68.6) ; 49 males (45.0%)) underwent 122 TFRB. Transvenous approach was indicated due to high bleeding risk in 61.5% (75/122), limited percutaneous access in 13.9% (17/122), or previous failed PRB in 2.5% (3/122). Biopsy success rate was 94.3%, with 7 graft vein catheterization failures. Adequate Banff 97 criteria specimens were obtained in 68.7% of cases, and a definitive histological diagnosis was achieved in 96.5% of biopsies. Complications occurred in 20.0% of procedures (23/115), including 9 major complications (7.8%), with no significant difference according to the TFRB indication (bleeding risk versus percutaneous limited access) (p = 0.70), use of antiplatelet agents (p = 0.24) or anticoagulants (p = 1.00).

Conclusion: This is the first large cohort study to demonstrates TFRB to be effective and safe in case of contraindication to PRB, providing valuable insights for graft dysfunction management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiologia Medica
Radiologia Medica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
7.90%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Felice Perussia founded La radiologia medica in 1914. It is a peer-reviewed journal and serves as the official journal of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM). The primary purpose of the journal is to disseminate information related to Radiology, especially advancements in diagnostic imaging and related disciplines. La radiologia medica welcomes original research on both fundamental and clinical aspects of modern radiology, with a particular focus on diagnostic and interventional imaging techniques. It also covers topics such as radiotherapy, nuclear medicine, radiobiology, health physics, and artificial intelligence in the context of clinical implications. The journal includes various types of contributions such as original articles, review articles, editorials, short reports, and letters to the editor. With an esteemed Editorial Board and a selection of insightful reports, the journal is an indispensable resource for radiologists and professionals in related fields. Ultimately, La radiologia medica aims to serve as a platform for international collaboration and knowledge sharing within the radiological community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信