肌少症和PET成像指标在转移性非鳞状NSCLC中的预测价值。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Biomarkers in medicine Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-03 DOI:10.1080/17520363.2025.2540758
İsmet Seven, Mehmet Akif Karacan, Semanur Özsan Çelebi, İrfan Karahan, Kahraman Kapanşahin, Fahriye Tuğba Köş, Elif Özdemir, Doğan Uncu
{"title":"肌少症和PET成像指标在转移性非鳞状NSCLC中的预测价值。","authors":"İsmet Seven, Mehmet Akif Karacan, Semanur Özsan Çelebi, İrfan Karahan, Kahraman Kapanşahin, Fahriye Tuğba Köş, Elif Özdemir, Doğan Uncu","doi":"10.1080/17520363.2025.2540758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients face a poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of under 10%. In this investigation, we examined the prognostic implications of sarcopenia and metabolic metrics obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in individuals diagnosed with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (nsNSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The investigation included 124 individuals with metastatic nsNSCLC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging on diagnosis. Sarcopenia was determined by evaluating the skeletal muscle index at the L3 vertebral level. Metabolic metrics obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, maximum standard uptake, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were measured for whole body lesions (SUVmax_WB, MTV_WB, and TLG_WB) and primary tumors (SUVmax_T, MTV_T, and TLG_T). Primary endpoints examined were OS and the rate of sarcopenia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with sarcopenia, comprising 74.2% of the cohort, experienced a markedly reduced median OS of 4.7 months compared to 9.8 months in the non-sarcopenic cohort, which accounted for 25.8% of the population. Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia, as well as metabolic metrics, including SUVmax_T, MTV_T, TLG_T, and SUVmax_WB, were independent predictors of OS in metastatic nsNSCLC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of sarcopenia and unfavorable metabolic metrics on 18F-FDG PET/CT are linked to worse survival outcomes in metastatic nsNSCLC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9182,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"707-716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344796/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The predictive value of sarcopenia and PET imaging metrics in metastatic non-squamous NSCLC.\",\"authors\":\"İsmet Seven, Mehmet Akif Karacan, Semanur Özsan Çelebi, İrfan Karahan, Kahraman Kapanşahin, Fahriye Tuğba Köş, Elif Özdemir, Doğan Uncu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17520363.2025.2540758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients face a poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of under 10%. In this investigation, we examined the prognostic implications of sarcopenia and metabolic metrics obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in individuals diagnosed with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (nsNSCLC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The investigation included 124 individuals with metastatic nsNSCLC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging on diagnosis. Sarcopenia was determined by evaluating the skeletal muscle index at the L3 vertebral level. Metabolic metrics obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, maximum standard uptake, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were measured for whole body lesions (SUVmax_WB, MTV_WB, and TLG_WB) and primary tumors (SUVmax_T, MTV_T, and TLG_T). Primary endpoints examined were OS and the rate of sarcopenia diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with sarcopenia, comprising 74.2% of the cohort, experienced a markedly reduced median OS of 4.7 months compared to 9.8 months in the non-sarcopenic cohort, which accounted for 25.8% of the population. Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia, as well as metabolic metrics, including SUVmax_T, MTV_T, TLG_T, and SUVmax_WB, were independent predictors of OS in metastatic nsNSCLC patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of sarcopenia and unfavorable metabolic metrics on 18F-FDG PET/CT are linked to worse survival outcomes in metastatic nsNSCLC patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9182,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomarkers in medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"707-716\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12344796/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomarkers in medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2025.2540758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17520363.2025.2540758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者预后较差,5年总生存率(OS)低于10%。在这项研究中,我们研究了从18F-FDG PET/CT成像中获得的转移性非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(nsNSCLC)患者肌肉减少症和代谢指标的预后意义。方法:研究纳入124例转移性非snsclc患者,诊断时行18F-FDG PET/CT成像。通过评估L3椎体水平的骨骼肌指数来确定骨骼肌减少症。对全身病变(SUVmax_WB、MTV_WB和TLG_WB)和原发肿瘤(SUVmax_T、MTV_T和TLG_T)的代谢指标(18F-FDG PET/CT成像、最大标准摄取、代谢肿瘤体积和病变总糖酵解)进行测量。检查的主要终点是总生存率和肌肉减少症诊断率。结果:肌肉减少症患者占队列的74.2%,与占人口25.8%的非肌肉减少症患者的9.8个月相比,他们的中位OS显着降低了4.7个月。多变量分析显示,肌少症以及代谢指标,包括SUVmax_T、MTV_T、TLG_T和SUVmax_WB,是转移性nsNSCLC患者OS的独立预测因子。结论:在转移性nsNSCLC患者中,肌肉减少症和18F-FDG PET/CT上不良代谢指标的存在与较差的生存结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The predictive value of sarcopenia and PET imaging metrics in metastatic non-squamous NSCLC.

Aim: Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients face a poor prognosis, with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of under 10%. In this investigation, we examined the prognostic implications of sarcopenia and metabolic metrics obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in individuals diagnosed with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC (nsNSCLC).

Methods: The investigation included 124 individuals with metastatic nsNSCLC who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging on diagnosis. Sarcopenia was determined by evaluating the skeletal muscle index at the L3 vertebral level. Metabolic metrics obtained from 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, maximum standard uptake, metabolic tumor volume, and total lesion glycolysis were measured for whole body lesions (SUVmax_WB, MTV_WB, and TLG_WB) and primary tumors (SUVmax_T, MTV_T, and TLG_T). Primary endpoints examined were OS and the rate of sarcopenia diagnosis.

Results: Patients with sarcopenia, comprising 74.2% of the cohort, experienced a markedly reduced median OS of 4.7 months compared to 9.8 months in the non-sarcopenic cohort, which accounted for 25.8% of the population. Multivariate analysis revealed that sarcopenia, as well as metabolic metrics, including SUVmax_T, MTV_T, TLG_T, and SUVmax_WB, were independent predictors of OS in metastatic nsNSCLC patients.

Conclusion: The presence of sarcopenia and unfavorable metabolic metrics on 18F-FDG PET/CT are linked to worse survival outcomes in metastatic nsNSCLC patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomarkers in medicine
Biomarkers in medicine 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomarkers are physical, functional or biochemical indicators of physiological or disease processes. These key indicators can provide vital information in determining disease prognosis, in predicting of response to therapies, adverse events and drug interactions, and in establishing baseline risk. The explosion of interest in biomarker research is driving the development of new predictive, diagnostic and prognostic products in modern medical practice, and biomarkers are also playing an increasingly important role in the discovery and development of new drugs. For the full utility of biomarkers to be realized, we require greater understanding of disease mechanisms, and the interplay between disease mechanisms, therapeutic interventions and the proposed biomarkers. However, in attempting to evaluate the pros and cons of biomarkers systematically, we are moving into new, challenging territory. Biomarkers in Medicine (ISSN 1752-0363) is a peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal delivering commentary and analysis on the advances in our understanding of biomarkers and their potential and actual applications in medicine. The journal facilitates translation of our research knowledge into the clinic to increase the effectiveness of medical practice. As the scientific rationale and regulatory acceptance for biomarkers in medicine and in drug development become more fully established, Biomarkers in Medicine provides the platform for all players in this increasingly vital area to communicate and debate all issues relating to the potential utility and applications. Each issue includes a diversity of content to provide rounded coverage for the research professional. Articles include Guest Editorials, Interviews, Reviews, Research Articles, Perspectives, Priority Paper Evaluations, Special Reports, Case Reports, Conference Reports and Company Profiles. Review coverage is divided into themed sections according to area of therapeutic utility with some issues including themed sections on an area of topical interest. Biomarkers in Medicine provides a platform for commentary and debate for all professionals with an interest in the identification of biomarkers, elucidation of their role and formalization and approval of their application in modern medicine. The audience for Biomarkers in Medicine includes academic and industrial researchers, clinicians, pathologists, clinical chemists and regulatory professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信