用于临床和结构性膝骨关节炎预测的机器学习模型:最新进展和未来方向

IF 2.8
Gabby B. Joseph , Charles E. McCulloch , Michael C. Nevitt , Nancy E. Lane , Sharmila Majumdar , Thomas M. Link
{"title":"用于临床和结构性膝骨关节炎预测的机器学习模型:最新进展和未来方向","authors":"Gabby B. Joseph ,&nbsp;Charles E. McCulloch ,&nbsp;Michael C. Nevitt ,&nbsp;Nancy E. Lane ,&nbsp;Sharmila Majumdar ,&nbsp;Thomas M. Link","doi":"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Machine learning (ML), increasingly used for predictive modeling, has seen rapid growth in osteoarthritis (OA) research over the past decade. This review highlights recent advances in ML model development across four OA outcome domains: clinical, structural (radiographic and MRI-based), and surgical endpoints, each addressing different but interrelated aspects of the disease.</div><div>For clinical outcomes, ML studies have focused on predicting changes in patient-reported clinical measures (e.g., pain and function). Radiographic OA has been characterized using deep learning (DL) models, and ML approaches have also been used to predict progression of Kellgren Lawrence grades and joint space narrowing. For MRI-based features, DL-based tools have been developed for automatic quantification of cartilage, bone marrow lesions, and subcutaneous fat; they have improved scalability and supported development of ML prediction models with cartilage loss outcomes. For total knee replacement outcomes, ML models have demonstrated strong performance, offering the potential for both early intervention and surgical planning.</div><div>This review also discusses emerging directions for ML in OA research, including the integration of multimodal data sources, the development of interpretable and explainable ML models, and the use of automated ML to streamline model development. Future approaches may include OA subtype-specific prediction models, alignment of ML approaches with clinical workflows, and enhanced external validation to ensure generalizability. These evolving strategies underscore the growing potential of ML to improve the detection of early OA, individualized risk stratification, and personalized interventions in OA clinical care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74377,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100654"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine learning models for clinical and structural knee osteoarthritis prediction: Recent advancements and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Gabby B. Joseph ,&nbsp;Charles E. McCulloch ,&nbsp;Michael C. Nevitt ,&nbsp;Nancy E. Lane ,&nbsp;Sharmila Majumdar ,&nbsp;Thomas M. Link\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocarto.2025.100654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Machine learning (ML), increasingly used for predictive modeling, has seen rapid growth in osteoarthritis (OA) research over the past decade. This review highlights recent advances in ML model development across four OA outcome domains: clinical, structural (radiographic and MRI-based), and surgical endpoints, each addressing different but interrelated aspects of the disease.</div><div>For clinical outcomes, ML studies have focused on predicting changes in patient-reported clinical measures (e.g., pain and function). Radiographic OA has been characterized using deep learning (DL) models, and ML approaches have also been used to predict progression of Kellgren Lawrence grades and joint space narrowing. For MRI-based features, DL-based tools have been developed for automatic quantification of cartilage, bone marrow lesions, and subcutaneous fat; they have improved scalability and supported development of ML prediction models with cartilage loss outcomes. For total knee replacement outcomes, ML models have demonstrated strong performance, offering the potential for both early intervention and surgical planning.</div><div>This review also discusses emerging directions for ML in OA research, including the integration of multimodal data sources, the development of interpretable and explainable ML models, and the use of automated ML to streamline model development. Future approaches may include OA subtype-specific prediction models, alignment of ML approaches with clinical workflows, and enhanced external validation to ensure generalizability. These evolving strategies underscore the growing potential of ML to improve the detection of early OA, individualized risk stratification, and personalized interventions in OA clinical care.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000901\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and cartilage open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665913125000901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习(ML)越来越多地用于预测建模,在过去十年中,它在骨关节炎(OA)研究中得到了快速发展。这篇综述强调了在四个OA结果领域ML模型发展的最新进展:临床、结构(基于放射学和mri)和手术终点,每个终点都涉及疾病的不同但相互关联的方面。对于临床结果,ML研究的重点是预测患者报告的临床指标(如疼痛和功能)的变化。影像学骨性关节炎已使用深度学习(DL)模型进行表征,ML方法也被用于预测Kellgren Lawrence分级的进展和关节间隙变窄。对于基于mri的特征,基于dl的工具已被开发用于软骨、骨髓病变和皮下脂肪的自动量化;它们提高了可扩展性,并支持了软骨损失结果的ML预测模型的开发。对于全膝关节置换术的结果,ML模型已经显示出强大的性能,为早期干预和手术计划提供了潜力。本文还讨论了机器学习在OA研究中的新兴方向,包括多模态数据源的集成,可解释和可解释的机器学习模型的开发,以及使用自动化机器学习来简化模型开发。未来的方法可能包括OA亚型特异性预测模型,ML方法与临床工作流程的一致性,以及增强的外部验证以确保通用性。这些不断发展的策略强调了ML在改善早期OA的检测、个体化风险分层和个体化OA临床护理干预方面日益增长的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine learning models for clinical and structural knee osteoarthritis prediction: Recent advancements and future directions
Machine learning (ML), increasingly used for predictive modeling, has seen rapid growth in osteoarthritis (OA) research over the past decade. This review highlights recent advances in ML model development across four OA outcome domains: clinical, structural (radiographic and MRI-based), and surgical endpoints, each addressing different but interrelated aspects of the disease.
For clinical outcomes, ML studies have focused on predicting changes in patient-reported clinical measures (e.g., pain and function). Radiographic OA has been characterized using deep learning (DL) models, and ML approaches have also been used to predict progression of Kellgren Lawrence grades and joint space narrowing. For MRI-based features, DL-based tools have been developed for automatic quantification of cartilage, bone marrow lesions, and subcutaneous fat; they have improved scalability and supported development of ML prediction models with cartilage loss outcomes. For total knee replacement outcomes, ML models have demonstrated strong performance, offering the potential for both early intervention and surgical planning.
This review also discusses emerging directions for ML in OA research, including the integration of multimodal data sources, the development of interpretable and explainable ML models, and the use of automated ML to streamline model development. Future approaches may include OA subtype-specific prediction models, alignment of ML approaches with clinical workflows, and enhanced external validation to ensure generalizability. These evolving strategies underscore the growing potential of ML to improve the detection of early OA, individualized risk stratification, and personalized interventions in OA clinical care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信