Joanne M. Kingsbury , Anne Midwinter , John Mills , Mark Englefield , Roy Biggs , Anne-Marie Perchec Merien , Nicola Dermer , Aswathi Soni , Milana Blakemore
{"title":"鸡胴体冲洗液中弯曲杆菌的相对离心力法计数和检测方法的验证。","authors":"Joanne M. Kingsbury , Anne Midwinter , John Mills , Mark Englefield , Roy Biggs , Anne-Marie Perchec Merien , Nicola Dermer , Aswathi Soni , Milana Blakemore","doi":"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently notified foodborne disease in New Zealand and poultry is the predominant infection source. New Zealand monitors <em>Campylobacter</em> present in poultry carcass rinsates under the National Microbiological Database (NMD) programme. To better monitor <em>Campylobacter</em> control improvements, a more sensitive method is required that can enumerate rinsates with lower <em>Campylobacter</em> numbers. This study developed a modification of the current NMD method involving adding a relative centrifugal force (RCF) step for concentrating <em>Campylobacter</em> from poultry carcass rinsates. Centrifugation for 30 min significantly improved <em>Campylobacter</em> recovery compared with 15 min (<em>p</em> < 0.001), but there were no differences between RCFs of 3500, 4000 and 4430 x g (<em>p</em> = 0.992). RCF and NMD method performances were compared in a single laboratory validation study that used different inoculation levels of twelve <em>Campylobacter</em> strains, including poultry isolates. <em>Campylobacter</em> was detected from more samples (<em>p</em> < 0.001) using the RCF method (93 of 126; 73.8 %) than the NMD method (65 of 126; 51.6 %). The RCF method had a seven-fold lower detection limit (28 colony forming units (CFU)/400 ml) than the NMD method (200 CFU/400 ml). The detection limit accounted for an observed 70.3 % of the inoculated CFU captured within the centrifuged pellet. <em>Campylobacter</em> was also detected from significantly more (<em>p</em> < 0.001) commercial chicken rinsate samples tested by poultry industry laboratories using the RCF method (257 of 863; 29.8 %) than the NMD method (114 of 863; 13.2 %). Taken together, results support the RCF method as a modification of the NMD method to enumerate lower numbers of <em>Campylobacter</em> in rinsates.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16409,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microbiological methods","volume":"236 ","pages":"Article 107207"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Relative Centrifugal Force method for the enumeration and detection of Campylobacter from chicken carcass rinsates\",\"authors\":\"Joanne M. Kingsbury , Anne Midwinter , John Mills , Mark Englefield , Roy Biggs , Anne-Marie Perchec Merien , Nicola Dermer , Aswathi Soni , Milana Blakemore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mimet.2025.107207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently notified foodborne disease in New Zealand and poultry is the predominant infection source. New Zealand monitors <em>Campylobacter</em> present in poultry carcass rinsates under the National Microbiological Database (NMD) programme. To better monitor <em>Campylobacter</em> control improvements, a more sensitive method is required that can enumerate rinsates with lower <em>Campylobacter</em> numbers. This study developed a modification of the current NMD method involving adding a relative centrifugal force (RCF) step for concentrating <em>Campylobacter</em> from poultry carcass rinsates. Centrifugation for 30 min significantly improved <em>Campylobacter</em> recovery compared with 15 min (<em>p</em> < 0.001), but there were no differences between RCFs of 3500, 4000 and 4430 x g (<em>p</em> = 0.992). RCF and NMD method performances were compared in a single laboratory validation study that used different inoculation levels of twelve <em>Campylobacter</em> strains, including poultry isolates. <em>Campylobacter</em> was detected from more samples (<em>p</em> < 0.001) using the RCF method (93 of 126; 73.8 %) than the NMD method (65 of 126; 51.6 %). The RCF method had a seven-fold lower detection limit (28 colony forming units (CFU)/400 ml) than the NMD method (200 CFU/400 ml). The detection limit accounted for an observed 70.3 % of the inoculated CFU captured within the centrifuged pellet. <em>Campylobacter</em> was also detected from significantly more (<em>p</em> < 0.001) commercial chicken rinsate samples tested by poultry industry laboratories using the RCF method (257 of 863; 29.8 %) than the NMD method (114 of 863; 13.2 %). Taken together, results support the RCF method as a modification of the NMD method to enumerate lower numbers of <em>Campylobacter</em> in rinsates.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"volume\":\"236 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107207\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microbiological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770122500123X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microbiological methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016770122500123X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of a Relative Centrifugal Force method for the enumeration and detection of Campylobacter from chicken carcass rinsates
Campylobacteriosis is the most frequently notified foodborne disease in New Zealand and poultry is the predominant infection source. New Zealand monitors Campylobacter present in poultry carcass rinsates under the National Microbiological Database (NMD) programme. To better monitor Campylobacter control improvements, a more sensitive method is required that can enumerate rinsates with lower Campylobacter numbers. This study developed a modification of the current NMD method involving adding a relative centrifugal force (RCF) step for concentrating Campylobacter from poultry carcass rinsates. Centrifugation for 30 min significantly improved Campylobacter recovery compared with 15 min (p < 0.001), but there were no differences between RCFs of 3500, 4000 and 4430 x g (p = 0.992). RCF and NMD method performances were compared in a single laboratory validation study that used different inoculation levels of twelve Campylobacter strains, including poultry isolates. Campylobacter was detected from more samples (p < 0.001) using the RCF method (93 of 126; 73.8 %) than the NMD method (65 of 126; 51.6 %). The RCF method had a seven-fold lower detection limit (28 colony forming units (CFU)/400 ml) than the NMD method (200 CFU/400 ml). The detection limit accounted for an observed 70.3 % of the inoculated CFU captured within the centrifuged pellet. Campylobacter was also detected from significantly more (p < 0.001) commercial chicken rinsate samples tested by poultry industry laboratories using the RCF method (257 of 863; 29.8 %) than the NMD method (114 of 863; 13.2 %). Taken together, results support the RCF method as a modification of the NMD method to enumerate lower numbers of Campylobacter in rinsates.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Microbiological Methods publishes scholarly and original articles, notes and review articles. These articles must include novel and/or state-of-the-art methods, or significant improvements to existing methods. Novel and innovative applications of current methods that are validated and useful will also be published. JMM strives for scholarship, innovation and excellence. This demands scientific rigour, the best available methods and technologies, correctly replicated experiments/tests, the inclusion of proper controls, calibrations, and the correct statistical analysis. The presentation of the data must support the interpretation of the method/approach.
All aspects of microbiology are covered, except virology. These include agricultural microbiology, applied and environmental microbiology, bioassays, bioinformatics, biotechnology, biochemical microbiology, clinical microbiology, diagnostics, food monitoring and quality control microbiology, microbial genetics and genomics, geomicrobiology, microbiome methods regardless of habitat, high through-put sequencing methods and analysis, microbial pathogenesis and host responses, metabolomics, metagenomics, metaproteomics, microbial ecology and diversity, microbial physiology, microbial ultra-structure, microscopic and imaging methods, molecular microbiology, mycology, novel mathematical microbiology and modelling, parasitology, plant-microbe interactions, protein markers/profiles, proteomics, pyrosequencing, public health microbiology, radioisotopes applied to microbiology, robotics applied to microbiological methods,rumen microbiology, microbiological methods for space missions and extreme environments, sampling methods and samplers, soil and sediment microbiology, transcriptomics, veterinary microbiology, sero-diagnostics and typing/identification.