垂直向上气液固三相流的流型及体积相分数分析

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Ronaldo Luís Höhn, Abderraouf Arabi, Sylvana Verónica Varela Ballesta, Paolo Juan Sassi, Jordi Pallarès, Youssef Stiriba
{"title":"垂直向上气液固三相流的流型及体积相分数分析","authors":"Ronaldo Luís Höhn,&nbsp;Abderraouf Arabi,&nbsp;Sylvana Verónica Varela Ballesta,&nbsp;Paolo Juan Sassi,&nbsp;Jordi Pallarès,&nbsp;Youssef Stiriba","doi":"10.1002/cjce.25663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gas–liquid–solid flows are important in many industrial productions and processes. The hydrodynamic of gas–liquid–solid three-phase vertical upward flows and how the presence of solid particles may affect the two-phase flow system properties are less investigated and understood compared to gas–liquid two-phase flow. The present study is an attempt to bridge this gap in vertical pipe through an experimental investigation of flow regimes and volumetric holdup with solid particles less dense than liquid phase, similar to hydrates. The experiments are carried out using air–water and polypropylene pellets solid particles and a 30 mm ID vertical pipe. Three solid volumetric concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) were investigated, and the results are compared with those obtained with gas–liquid two-phase flow. In the conditions of experimental measurements carried out, four flow regimes, namely cap bubble-to-slug, slug, churn, and dispersed bubble flows, were reported. These flow regimes were observed on both two-phase and three-phase flow conditions. Meanwhile, the injection of solids induced a shift of slug-to-churn flow transition. The study allows notably to prove that the existing predictive models of flow transition and liquid holdup developed for two-phase flow can be extended to three-phase flow by considering the gas–liquid–solid three-phase as gas–slurry two-phase flow.</p>","PeriodicalId":9400,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"103 9","pages":"4513-4539"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of flow regimes and volumetric phase fraction of vertical upward gas–liquid–solid three-phase flow\",\"authors\":\"Ronaldo Luís Höhn,&nbsp;Abderraouf Arabi,&nbsp;Sylvana Verónica Varela Ballesta,&nbsp;Paolo Juan Sassi,&nbsp;Jordi Pallarès,&nbsp;Youssef Stiriba\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjce.25663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Gas–liquid–solid flows are important in many industrial productions and processes. The hydrodynamic of gas–liquid–solid three-phase vertical upward flows and how the presence of solid particles may affect the two-phase flow system properties are less investigated and understood compared to gas–liquid two-phase flow. The present study is an attempt to bridge this gap in vertical pipe through an experimental investigation of flow regimes and volumetric holdup with solid particles less dense than liquid phase, similar to hydrates. The experiments are carried out using air–water and polypropylene pellets solid particles and a 30 mm ID vertical pipe. Three solid volumetric concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) were investigated, and the results are compared with those obtained with gas–liquid two-phase flow. In the conditions of experimental measurements carried out, four flow regimes, namely cap bubble-to-slug, slug, churn, and dispersed bubble flows, were reported. These flow regimes were observed on both two-phase and three-phase flow conditions. Meanwhile, the injection of solids induced a shift of slug-to-churn flow transition. The study allows notably to prove that the existing predictive models of flow transition and liquid holdup developed for two-phase flow can be extended to three-phase flow by considering the gas–liquid–solid three-phase as gas–slurry two-phase flow.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"103 9\",\"pages\":\"4513-4539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25663\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjce.25663","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

气-液-固流动在许多工业生产和过程中都很重要。与气液两相流相比,气液固三相垂直向上流动的流体力学以及固体颗粒的存在如何影响两相流系统的特性研究和理解较少。目前的研究试图通过实验研究流动状态和体积含率,在垂直管道中弥合这种差距,固体颗粒密度低于液相,类似于水合物。实验采用空气-水和聚丙烯球团固体颗粒和内径为30mm的垂直管进行。研究了固体体积浓度为5%、10%和20%的情况,并与气液两相流的结果进行了比较。在进行的实验测量条件下,报告了四种流动形式,即帽泡-段塞流、段塞流、搅拌流和分散气泡流。在两相和三相流动条件下观察了这些流动形式。同时,固体的注入引起了段塞流到搅拌流的转变。该研究显著地证明了将气-液-固三相视为气-浆两相流,可以将现有的两相流的流动过渡和含率预测模型推广到三相流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of flow regimes and volumetric phase fraction of vertical upward gas–liquid–solid three-phase flow

Gas–liquid–solid flows are important in many industrial productions and processes. The hydrodynamic of gas–liquid–solid three-phase vertical upward flows and how the presence of solid particles may affect the two-phase flow system properties are less investigated and understood compared to gas–liquid two-phase flow. The present study is an attempt to bridge this gap in vertical pipe through an experimental investigation of flow regimes and volumetric holdup with solid particles less dense than liquid phase, similar to hydrates. The experiments are carried out using air–water and polypropylene pellets solid particles and a 30 mm ID vertical pipe. Three solid volumetric concentrations (5%, 10%, and 20%) were investigated, and the results are compared with those obtained with gas–liquid two-phase flow. In the conditions of experimental measurements carried out, four flow regimes, namely cap bubble-to-slug, slug, churn, and dispersed bubble flows, were reported. These flow regimes were observed on both two-phase and three-phase flow conditions. Meanwhile, the injection of solids induced a shift of slug-to-churn flow transition. The study allows notably to prove that the existing predictive models of flow transition and liquid holdup developed for two-phase flow can be extended to three-phase flow by considering the gas–liquid–solid three-phase as gas–slurry two-phase flow.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
448
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering (CJChE) publishes original research articles, new theoretical interpretation or experimental findings and critical reviews in the science or industrial practice of chemical and biochemical processes. Preference is given to papers having a clearly indicated scope and applicability in any of the following areas: Fluid mechanics, heat and mass transfer, multiphase flows, separations processes, thermodynamics, process systems engineering, reactors and reaction kinetics, catalysis, interfacial phenomena, electrochemical phenomena, bioengineering, minerals processing and natural products and environmental and energy engineering. Papers that merely describe or present a conventional or routine analysis of existing processes will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信