Sarah Wilesmith, Allison Mandrusiak, Ray Lang, Romany Martin, Andric Lu, Roma Forbes
{"title":"培养和提高卫生专业学生临床文献技能的教育干预:系统综述","authors":"Sarah Wilesmith, Allison Mandrusiak, Ray Lang, Romany Martin, Andric Lu, Roma Forbes","doi":"10.1111/tct.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical documentation is necessary for effective and safe healthcare practice. This paper systematically reviewed educational interventions aimed at developing entry-level health professional students' clinical documentation skills.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane) from January 2000 to May 2023 was performed, with additional forward and backward citation searching. Inclusion was limited to original manuscripts published in English from January 2000, reporting an experimental or quasi-experimental design and using objective performance-based measures. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), with narrative synthesis of results due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of 5313 records identified, 29 studies were eligible for inclusion. The health professions represented were medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, psychology and veterinary science. Teaching methodologies included the following: didactic instruction; provision of templates, guidelines and/or examples; instructor-led group discussion; individual or group instructor feedback; near-peer or peer feedback; self-evaluation; writing practice activities; worked examples; and response-to-stimulus writing activities (written, video or live standardised patient cases). Research quality was low in MERSQI domains of ‘<i>study design</i>’ and ‘<i>validity of evaluation instruments</i>’.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Several training methods appear valuable in developing student skills in clinical documentation; however, high-quality evaluation of documentation training interventions is lacking. Future research is recommended to compare existing methods of documentation training and to evaluate training in underexplored healthcare disciplines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70157","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Educational Interventions to Develop and Enhance Clinical Documentation Skills in Health Professional Students: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Wilesmith, Allison Mandrusiak, Ray Lang, Romany Martin, Andric Lu, Roma Forbes\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/tct.70157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinical documentation is necessary for effective and safe healthcare practice. This paper systematically reviewed educational interventions aimed at developing entry-level health professional students' clinical documentation skills.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane) from January 2000 to May 2023 was performed, with additional forward and backward citation searching. Inclusion was limited to original manuscripts published in English from January 2000, reporting an experimental or quasi-experimental design and using objective performance-based measures. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), with narrative synthesis of results due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of 5313 records identified, 29 studies were eligible for inclusion. The health professions represented were medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, psychology and veterinary science. Teaching methodologies included the following: didactic instruction; provision of templates, guidelines and/or examples; instructor-led group discussion; individual or group instructor feedback; near-peer or peer feedback; self-evaluation; writing practice activities; worked examples; and response-to-stimulus writing activities (written, video or live standardised patient cases). Research quality was low in MERSQI domains of ‘<i>study design</i>’ and ‘<i>validity of evaluation instruments</i>’.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Several training methods appear valuable in developing student skills in clinical documentation; however, high-quality evaluation of documentation training interventions is lacking. Future research is recommended to compare existing methods of documentation training and to evaluate training in underexplored healthcare disciplines.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"volume\":\"22 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/tct.70157\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://asmepublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Educational Interventions to Develop and Enhance Clinical Documentation Skills in Health Professional Students: A Systematic Review
Background
Clinical documentation is necessary for effective and safe healthcare practice. This paper systematically reviewed educational interventions aimed at developing entry-level health professional students' clinical documentation skills.
Methods
A systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and Cochrane) from January 2000 to May 2023 was performed, with additional forward and backward citation searching. Inclusion was limited to original manuscripts published in English from January 2000, reporting an experimental or quasi-experimental design and using objective performance-based measures. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument (MERSQI), with narrative synthesis of results due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures.
Results
Of 5313 records identified, 29 studies were eligible for inclusion. The health professions represented were medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, psychology and veterinary science. Teaching methodologies included the following: didactic instruction; provision of templates, guidelines and/or examples; instructor-led group discussion; individual or group instructor feedback; near-peer or peer feedback; self-evaluation; writing practice activities; worked examples; and response-to-stimulus writing activities (written, video or live standardised patient cases). Research quality was low in MERSQI domains of ‘study design’ and ‘validity of evaluation instruments’.
Conclusion
Several training methods appear valuable in developing student skills in clinical documentation; however, high-quality evaluation of documentation training interventions is lacking. Future research is recommended to compare existing methods of documentation training and to evaluate training in underexplored healthcare disciplines.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.