Hallgeir Sjåstad, Siv Skard, Helge Thorbjørnsen, Elisabeth Norman
{"title":"幸福预测中的自我服务乐观主义:人们相信自己和朋友的光明未来,但不相信敌人的光明未来","authors":"Hallgeir Sjåstad, Siv Skard, Helge Thorbjørnsen, Elisabeth Norman","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.3164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Psychological well-being is remarkably stable over time. However, people may still <i>believe </i>that the future will deviate from the past. Across four experiments in Norway and the United States (<i>N</i> = 1,827), participants were randomly assigned to report their well-being in the past or predict their future well-being. In line with a “bright-future hypothesis”, people predicted higher levels of happiness and meaning in the future than in their historical baseline. We observed the same optimistic pattern for a 1-year as a 5-year time horizon. Rather than reflecting a past-neglecting cognitive mechanism, the evidence mostly favored a motivational explanation. First, the effect emerged both between-subjects and within-subjects: Even when people had just reported their past well-being, they still predicted future improvement. Second, predicted well-being improvement generalized to social judgments of a friend but not to an enemy, mediated by judgments of deservingness. In conclusion, people predict a bright future when they <i>want</i> to see one.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"55 5","pages":"747-761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.3164","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Serving Optimism in Well-Being Prediction: People Believe in a Bright Future for Themselves and Their Friends, but Not for Their Enemies\",\"authors\":\"Hallgeir Sjåstad, Siv Skard, Helge Thorbjørnsen, Elisabeth Norman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsp.3164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Psychological well-being is remarkably stable over time. However, people may still <i>believe </i>that the future will deviate from the past. Across four experiments in Norway and the United States (<i>N</i> = 1,827), participants were randomly assigned to report their well-being in the past or predict their future well-being. In line with a “bright-future hypothesis”, people predicted higher levels of happiness and meaning in the future than in their historical baseline. We observed the same optimistic pattern for a 1-year as a 5-year time horizon. Rather than reflecting a past-neglecting cognitive mechanism, the evidence mostly favored a motivational explanation. First, the effect emerged both between-subjects and within-subjects: Even when people had just reported their past well-being, they still predicted future improvement. Second, predicted well-being improvement generalized to social judgments of a friend but not to an enemy, mediated by judgments of deservingness. In conclusion, people predict a bright future when they <i>want</i> to see one.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"747-761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.3164\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3164\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-Serving Optimism in Well-Being Prediction: People Believe in a Bright Future for Themselves and Their Friends, but Not for Their Enemies
Psychological well-being is remarkably stable over time. However, people may still believe that the future will deviate from the past. Across four experiments in Norway and the United States (N = 1,827), participants were randomly assigned to report their well-being in the past or predict their future well-being. In line with a “bright-future hypothesis”, people predicted higher levels of happiness and meaning in the future than in their historical baseline. We observed the same optimistic pattern for a 1-year as a 5-year time horizon. Rather than reflecting a past-neglecting cognitive mechanism, the evidence mostly favored a motivational explanation. First, the effect emerged both between-subjects and within-subjects: Even when people had just reported their past well-being, they still predicted future improvement. Second, predicted well-being improvement generalized to social judgments of a friend but not to an enemy, mediated by judgments of deservingness. In conclusion, people predict a bright future when they want to see one.
期刊介绍:
Topics covered include, among others, intergroup relations, group processes, social cognition, attitudes, social influence and persuasion, self and identity, verbal and nonverbal communication, language and thought, affect and emotion, embodied and situated cognition and individual differences of social-psychological relevance. Together with original research articles, the European Journal of Social Psychology"s innovative and inclusive style is reflected in the variety of articles published: Research Article: Original articles that provide a significant contribution to the understanding of social phenomena, up to a maximum of 12,000 words in length.