模拟降雨条件下作物覆盖与耕作对径流泥沙动态的影响——以东北黑土区为例

IF 2.9 3区 地球科学 Q1 Environmental Science
Xiaoqiong Chen, Zhuodong Zhang, Bo Chen, Yintong Zhang, Peiting He
{"title":"模拟降雨条件下作物覆盖与耕作对径流泥沙动态的影响——以东北黑土区为例","authors":"Xiaoqiong Chen,&nbsp;Zhuodong Zhang,&nbsp;Bo Chen,&nbsp;Yintong Zhang,&nbsp;Peiting He","doi":"10.1002/hyp.70231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>We conducted 24 in situ simulated rainfall experiments featuring variable intensity over nine cropland plots subject to three tillage practices in the black soil region of Northeast China. The experimental setup involved eight scenarios, incorporating combinations of complete and zero crop cover, hourly rainfall amounts of 45 and 65 mm, and dry and wet antecedent soil moisture conditions. Our experiment shows that, compared to up and down the slope tillage (UDST) plots: (1) In the analysis aggregating multiple rainfall-runoff event data, contour tillage (CT) plots showed a notable increase in the reduction rates of total runoff, peak discharge and peak sediment concentration as crop cover increased from zero to complete. Specifically, reductions rose from 18%, 6% and 80% to 67%, 56% and 85%, respectively. In contrast, flat tillage (FT) plots showed a transition in total runoff and peak discharge from slightly more to slightly less, with a notable increase in peak sediment concentration reduction from 28% to 45% and (2) Analyses of individual events indicate that the ratio of total runoff, peak discharge and peak sediment concentration over CT plots compared to UDST plots range approximately in [6%, 100%], [6%, 100%] and [10%, 30%], these ratios over FT plots range in [60%, 130%], [60%, 130%] and [30%, 80%]. These data suggest that increased crop cover tends to amplify the total runoff and peak discharge reduction effects of tillage practices, and the runoff and sediment reduction rates vary notably across individual rainfall-runoff events. Additionally, both the magnitudes of amplification and variability depend on specific tillage practices employed. Notably, changes in crop cover have a more substantial impact on the runoff and sediment reduction effectiveness than variations in rainfall intensity and antecedent soil moisture. The necessity of employing in situ simulated rainfall experiments were also discussed. These findings highlight the interplay of crop cover and tillage on cropland runoff and sediment dynamics, offering valuable insights into improving soil and water conservation strategies.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13189,"journal":{"name":"Hydrological Processes","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interplay of Crop Cover and Tillage on Runoff and Sediment Dynamics Under Simulated Rainfall: A Case Study in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoqiong Chen,&nbsp;Zhuodong Zhang,&nbsp;Bo Chen,&nbsp;Yintong Zhang,&nbsp;Peiting He\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hyp.70231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>We conducted 24 in situ simulated rainfall experiments featuring variable intensity over nine cropland plots subject to three tillage practices in the black soil region of Northeast China. The experimental setup involved eight scenarios, incorporating combinations of complete and zero crop cover, hourly rainfall amounts of 45 and 65 mm, and dry and wet antecedent soil moisture conditions. Our experiment shows that, compared to up and down the slope tillage (UDST) plots: (1) In the analysis aggregating multiple rainfall-runoff event data, contour tillage (CT) plots showed a notable increase in the reduction rates of total runoff, peak discharge and peak sediment concentration as crop cover increased from zero to complete. Specifically, reductions rose from 18%, 6% and 80% to 67%, 56% and 85%, respectively. In contrast, flat tillage (FT) plots showed a transition in total runoff and peak discharge from slightly more to slightly less, with a notable increase in peak sediment concentration reduction from 28% to 45% and (2) Analyses of individual events indicate that the ratio of total runoff, peak discharge and peak sediment concentration over CT plots compared to UDST plots range approximately in [6%, 100%], [6%, 100%] and [10%, 30%], these ratios over FT plots range in [60%, 130%], [60%, 130%] and [30%, 80%]. These data suggest that increased crop cover tends to amplify the total runoff and peak discharge reduction effects of tillage practices, and the runoff and sediment reduction rates vary notably across individual rainfall-runoff events. Additionally, both the magnitudes of amplification and variability depend on specific tillage practices employed. Notably, changes in crop cover have a more substantial impact on the runoff and sediment reduction effectiveness than variations in rainfall intensity and antecedent soil moisture. The necessity of employing in situ simulated rainfall experiments were also discussed. These findings highlight the interplay of crop cover and tillage on cropland runoff and sediment dynamics, offering valuable insights into improving soil and water conservation strategies.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"volume\":\"39 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrological Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hyp.70231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在东北黑土区9个不同耕作方式的农田上进行了24次变强度的原位模拟降雨试验。实验设置包括8个场景,包括完全和零作物覆盖,每小时降雨量45和65毫米,干燥和潮湿的土壤湿度条件的组合。我们的实验表明,与上下坡耕(UDST)样地相比:(1)在聚合多个降雨径流事件数据的分析中,等高线耕作(CT)样地显示,随着作物覆盖从零增加到完全,总径流量、峰值流量和峰值沉积物浓度的减少率显著增加。具体来说,减幅分别从18%、6%和80%上升到67%、56%和85%。相比之下,平坦耕作(FT)样地的总径流量和峰值流量从略多向略少转变,峰值含沙量减少从28%显著增加到45%。(2)个体事件分析表明,与UDST样地相比,CT样地的总径流量、峰值流量和峰值含沙量的比值大约在[6%,100%]、[6%,100%]和[10%,30%]之间,这些比值在FT样地的范围分别为[60%,130%]、[60%,130%][30%, 80%]。这些数据表明,增加的作物覆盖倾向于放大耕作方式的总径流和峰值流量减少效应,径流和沉积物减少率在个别降雨-径流事件中差异显著。此外,放大和变异的幅度取决于所采用的具体耕作方法。值得注意的是,与降雨强度和前期土壤湿度变化相比,作物覆盖变化对径流和泥沙减少效果的影响更大。讨论了采用现场模拟降雨试验的必要性。这些发现强调了作物覆盖和耕作对农田径流和沉积物动态的相互作用,为改善水土保持策略提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Interplay of Crop Cover and Tillage on Runoff and Sediment Dynamics Under Simulated Rainfall: A Case Study in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China

Interplay of Crop Cover and Tillage on Runoff and Sediment Dynamics Under Simulated Rainfall: A Case Study in the Black Soil Region of Northeast China

We conducted 24 in situ simulated rainfall experiments featuring variable intensity over nine cropland plots subject to three tillage practices in the black soil region of Northeast China. The experimental setup involved eight scenarios, incorporating combinations of complete and zero crop cover, hourly rainfall amounts of 45 and 65 mm, and dry and wet antecedent soil moisture conditions. Our experiment shows that, compared to up and down the slope tillage (UDST) plots: (1) In the analysis aggregating multiple rainfall-runoff event data, contour tillage (CT) plots showed a notable increase in the reduction rates of total runoff, peak discharge and peak sediment concentration as crop cover increased from zero to complete. Specifically, reductions rose from 18%, 6% and 80% to 67%, 56% and 85%, respectively. In contrast, flat tillage (FT) plots showed a transition in total runoff and peak discharge from slightly more to slightly less, with a notable increase in peak sediment concentration reduction from 28% to 45% and (2) Analyses of individual events indicate that the ratio of total runoff, peak discharge and peak sediment concentration over CT plots compared to UDST plots range approximately in [6%, 100%], [6%, 100%] and [10%, 30%], these ratios over FT plots range in [60%, 130%], [60%, 130%] and [30%, 80%]. These data suggest that increased crop cover tends to amplify the total runoff and peak discharge reduction effects of tillage practices, and the runoff and sediment reduction rates vary notably across individual rainfall-runoff events. Additionally, both the magnitudes of amplification and variability depend on specific tillage practices employed. Notably, changes in crop cover have a more substantial impact on the runoff and sediment reduction effectiveness than variations in rainfall intensity and antecedent soil moisture. The necessity of employing in situ simulated rainfall experiments were also discussed. These findings highlight the interplay of crop cover and tillage on cropland runoff and sediment dynamics, offering valuable insights into improving soil and water conservation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hydrological Processes
Hydrological Processes 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
313
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Hydrological Processes is an international journal that publishes original scientific papers advancing understanding of the mechanisms underlying the movement and storage of water in the environment, and the interaction of water with geological, biogeochemical, atmospheric and ecological systems. Not all papers related to water resources are appropriate for submission to this journal; rather we seek papers that clearly articulate the role(s) of hydrological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信