资源、实施和手部卫生实践的表现及其对医院护理的影响:希腊的多中心横断面调查。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Eirini Astrinaki, Evangelos I Kritsotakis, Efsevia Vitsaxaki, Stamatina Saplamidou, Panagiotis Skevakis, Emmanouil Bolikas, Despoina Christofaki, Apostolia Salvaraki, Christos Kleovoulou, Styliani Papathanasaki, Chrisanthi Markopoulou, Evagelia Magouli, Diamantis Kofteridis, Petros Ioannou
{"title":"资源、实施和手部卫生实践的表现及其对医院护理的影响:希腊的多中心横断面调查。","authors":"Eirini Astrinaki, Evangelos I Kritsotakis, Efsevia Vitsaxaki, Stamatina Saplamidou, Panagiotis Skevakis, Emmanouil Bolikas, Despoina Christofaki, Apostolia Salvaraki, Christos Kleovoulou, Styliani Papathanasaki, Chrisanthi Markopoulou, Evagelia Magouli, Diamantis Kofteridis, Petros Ioannou","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist on hand hygiene practices in Greek hospitals. This study assessed hand hygiene resources, implementation, and compliance in 8 public hospitals and their impact on health care-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The World Health Organization's \"Ward Infrastructure Survey,\" \"Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework\" (HHSAF), and the \"5 Moments\" concept were employed. Hand hygiene indicators and BSI rates were assessed using Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handwashing facilities were provided in 87% of patient room toilets. Νearly, all sinks (96%) had soap, but disposable paper towels availability was 51%. Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability at the point of care was 41.8%. Hospitals scored at the \"Basic\" (n = 5, 62%) or \"Inadequate\" (n = 3, 38%) hand hygiene implementation level with a mean HHSAF score of 140. Compliance was 58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%) in 1 surveyed tertiary hospital but only 9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%) in 1 secondary. BSI rates in the wards were higher with higher ABHR availability (incidence rate ratio 1.09 per 10% increase in ABHR, P = .002) and when powdered gloves were not used (incidence rate ratio 2.09, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant hand hygiene compliance discrepancies and ineffective implementation strategies within surveyed hospitals were determined. Improving hand hygiene infrastructure, education, and feedback could foster current scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resources, implementation, and performance of hand hygiene practices and their impact on hospital care: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Greece.\",\"authors\":\"Eirini Astrinaki, Evangelos I Kritsotakis, Efsevia Vitsaxaki, Stamatina Saplamidou, Panagiotis Skevakis, Emmanouil Bolikas, Despoina Christofaki, Apostolia Salvaraki, Christos Kleovoulou, Styliani Papathanasaki, Chrisanthi Markopoulou, Evagelia Magouli, Diamantis Kofteridis, Petros Ioannou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist on hand hygiene practices in Greek hospitals. This study assessed hand hygiene resources, implementation, and compliance in 8 public hospitals and their impact on health care-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The World Health Organization's \\\"Ward Infrastructure Survey,\\\" \\\"Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework\\\" (HHSAF), and the \\\"5 Moments\\\" concept were employed. Hand hygiene indicators and BSI rates were assessed using Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Handwashing facilities were provided in 87% of patient room toilets. Νearly, all sinks (96%) had soap, but disposable paper towels availability was 51%. Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability at the point of care was 41.8%. Hospitals scored at the \\\"Basic\\\" (n = 5, 62%) or \\\"Inadequate\\\" (n = 3, 38%) hand hygiene implementation level with a mean HHSAF score of 140. Compliance was 58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%) in 1 surveyed tertiary hospital but only 9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%) in 1 secondary. BSI rates in the wards were higher with higher ABHR availability (incidence rate ratio 1.09 per 10% increase in ABHR, P = .002) and when powdered gloves were not used (incidence rate ratio 2.09, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant hand hygiene compliance discrepancies and ineffective implementation strategies within surveyed hospitals were determined. Improving hand hygiene infrastructure, education, and feedback could foster current scores.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.013","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于希腊医院手部卫生习惯的数据有限。本研究评估了八家公立医院的手卫生资源、实施和依从性及其对医疗保健相关血流感染(bsi)的影响。方法:采用世界卫生组织“病区基础设施调查”、“手卫生自评框架”(HHSAF)和“5 Moments”概念。采用泊松回归评估手卫生指标和BSI率。结果:87%的病房厕所设有洗手设施。Νearly所有水槽(96%)都有肥皂,但一次性纸巾的可用性为51%。在护理点,酒精基洗手液(ABHR)的可用性为41.8%。医院得分为“基本”(n=5;62%)或“不足”(n=3;38%)的手卫生执行水平,平均HHSAF得分为140分。一家受访三级医院的依从性为58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%),而一家二级医院的依从性仅为9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%)。ABHR可用性越高(发生率比(IRR)为1.09 / ABHR增加10% p=0.002)和未使用粉手套时,病房BSI率越高(IRR为2.09,p)。结论:调查医院的手卫生依从性存在显著差异,实施策略不有效。改善手部卫生基础设施、教育和反馈可以促进目前的得分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resources, implementation, and performance of hand hygiene practices and their impact on hospital care: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Greece.

Background: Limited data exist on hand hygiene practices in Greek hospitals. This study assessed hand hygiene resources, implementation, and compliance in 8 public hospitals and their impact on health care-associated bloodstream infections (BSIs).

Methods: The World Health Organization's "Ward Infrastructure Survey," "Hand Hygiene Self-Assessment Framework" (HHSAF), and the "5 Moments" concept were employed. Hand hygiene indicators and BSI rates were assessed using Poisson regression.

Results: Handwashing facilities were provided in 87% of patient room toilets. Νearly, all sinks (96%) had soap, but disposable paper towels availability was 51%. Alcohol-based hand rub (ABHR) availability at the point of care was 41.8%. Hospitals scored at the "Basic" (n = 5, 62%) or "Inadequate" (n = 3, 38%) hand hygiene implementation level with a mean HHSAF score of 140. Compliance was 58.8% (95% CI: 56.9%-60.6%) in 1 surveyed tertiary hospital but only 9.8% (95% CI: 8.7%-11%) in 1 secondary. BSI rates in the wards were higher with higher ABHR availability (incidence rate ratio 1.09 per 10% increase in ABHR, P = .002) and when powdered gloves were not used (incidence rate ratio 2.09, P < .001).

Conclusions: Significant hand hygiene compliance discrepancies and ineffective implementation strategies within surveyed hospitals were determined. Improving hand hygiene infrastructure, education, and feedback could foster current scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信