Manuel Sevilla-Ramos, Valentina Ladera, Ricardo García-García, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola
{"title":"首发精神病患者及其一级亲属的运动灵活性缺陷","authors":"Manuel Sevilla-Ramos, Valentina Ladera, Ricardo García-García, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola","doi":"10.1111/acps.13821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Motor dexterity deficits have been observed both before and during first-episode psychosis (FEP), suggesting this may be a potential endophenotype for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We aimed to compare motor dexterity performance in FEP patients, their first-degree relatives, and controls. We also investigated whether sociodemographic, premorbid, clinical, and cognitive factors contribute to motor dexterity.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 133 FEP patients, 244 of their first-degree relatives (146 parents, 98 siblings), and 202 controls. Motor dexterity was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test as part of a neuropsychological battery assessing verbal and visual memory, processing speed, working memory, executive function, attention, and theory of mind. Raw scores were converted to <i>Z</i>-scores. Intelligence quotient and global cognitive function were estimated. Group comparisons were made using analysis of covariance with post hoc tests. Age, sex, and years of education were included as covariates. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between motor dexterity and other variables within each group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a significant group difference on the Grooved Pegboard Test (<i>F</i> = 16.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001). FEP patients (M = −1.26) and their parents (M = −1.14) scored lowest, while siblings (M = −0.30) and controls (M = −0.22) scored highest. The FEP group also scored lowest on other cognitive tests (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A positive association between global cognitive function and Grooved Pegboard performance was found in all groups (<i>β</i> = 0.47–0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Group-specific associations with age, sex, education, intelligence, executive function, attention, and processing speed were also observed (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Motor dexterity deficits were observed in FEP patients and their parents, which may reflect underlying genetic liability or result from the disorder itself. The preserved motor dexterity in unaffected siblings challenges a strict endophenotypic interpretation and suggests a potential protective effect. Motor dexterity deficits were associated with broader cognitive impairment, intelligence quotient, attention, processing speed, and executive function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"152 3","pages":"216-227"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13821","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motor Dexterity Deficits in Individuals With First-Episode Psychosis and Their First-Degree Relatives\",\"authors\":\"Manuel Sevilla-Ramos, Valentina Ladera, Ricardo García-García, Rosa Ayesa-Arriola\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.13821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Motor dexterity deficits have been observed both before and during first-episode psychosis (FEP), suggesting this may be a potential endophenotype for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We aimed to compare motor dexterity performance in FEP patients, their first-degree relatives, and controls. We also investigated whether sociodemographic, premorbid, clinical, and cognitive factors contribute to motor dexterity.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sample included 133 FEP patients, 244 of their first-degree relatives (146 parents, 98 siblings), and 202 controls. Motor dexterity was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test as part of a neuropsychological battery assessing verbal and visual memory, processing speed, working memory, executive function, attention, and theory of mind. Raw scores were converted to <i>Z</i>-scores. Intelligence quotient and global cognitive function were estimated. Group comparisons were made using analysis of covariance with post hoc tests. Age, sex, and years of education were included as covariates. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between motor dexterity and other variables within each group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was a significant group difference on the Grooved Pegboard Test (<i>F</i> = 16.25, <i>p</i> < 0.001). FEP patients (M = −1.26) and their parents (M = −1.14) scored lowest, while siblings (M = −0.30) and controls (M = −0.22) scored highest. The FEP group also scored lowest on other cognitive tests (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A positive association between global cognitive function and Grooved Pegboard performance was found in all groups (<i>β</i> = 0.47–0.84, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Group-specific associations with age, sex, education, intelligence, executive function, attention, and processing speed were also observed (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Motor dexterity deficits were observed in FEP patients and their parents, which may reflect underlying genetic liability or result from the disorder itself. The preserved motor dexterity in unaffected siblings challenges a strict endophenotypic interpretation and suggests a potential protective effect. Motor dexterity deficits were associated with broader cognitive impairment, intelligence quotient, attention, processing speed, and executive function.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"152 3\",\"pages\":\"216-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/acps.13821\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13821\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acps.13821","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Motor Dexterity Deficits in Individuals With First-Episode Psychosis and Their First-Degree Relatives
Introduction
Motor dexterity deficits have been observed both before and during first-episode psychosis (FEP), suggesting this may be a potential endophenotype for schizophrenia spectrum disorders. We aimed to compare motor dexterity performance in FEP patients, their first-degree relatives, and controls. We also investigated whether sociodemographic, premorbid, clinical, and cognitive factors contribute to motor dexterity.
Methods
The sample included 133 FEP patients, 244 of their first-degree relatives (146 parents, 98 siblings), and 202 controls. Motor dexterity was assessed using the Grooved Pegboard Test as part of a neuropsychological battery assessing verbal and visual memory, processing speed, working memory, executive function, attention, and theory of mind. Raw scores were converted to Z-scores. Intelligence quotient and global cognitive function were estimated. Group comparisons were made using analysis of covariance with post hoc tests. Age, sex, and years of education were included as covariates. Multiple linear regression models examined associations between motor dexterity and other variables within each group.
Results
There was a significant group difference on the Grooved Pegboard Test (F = 16.25, p < 0.001). FEP patients (M = −1.26) and their parents (M = −1.14) scored lowest, while siblings (M = −0.30) and controls (M = −0.22) scored highest. The FEP group also scored lowest on other cognitive tests (p < 0.001). A positive association between global cognitive function and Grooved Pegboard performance was found in all groups (β = 0.47–0.84, p < 0.001). Group-specific associations with age, sex, education, intelligence, executive function, attention, and processing speed were also observed (p < 0.05).
Conclusions
Motor dexterity deficits were observed in FEP patients and their parents, which may reflect underlying genetic liability or result from the disorder itself. The preserved motor dexterity in unaffected siblings challenges a strict endophenotypic interpretation and suggests a potential protective effect. Motor dexterity deficits were associated with broader cognitive impairment, intelligence quotient, attention, processing speed, and executive function.
期刊介绍:
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers.
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.