依恋类型、不适应认知图式与关系满意度：恋爱关系的多层次分析

IF 2.6 2区心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Personality and Individual Differences Pub Date : 2025-08-04 DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113380

Karolina Ginalska, Agata Cichopek

{"title":"依恋类型、不适应认知图式与关系满意度：恋爱关系的多层次分析","authors":"Karolina Ginalska, Agata Cichopek","doi":"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the interplay between attachment styles, early maladaptive schemas (EMS), and relationship satisfaction within romantic relationships using a multilevel modeling approach. Drawing on attachment theory, the research examines how secure, avoidant, and ambivalent attachment styles influence the prevalence and intensity of EMS and their subsequent impact on romantic relationship satisfaction.</div><div>Participants included 80 heterosexual couples in relationships lasting at least two years. Measures included the Attachment Styles Questionnaire, the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-S3), and the Couples Satisfaction Index. Results revealed that secure attachment was associated with fewer EMS and higher relationship satisfaction, while avoidant and ambivalent styles corresponded with heightened EMS and diminished satisfaction. Ambivalent attachment was strongly linked to schemas such as abandonment, mistrust, and shame, while avoidant attachment was associated with emotional deprivation and pessimism. Additionally, relationship tenure moderated the impact of avoidant attachment on schemas like shame and approval-seeking.</div><div>These findings emphasize the lasting influence of early attachment experiences on adult romantic relationships and underscore the importance of addressing attachment-related maladaptive schemas in therapy. The study highlights the potential of interventions such as Schema Therapy to mitigate maladaptive cognitive patterns and enhance relationship satisfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48467,"journal":{"name":"Personality and Individual Differences","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 113380"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attachment styles, maladaptive cognitive schemas, and relationship satisfaction: A multilevel analysis of romantic relationships\",\"authors\":\"Karolina Ginalska, Agata Cichopek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.paid.2025.113380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the interplay between attachment styles, early maladaptive schemas (EMS), and relationship satisfaction within romantic relationships using a multilevel modeling approach. Drawing on attachment theory, the research examines how secure, avoidant, and ambivalent attachment styles influence the prevalence and intensity of EMS and their subsequent impact on romantic relationship satisfaction.</div><div>Participants included 80 heterosexual couples in relationships lasting at least two years. Measures included the Attachment Styles Questionnaire, the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-S3), and the Couples Satisfaction Index. Results revealed that secure attachment was associated with fewer EMS and higher relationship satisfaction, while avoidant and ambivalent styles corresponded with heightened EMS and diminished satisfaction. Ambivalent attachment was strongly linked to schemas such as abandonment, mistrust, and shame, while avoidant attachment was associated with emotional deprivation and pessimism. Additionally, relationship tenure moderated the impact of avoidant attachment on schemas like shame and approval-seeking.</div><div>These findings emphasize the lasting influence of early attachment experiences on adult romantic relationships and underscore the importance of addressing attachment-related maladaptive schemas in therapy. The study highlights the potential of interventions such as Schema Therapy to mitigate maladaptive cognitive patterns and enhance relationship satisfaction.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personality and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003423\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personality and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886925003423","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用多层次模型方法探讨恋爱关系中依恋类型、早期适应不良图式（EMS）和关系满意度之间的相互作用。根据依恋理论，本研究探讨了安全型、回避型和矛盾型依恋类型如何影响EMS的流行程度和强度，以及它们对恋爱关系满意度的后续影响。参与者包括80对关系持续至少两年的异性恋夫妇。测量方法包括依恋类型问卷、青年图式问卷（YSQ-S3）和夫妻满意度指数。结果表明，安全型依恋与较高的关系满意度相关，而回避型和矛盾型依恋与较高的关系满意度相关。矛盾依恋与抛弃、不信任和羞耻等图式密切相关，而回避依恋与情感剥夺和悲观主义有关。此外，关系任期调节了回避依恋对羞耻和寻求批准等图式的影响。这些发现强调了早期依恋经历对成人恋爱关系的持久影响，并强调了在治疗中处理与依恋相关的适应不良图式的重要性。该研究强调了图式疗法等干预措施在缓解适应不良认知模式和提高关系满意度方面的潜力。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Attachment styles, maladaptive cognitive schemas, and relationship satisfaction: A multilevel analysis of romantic relationships

This study explores the interplay between attachment styles, early maladaptive schemas (EMS), and relationship satisfaction within romantic relationships using a multilevel modeling approach. Drawing on attachment theory, the research examines how secure, avoidant, and ambivalent attachment styles influence the prevalence and intensity of EMS and their subsequent impact on romantic relationship satisfaction.

Participants included 80 heterosexual couples in relationships lasting at least two years. Measures included the Attachment Styles Questionnaire, the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ-S3), and the Couples Satisfaction Index. Results revealed that secure attachment was associated with fewer EMS and higher relationship satisfaction, while avoidant and ambivalent styles corresponded with heightened EMS and diminished satisfaction. Ambivalent attachment was strongly linked to schemas such as abandonment, mistrust, and shame, while avoidant attachment was associated with emotional deprivation and pessimism. Additionally, relationship tenure moderated the impact of avoidant attachment on schemas like shame and approval-seeking.

These findings emphasize the lasting influence of early attachment experiences on adult romantic relationships and underscore the importance of addressing attachment-related maladaptive schemas in therapy. The study highlights the potential of interventions such as Schema Therapy to mitigate maladaptive cognitive patterns and enhance relationship satisfaction.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Personality and Individual Differences PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

8.50

自引率

4.70%

发文量

577

审稿时长

41 days

期刊介绍： Personality and Individual Differences is devoted to the publication of articles (experimental, theoretical, review) which aim to integrate as far as possible the major factors of personality with empirical paradigms from experimental, physiological, animal, clinical, educational, criminological or industrial psychology or to seek an explanation for the causes and major determinants of individual differences in concepts derived from these disciplines. The editors are concerned with both genetic and environmental causes, and they are particularly interested in possible interaction effects.