Marislene Pulsena da Cunha Nunes, Letícia Martins Okada, Kássio Silva Cunha, Heitor Bernardes Pereira Delfino, Maria Fernanda Tourinho Peres, Catarina Machado Azeredo
{"title":"学校氛围与青少年欺凌发生的关系:SP-PROSO 2017","authors":"Marislene Pulsena da Cunha Nunes, Letícia Martins Okada, Kássio Silva Cunha, Heitor Bernardes Pereira Delfino, Maria Fernanda Tourinho Peres, Catarina Machado Azeredo","doi":"10.1177/08862605251355615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to analyze the association between school climate and victimization or perpetration by bullying in adolescents from public and private schools in the city of São Paulo. A cross-sectional study was performed using data from the São Paulo Project for the Social Development of Children and Adolescents, with a representative sample of Brazilian adolescents in the 9th grade of elementary school II ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1,939 students, 119 schools), in 2017. The school climate was assessed using 37 questions from which, using exploratory factor analysis, three factors were identified representing different dimensions that make up the school climate, subsequently divided into tertiles. We evaluated the prevalence of bullying. The association between the tertiles of each construct of school climate and types of bullying was analyzed by multiple logistic regression adjusted by covariates, with a 95% confidence interval and the linear <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> -trend value. The three climate constructs identified were named “positive climate,” “disorder climate” and “low legitimacy climate.” We found that the more positive the school climate in the perception of students, the lower the likelihood of perpetration ( <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>2nd tertile</jats:sub> = 0.46, 95% CI: [0.31, 0.70]; <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>3rd tercile</jats:sub> = 0.30; [0.25, 0.59], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> -trend < .01) and victimization by at least one type of bullying ( <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>2nd tertile</jats:sub> = 0.58, [0.41, 0.81]; <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>3rd tertile</jats:sub> = 0.52, [0.38, 0.70], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> -trend < .01). On the other hand, a school climate of disorder and low legitimacy were associated with a higher probability of bullying. Our results can support intervention strategies to improve the school climate to reduce school bullying and its negative consequences for adolescent health.","PeriodicalId":16289,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between School Climate and Occurrence of Bullying Among Adolescents: SP-PROSO 2017\",\"authors\":\"Marislene Pulsena da Cunha Nunes, Letícia Martins Okada, Kássio Silva Cunha, Heitor Bernardes Pereira Delfino, Maria Fernanda Tourinho Peres, Catarina Machado Azeredo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08862605251355615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study aimed to analyze the association between school climate and victimization or perpetration by bullying in adolescents from public and private schools in the city of São Paulo. A cross-sectional study was performed using data from the São Paulo Project for the Social Development of Children and Adolescents, with a representative sample of Brazilian adolescents in the 9th grade of elementary school II ( <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 1,939 students, 119 schools), in 2017. The school climate was assessed using 37 questions from which, using exploratory factor analysis, three factors were identified representing different dimensions that make up the school climate, subsequently divided into tertiles. We evaluated the prevalence of bullying. The association between the tertiles of each construct of school climate and types of bullying was analyzed by multiple logistic regression adjusted by covariates, with a 95% confidence interval and the linear <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> -trend value. The three climate constructs identified were named “positive climate,” “disorder climate” and “low legitimacy climate.” We found that the more positive the school climate in the perception of students, the lower the likelihood of perpetration ( <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>2nd tertile</jats:sub> = 0.46, 95% CI: [0.31, 0.70]; <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>3rd tercile</jats:sub> = 0.30; [0.25, 0.59], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> -trend < .01) and victimization by at least one type of bullying ( <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>2nd tertile</jats:sub> = 0.58, [0.41, 0.81]; <jats:italic>OR</jats:italic> <jats:sub>3rd tertile</jats:sub> = 0.52, [0.38, 0.70], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> -trend < .01). On the other hand, a school climate of disorder and low legitimacy were associated with a higher probability of bullying. Our results can support intervention strategies to improve the school climate to reduce school bullying and its negative consequences for adolescent health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Interpersonal Violence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251355615\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interpersonal Violence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605251355615","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association Between School Climate and Occurrence of Bullying Among Adolescents: SP-PROSO 2017
The study aimed to analyze the association between school climate and victimization or perpetration by bullying in adolescents from public and private schools in the city of São Paulo. A cross-sectional study was performed using data from the São Paulo Project for the Social Development of Children and Adolescents, with a representative sample of Brazilian adolescents in the 9th grade of elementary school II ( n = 1,939 students, 119 schools), in 2017. The school climate was assessed using 37 questions from which, using exploratory factor analysis, three factors were identified representing different dimensions that make up the school climate, subsequently divided into tertiles. We evaluated the prevalence of bullying. The association between the tertiles of each construct of school climate and types of bullying was analyzed by multiple logistic regression adjusted by covariates, with a 95% confidence interval and the linear p -trend value. The three climate constructs identified were named “positive climate,” “disorder climate” and “low legitimacy climate.” We found that the more positive the school climate in the perception of students, the lower the likelihood of perpetration ( OR2nd tertile = 0.46, 95% CI: [0.31, 0.70]; OR3rd tercile = 0.30; [0.25, 0.59], p -trend < .01) and victimization by at least one type of bullying ( OR2nd tertile = 0.58, [0.41, 0.81]; OR3rd tertile = 0.52, [0.38, 0.70], p -trend < .01). On the other hand, a school climate of disorder and low legitimacy were associated with a higher probability of bullying. Our results can support intervention strategies to improve the school climate to reduce school bullying and its negative consequences for adolescent health.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Interpersonal Violence is devoted to the study and treatment of victims and perpetrators of interpersonal violence. It provides a forum of discussion of the concerns and activities of professionals and researchers working in domestic violence, child sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, physical child abuse, and violent crime. With its dual focus on victims and victimizers, the journal will publish material that addresses the causes, effects, treatment, and prevention of all types of violence. JIV only publishes reports on individual studies in which the scientific method is applied to the study of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Research may use qualitative or quantitative methods. JIV does not publish reviews of research, individual case studies, or the conceptual analysis of some aspect of interpersonal violence. Outcome data for program or intervention evaluations must include a comparison or control group.