Siyao Chen, Yuanyuan Xiao, Caixia Tan, Juan Zhou, Ting Liu, Sisi Zhang, Yiran Hu, Yang Liu, Ming Zheng, Letao Chen, Xinghui Gao, Yi-Wei Tang, Fred C Tenover, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li
{"title":"快速和可操作的鼻拭子筛查支持肺炎患者抗菌药物管理:一项前瞻性研究。","authors":"Siyao Chen, Yuanyuan Xiao, Caixia Tan, Juan Zhou, Ting Liu, Sisi Zhang, Yiran Hu, Yang Liu, Ming Zheng, Letao Chen, Xinghui Gao, Yi-Wei Tang, Fred C Tenover, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01615-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a rapid diagnostic tool with a high negative predictive value for pneumonia caused by MRSA. MRSA remains an important emerging pathogen in China and at present, there is little published data on the effect of rapid MRSA test results on antibiotic utilization for pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 300 inpatients who met the criteria of pneumonia in a tertiary general hospital were randomly assigned to a notification group (NG, n = 150) or a control group (CG, n = 150). Nasal swabs were collected and tested with the Xpert SA Nasal Complete Test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) to determine MRSA colonization status. Attending clinicians were immediately informed of test results for patients in NG while results were not released to an attending physician in CG. Subsequently, relevant medical records were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the NG received a shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy compared to the CG (5.66 vs. 7.87 days, P < 0.001). Fewer renal injuries (1.33% vs. 8%; P = 0.015), and lower costs of antimicrobial agents ($621.78 vs. $881.70; P = 0.013) were observed in NG patients compared to those in the CG. Further, this intervention did not increase the in-hospital mortality (12.67% vs. 16.67%, P = 0.327).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid and actionable MRSA PCR screening using nasal swabs helped reduce unnecessary anti-MRSA treatment. Early management of antimicrobials not only reduced the duration of anti-MRSA drug exposure but also antimicrobial-related adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rapid and actionable nasal-swab screening supports antimicrobial stewardship in patients with pneumonia: a prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Siyao Chen, Yuanyuan Xiao, Caixia Tan, Juan Zhou, Ting Liu, Sisi Zhang, Yiran Hu, Yang Liu, Ming Zheng, Letao Chen, Xinghui Gao, Yi-Wei Tang, Fred C Tenover, Anhua Wu, Chunhui Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13756-025-01615-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a rapid diagnostic tool with a high negative predictive value for pneumonia caused by MRSA. MRSA remains an important emerging pathogen in China and at present, there is little published data on the effect of rapid MRSA test results on antibiotic utilization for pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 300 inpatients who met the criteria of pneumonia in a tertiary general hospital were randomly assigned to a notification group (NG, n = 150) or a control group (CG, n = 150). Nasal swabs were collected and tested with the Xpert SA Nasal Complete Test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) to determine MRSA colonization status. Attending clinicians were immediately informed of test results for patients in NG while results were not released to an attending physician in CG. Subsequently, relevant medical records were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the NG received a shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy compared to the CG (5.66 vs. 7.87 days, P < 0.001). Fewer renal injuries (1.33% vs. 8%; P = 0.015), and lower costs of antimicrobial agents ($621.78 vs. $881.70; P = 0.013) were observed in NG patients compared to those in the CG. Further, this intervention did not increase the in-hospital mortality (12.67% vs. 16.67%, P = 0.327).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rapid and actionable MRSA PCR screening using nasal swabs helped reduce unnecessary anti-MRSA treatment. Early management of antimicrobials not only reduced the duration of anti-MRSA drug exposure but also antimicrobial-related adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12318421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01615-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01615-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:采用聚合酶链反应(PCR)对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)进行鼻腔筛查是一种快速诊断工具,对MRSA引起的肺炎具有较高的阴性预测值。MRSA在中国仍是一种重要的新发病原体,目前,关于MRSA快速检测结果对肺炎抗生素使用影响的公开数据很少。方法:选取某三级综合医院符合肺炎诊断标准的住院患者300例,随机分为通报组(NG, n = 150)和对照组(CG, n = 150)。收集鼻拭子并使用Xpert SA鼻腔完全测试(Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA)进行测试,以确定MRSA定植状态。NG患者的检测结果会立即告知主治医生,而CG患者的检测结果不会告知主治医生。随后,收集并分析了相关的医疗记录。结果:与对照组相比,NG组患者接受抗菌药物治疗的持续时间更短(5.66天对7.87天)。结论:使用鼻拭子进行快速和可操作的MRSA PCR筛查有助于减少不必要的抗MRSA治疗。抗菌药物的早期管理不仅减少了抗mrsa药物暴露的持续时间,而且减少了与抗菌药物相关的不良事件。
Rapid and actionable nasal-swab screening supports antimicrobial stewardship in patients with pneumonia: a prospective study.
Background: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal screening by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a rapid diagnostic tool with a high negative predictive value for pneumonia caused by MRSA. MRSA remains an important emerging pathogen in China and at present, there is little published data on the effect of rapid MRSA test results on antibiotic utilization for pneumonia.
Methods: A total of 300 inpatients who met the criteria of pneumonia in a tertiary general hospital were randomly assigned to a notification group (NG, n = 150) or a control group (CG, n = 150). Nasal swabs were collected and tested with the Xpert SA Nasal Complete Test (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) to determine MRSA colonization status. Attending clinicians were immediately informed of test results for patients in NG while results were not released to an attending physician in CG. Subsequently, relevant medical records were collected and analyzed.
Results: Patients in the NG received a shorter duration of antimicrobial therapy compared to the CG (5.66 vs. 7.87 days, P < 0.001). Fewer renal injuries (1.33% vs. 8%; P = 0.015), and lower costs of antimicrobial agents ($621.78 vs. $881.70; P = 0.013) were observed in NG patients compared to those in the CG. Further, this intervention did not increase the in-hospital mortality (12.67% vs. 16.67%, P = 0.327).
Conclusions: Rapid and actionable MRSA PCR screening using nasal swabs helped reduce unnecessary anti-MRSA treatment. Early management of antimicrobials not only reduced the duration of anti-MRSA drug exposure but also antimicrobial-related adverse events.
期刊介绍:
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.