基于渐进坍缩最小子结构模型和最小作用原理的手性边界对称变换方法

IF 6.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Bo Yang , Fan Wang , Yumei Zhang , Yuxu Guo , Shagea Alqawzai
{"title":"基于渐进坍缩最小子结构模型和最小作用原理的手性边界对称变换方法","authors":"Bo Yang ,&nbsp;Fan Wang ,&nbsp;Yumei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuxu Guo ,&nbsp;Shagea Alqawzai","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the analysis of structural progressive collapse, the asymmetry of the chiral boundary<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> in the minimum substructure prevented the simplification of the model. This study proposed a method for converting chiral boundaries based on the principles of virtual work and least action. Firstly, common patterns in the area of direct collapse effect (ADCE) under failure conditions of corner, perimeter, and internal columns were extracted based on the finite element results of NIST buildings. A minimal substructure model was constructed with boundary conditions as the primary differentiating factor. Based on the principles of virtual work and least action, a theoretical calculation method for converting chiral boundaries into equivalent symmetric boundaries was derived. Energy and deformation difference coefficients were introduced to control the conversion error. Reliability validation of the simplification method was performed based on finite element method from both 2D and 3D perspectives. Comparative results from the 2D model showed that the error in the collapse response between substructures with equivalent and chiral boundaries was below 10 %. The spatial surface boundaries of the equivalent stiffness were characterized based on the Fourier series expansion. Constructed a three-dimensional spatial function of equivalent stiffness and a nonlinear interaction relationship of three stiffness. The comparison results of the 3D model further confirmed that the load-displacement response and energy dissipation differences between the equivalent and chiral constraints were less than 5 %, and exhibited similar substructure failure modes, thereby validating the reliability of the method in complex three-dimensional scenarios. Further parametric analysis revealed that an increase in horizontal constraint stiffness could alter the deformation modes and failure paths of the substructure, highlighting the coupling behavior between horizontal constraint stiffness and the catenary effect. The innovation of this study lies in the proposed chiral-to-equivalent symmetric transformation theory based on the energy method, which breaks through the traditional minimal substructure model’s dependence on symmetric boundaries and simplifies the calculation process for nonlinear boundaries. The study systematically quantified the impact mechanism of boundary constraints on the structural resistance to collapse.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"343 ","pages":"Article 121027"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Symmetry transformation method for chiral boundary based on minimum substructure model of progressive collapse and least action principle\",\"authors\":\"Bo Yang ,&nbsp;Fan Wang ,&nbsp;Yumei Zhang ,&nbsp;Yuxu Guo ,&nbsp;Shagea Alqawzai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.121027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the analysis of structural progressive collapse, the asymmetry of the chiral boundary<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> in the minimum substructure prevented the simplification of the model. This study proposed a method for converting chiral boundaries based on the principles of virtual work and least action. Firstly, common patterns in the area of direct collapse effect (ADCE) under failure conditions of corner, perimeter, and internal columns were extracted based on the finite element results of NIST buildings. A minimal substructure model was constructed with boundary conditions as the primary differentiating factor. Based on the principles of virtual work and least action, a theoretical calculation method for converting chiral boundaries into equivalent symmetric boundaries was derived. Energy and deformation difference coefficients were introduced to control the conversion error. Reliability validation of the simplification method was performed based on finite element method from both 2D and 3D perspectives. Comparative results from the 2D model showed that the error in the collapse response between substructures with equivalent and chiral boundaries was below 10 %. The spatial surface boundaries of the equivalent stiffness were characterized based on the Fourier series expansion. Constructed a three-dimensional spatial function of equivalent stiffness and a nonlinear interaction relationship of three stiffness. The comparison results of the 3D model further confirmed that the load-displacement response and energy dissipation differences between the equivalent and chiral constraints were less than 5 %, and exhibited similar substructure failure modes, thereby validating the reliability of the method in complex three-dimensional scenarios. Further parametric analysis revealed that an increase in horizontal constraint stiffness could alter the deformation modes and failure paths of the substructure, highlighting the coupling behavior between horizontal constraint stiffness and the catenary effect. The innovation of this study lies in the proposed chiral-to-equivalent symmetric transformation theory based on the energy method, which breaks through the traditional minimal substructure model’s dependence on symmetric boundaries and simplifies the calculation process for nonlinear boundaries. The study systematically quantified the impact mechanism of boundary constraints on the structural resistance to collapse.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"volume\":\"343 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962501418X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102962501418X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在结构递进坍塌分析中,由于最小子结构中手性边界1的不对称性,导致模型难以简化。本文提出了一种基于虚功和最小作用原理的手性边界转换方法。首先,基于NIST建筑的有限元分析结果,提取了角、周、内柱破坏条件下直接倒塌效应区(ADCE)的常见模式;建立了以边界条件为主要判别因素的最小子结构模型。基于虚功和最小作用原理,推导了将手性边界转化为等效对称边界的理论计算方法。引入能量差系数和变形差系数控制转换误差。基于有限元法从二维和三维两个角度对简化方法进行了可靠性验证。与二维模型的对比结果表明,具有等效边界和手性边界的子结构之间的崩塌响应误差小于10 %。基于傅里叶级数展开对等效刚度的空间表面边界进行了表征。构造了等效刚度的三维空间函数和三种刚度的非线性相互作用关系。三维模型对比结果进一步证实,等效约束与手性约束的荷载-位移响应和能量耗散差异小于5 %,且子结构破坏模式相似,验证了该方法在复杂三维场景下的可靠性。进一步的参数分析表明,水平约束刚度的增加可以改变子结构的变形模式和破坏路径,突出了水平约束刚度与悬链线效应之间的耦合行为。本研究的创新之处在于提出了基于能量法的手性到等效对称变换理论,突破了传统最小子结构模型对对称边界的依赖,简化了非线性边界的计算过程。研究系统地量化了边界约束对结构抗倒塌能力的影响机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Symmetry transformation method for chiral boundary based on minimum substructure model of progressive collapse and least action principle
In the analysis of structural progressive collapse, the asymmetry of the chiral boundary1 in the minimum substructure prevented the simplification of the model. This study proposed a method for converting chiral boundaries based on the principles of virtual work and least action. Firstly, common patterns in the area of direct collapse effect (ADCE) under failure conditions of corner, perimeter, and internal columns were extracted based on the finite element results of NIST buildings. A minimal substructure model was constructed with boundary conditions as the primary differentiating factor. Based on the principles of virtual work and least action, a theoretical calculation method for converting chiral boundaries into equivalent symmetric boundaries was derived. Energy and deformation difference coefficients were introduced to control the conversion error. Reliability validation of the simplification method was performed based on finite element method from both 2D and 3D perspectives. Comparative results from the 2D model showed that the error in the collapse response between substructures with equivalent and chiral boundaries was below 10 %. The spatial surface boundaries of the equivalent stiffness were characterized based on the Fourier series expansion. Constructed a three-dimensional spatial function of equivalent stiffness and a nonlinear interaction relationship of three stiffness. The comparison results of the 3D model further confirmed that the load-displacement response and energy dissipation differences between the equivalent and chiral constraints were less than 5 %, and exhibited similar substructure failure modes, thereby validating the reliability of the method in complex three-dimensional scenarios. Further parametric analysis revealed that an increase in horizontal constraint stiffness could alter the deformation modes and failure paths of the substructure, highlighting the coupling behavior between horizontal constraint stiffness and the catenary effect. The innovation of this study lies in the proposed chiral-to-equivalent symmetric transformation theory based on the energy method, which breaks through the traditional minimal substructure model’s dependence on symmetric boundaries and simplifies the calculation process for nonlinear boundaries. The study systematically quantified the impact mechanism of boundary constraints on the structural resistance to collapse.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering Structures
Engineering Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
14.50%
发文量
1385
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed. The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering. Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels. Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信