“怎么样?”-调查医生在胚胎移植过程中的经验和随后的妊娠结局。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Sara C Pierpoint, Mary Peavey, Linnea Goodman
{"title":"“怎么样?”-调查医生在胚胎移植过程中的经验和随后的妊娠结局。","authors":"Sara C Pierpoint, Mary Peavey, Linnea Goodman","doi":"10.1007/s10815-025-03609-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research sought to investigate if a physician's experience of an embryo transfer (ET) correlates to rates of success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single experienced physician rated characteristics of ETs including ease of transfer (1-10), visibility (1-10), presence of blood, and amount of mucus (0-3) at the time of ET. Main outcomes were positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level 11 days post transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 365 transfers were rated. The average age of patients was 34.2 + / - 4.6 years. A total of 69.6% of cycles were programmed, and 73.2% of the transferred embryos underwent pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-a) prior to transfer. Average ease of transfer scores (9.3 + / - 1.7 vs 9.2 + / - 1.7; p = 0.71) and visibility scores (8.3 + / - 2.3 vs 8.1 + / - 2.8; p = 0.37) were similar between positive and negative pregnancy tests, respectively. Blood and mucus did not influence pregnancy rates. There was no correlation between ease of mock and actual embryo transfers. Multivariate logistic regression for positive bHCG demonstrated a significant predictive value for PGT-a (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.47-4.23). Ease of transfer (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.15), visibility (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15), mucus (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.30), and embryo age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) were not predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In experienced hands, physician subjective impressions of transfer characteristics were not significantly correlated with a successful transfer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"How did it go?\\\"-investigation of physician's experience during embryo transfer and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Sara C Pierpoint, Mary Peavey, Linnea Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10815-025-03609-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This research sought to investigate if a physician's experience of an embryo transfer (ET) correlates to rates of success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single experienced physician rated characteristics of ETs including ease of transfer (1-10), visibility (1-10), presence of blood, and amount of mucus (0-3) at the time of ET. Main outcomes were positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level 11 days post transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 365 transfers were rated. The average age of patients was 34.2 + / - 4.6 years. A total of 69.6% of cycles were programmed, and 73.2% of the transferred embryos underwent pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-a) prior to transfer. Average ease of transfer scores (9.3 + / - 1.7 vs 9.2 + / - 1.7; p = 0.71) and visibility scores (8.3 + / - 2.3 vs 8.1 + / - 2.8; p = 0.37) were similar between positive and negative pregnancy tests, respectively. Blood and mucus did not influence pregnancy rates. There was no correlation between ease of mock and actual embryo transfers. Multivariate logistic regression for positive bHCG demonstrated a significant predictive value for PGT-a (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.47-4.23). Ease of transfer (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.15), visibility (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15), mucus (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.30), and embryo age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) were not predictive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In experienced hands, physician subjective impressions of transfer characteristics were not significantly correlated with a successful transfer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03609-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-025-03609-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在调查医生对胚胎移植(ET)的经验是否与成功率相关。方法:由一位经验丰富的医生评定体外受精的特征,包括体外受精时的易移植性(1-10)、可视性(1-10)、血液存在和粘液量(0-3)。主要结果是移植后11天β -人绒毛膜促性腺激素水平阳性和持续妊娠率。结果:共评价365次转移。患者平均年龄34.2±4.6岁。总共69.6%的周期被编程,73.2%的移植胚胎在移植前进行了非整倍体(PGT-a)的植入前基因检测。平均易于传输得分(9.3 + / - 1.7 vs 9.2 + / - 1.7;p = 0.71)和可见性得分(8.3 + / - 2.3 vs 8.1 + / - 2.8;P = 0.37),阳性妊娠试验与阴性妊娠试验差异无统计学意义。血液和粘液对怀孕率没有影响。模拟胚胎移植和实际胚胎移植的容易程度之间没有相关性。多因素logistic回归显示bHCG阳性的PGT-a具有显著的预测价值(OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.47-4.23)。易移植性(OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.15)、可视性(OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15)、黏液(OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.30)和胚胎年龄(OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03)不具有预测性。结论:在经验丰富的患者手中,医生对转移特征的主观印象与成功转移没有显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"How did it go?"-investigation of physician's experience during embryo transfer and subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

Purpose: This research sought to investigate if a physician's experience of an embryo transfer (ET) correlates to rates of success.

Methods: A single experienced physician rated characteristics of ETs including ease of transfer (1-10), visibility (1-10), presence of blood, and amount of mucus (0-3) at the time of ET. Main outcomes were positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin level 11 days post transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate.

Results: A total of 365 transfers were rated. The average age of patients was 34.2 + / - 4.6 years. A total of 69.6% of cycles were programmed, and 73.2% of the transferred embryos underwent pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-a) prior to transfer. Average ease of transfer scores (9.3 + / - 1.7 vs 9.2 + / - 1.7; p = 0.71) and visibility scores (8.3 + / - 2.3 vs 8.1 + / - 2.8; p = 0.37) were similar between positive and negative pregnancy tests, respectively. Blood and mucus did not influence pregnancy rates. There was no correlation between ease of mock and actual embryo transfers. Multivariate logistic regression for positive bHCG demonstrated a significant predictive value for PGT-a (OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.47-4.23). Ease of transfer (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.88-1.15), visibility (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.94-1.15), mucus (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.77-1.30), and embryo age (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.92-1.03) were not predictive.

Conclusions: In experienced hands, physician subjective impressions of transfer characteristics were not significantly correlated with a successful transfer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
286
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics publishes cellular, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic discoveries advancing our understanding of the biology and underlying mechanisms from gametogenesis to offspring health. Special emphasis is placed on the practice and evolution of assisted reproduction technologies (ARTs) with reference to the diagnosis and management of diseases affecting fertility. Our goal is to educate our readership in the translation of basic and clinical discoveries made from human or relevant animal models to the safe and efficacious practice of human ARTs. The scientific rigor and ethical standards embraced by the JARG editorial team ensures a broad international base of expertise guiding the marriage of contemporary clinical research paradigms with basic science discovery. JARG publishes original papers, minireviews, case reports, and opinion pieces often combined into special topic issues that will educate clinicians and scientists with interests in the mechanisms of human development that bear on the treatment of infertility and emerging innovations in human ARTs. The guiding principles of male and female reproductive health impacting pre- and post-conceptional viability and developmental potential are emphasized within the purview of human reproductive health in current and future generations of our species. The journal is published in cooperation with the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, an organization of more than 8,000 physicians, researchers, nurses, technicians and other professionals dedicated to advancing knowledge and expertise in reproductive biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信