幸福预测中的自我服务乐观主义:人们相信自己和朋友的光明未来,但不相信敌人的光明未来

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Hallgeir Sjåstad, Siv Skard, Helge Thorbjørnsen, Elisabeth Norman
{"title":"幸福预测中的自我服务乐观主义:人们相信自己和朋友的光明未来,但不相信敌人的光明未来","authors":"Hallgeir Sjåstad,&nbsp;Siv Skard,&nbsp;Helge Thorbjørnsen,&nbsp;Elisabeth Norman","doi":"10.1002/ejsp.3164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Psychological well-being is remarkably stable over time. However, people may still <i>believe </i>that the future will deviate from the past. Across four experiments in Norway and the United States (<i>N</i> = 1,827), participants were randomly assigned to report their well-being in the past or predict their future well-being. In line with a “bright-future hypothesis”, people predicted higher levels of happiness and meaning in the future than in their historical baseline. We observed the same optimistic pattern for a 1-year as a 5-year time horizon. Rather than reflecting a past-neglecting cognitive mechanism, the evidence mostly favored a motivational explanation. First, the effect emerged both between-subjects and within-subjects: Even when people had just reported their past well-being, they still predicted future improvement. Second, predicted well-being improvement generalized to social judgments of a friend but not to an enemy, mediated by judgments of deservingness. In conclusion, people predict a bright future when they <i>want</i> to see one.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48377,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social Psychology","volume":"55 5","pages":"747-761"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.3164","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-Serving Optimism in Well-Being Prediction: People Believe in a Bright Future for Themselves and Their Friends, but Not for Their Enemies\",\"authors\":\"Hallgeir Sjåstad,&nbsp;Siv Skard,&nbsp;Helge Thorbjørnsen,&nbsp;Elisabeth Norman\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ejsp.3164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Psychological well-being is remarkably stable over time. However, people may still <i>believe </i>that the future will deviate from the past. Across four experiments in Norway and the United States (<i>N</i> = 1,827), participants were randomly assigned to report their well-being in the past or predict their future well-being. In line with a “bright-future hypothesis”, people predicted higher levels of happiness and meaning in the future than in their historical baseline. We observed the same optimistic pattern for a 1-year as a 5-year time horizon. Rather than reflecting a past-neglecting cognitive mechanism, the evidence mostly favored a motivational explanation. First, the effect emerged both between-subjects and within-subjects: Even when people had just reported their past well-being, they still predicted future improvement. Second, predicted well-being improvement generalized to social judgments of a friend but not to an enemy, mediated by judgments of deservingness. In conclusion, people predict a bright future when they <i>want</i> to see one.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Social Psychology\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"747-761\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejsp.3164\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Social Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3164\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.3164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着时间的推移,心理健康非常稳定。然而,人们可能仍然相信未来会偏离过去。在挪威和美国的四个实验中(N = 1827),参与者被随机分配报告他们过去的幸福或预测他们未来的幸福。根据“光明未来假说”,人们对未来的幸福感和意义的预测高于历史基线。我们在1年和5年的时间范围内观察到同样的乐观模式。证据大多支持动机解释,而不是反映了一种忽视过去的认知机制。首先,研究对象之间和研究对象内部都存在这种影响:即使人们刚刚报告了他们过去的幸福,他们仍然预测未来会有所改善。其次,预测的幸福改善推广到对朋友的社会判断,而不是对敌人的社会判断,由对应得性的判断作为中介。总之,当人们想要看到一个光明的未来时,他们就会预测一个光明的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-Serving Optimism in Well-Being Prediction: People Believe in a Bright Future for Themselves and Their Friends, but Not for Their Enemies

Psychological well-being is remarkably stable over time. However, people may still believe that the future will deviate from the past. Across four experiments in Norway and the United States (N = 1,827), participants were randomly assigned to report their well-being in the past or predict their future well-being. In line with a “bright-future hypothesis”, people predicted higher levels of happiness and meaning in the future than in their historical baseline. We observed the same optimistic pattern for a 1-year as a 5-year time horizon. Rather than reflecting a past-neglecting cognitive mechanism, the evidence mostly favored a motivational explanation. First, the effect emerged both between-subjects and within-subjects: Even when people had just reported their past well-being, they still predicted future improvement. Second, predicted well-being improvement generalized to social judgments of a friend but not to an enemy, mediated by judgments of deservingness. In conclusion, people predict a bright future when they want to see one.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Topics covered include, among others, intergroup relations, group processes, social cognition, attitudes, social influence and persuasion, self and identity, verbal and nonverbal communication, language and thought, affect and emotion, embodied and situated cognition and individual differences of social-psychological relevance. Together with original research articles, the European Journal of Social Psychology"s innovative and inclusive style is reflected in the variety of articles published: Research Article: Original articles that provide a significant contribution to the understanding of social phenomena, up to a maximum of 12,000 words in length.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信