分析呼吸声和耳语声的声学方法:系统综述。

IF 1.1 3区 文学 Q3 ACOUSTICS
Phonetica Pub Date : 2025-08-04 Print Date: 2025-08-26 DOI:10.1515/phon-2025-0007
Chloe Patman, Paul Foulkes, Kirsty McDougall
{"title":"分析呼吸声和耳语声的声学方法:系统综述。","authors":"Chloe Patman, Paul Foulkes, Kirsty McDougall","doi":"10.1515/phon-2025-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Voice quality (VQ) is frequently analysed in phonetic and phonological research. Recently, there has been motivation to assess VQ more 'objectively' using acoustic analysis. Our systematic review revealed a notable research focus on pathological speakers, with 48 % of excluded studies being rejected for investigating pathological populations. Among studies involving non-pathological speakers, the analysed speech material is often restricted to sustained vowel productions. Therefore, the suitability of acoustic techniques when analysing more naturalistic speech and non-pathological speakers remains unclear. We present a systematic literature review of acoustic methods used to categorise breathy and whispery VQ in non-pathological speakers. The literature was surveyed using four databases (ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science) and ICPhS proceedings between 1999 and 2023. The selection criteria included peer-reviewed articles conducting an acoustic analysis of breathy and whispery voices for vocally healthy speakers. Initial searches yielded 754 papers. Once filtered, 21 papers remained. The results reveal some consistency in the main acoustic parameters for breathy VQ (higher spectral tilt and lower HNR/CPP). Whispery voice was only addressed in two studies, meaning no trends were observed. We conclude that there remain inconsistencies in methods and findings, and thus we cannot identify an agreed 'standard' approach generally applicable to non-pathological speakers.</p>","PeriodicalId":55608,"journal":{"name":"Phonetica","volume":" ","pages":"271-299"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acoustic methods for analysing breathy and whispery voices: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Chloe Patman, Paul Foulkes, Kirsty McDougall\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/phon-2025-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Voice quality (VQ) is frequently analysed in phonetic and phonological research. Recently, there has been motivation to assess VQ more 'objectively' using acoustic analysis. Our systematic review revealed a notable research focus on pathological speakers, with 48 % of excluded studies being rejected for investigating pathological populations. Among studies involving non-pathological speakers, the analysed speech material is often restricted to sustained vowel productions. Therefore, the suitability of acoustic techniques when analysing more naturalistic speech and non-pathological speakers remains unclear. We present a systematic literature review of acoustic methods used to categorise breathy and whispery VQ in non-pathological speakers. The literature was surveyed using four databases (ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science) and ICPhS proceedings between 1999 and 2023. The selection criteria included peer-reviewed articles conducting an acoustic analysis of breathy and whispery voices for vocally healthy speakers. Initial searches yielded 754 papers. Once filtered, 21 papers remained. The results reveal some consistency in the main acoustic parameters for breathy VQ (higher spectral tilt and lower HNR/CPP). Whispery voice was only addressed in two studies, meaning no trends were observed. We conclude that there remain inconsistencies in methods and findings, and thus we cannot identify an agreed 'standard' approach generally applicable to non-pathological speakers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phonetica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"271-299\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phonetica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2025-0007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phonetica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/phon-2025-0007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

语音质量是语音学和音系学研究中经常分析的问题。最近,有动机使用声学分析更“客观”地评估VQ。我们的系统综述显示了一个值得注意的研究重点是病理说话者,有48% %的被排除的研究被拒绝调查病理人群。在涉及非病理说话者的研究中,分析的言语材料通常仅限于持续元音的产生。因此,声学技术在分析更自然的言语和非病理说话者时的适用性仍然不清楚。我们提出了一个系统的文献综述声学方法用于分类呼吸和耳语VQ在非病理说话者。文献调查使用四个数据库(ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS和Web of Science)和1999年至2023年的ICPhS会议记录。选择标准包括同行评议的文章,这些文章对声音健康的说话者的呼吸声和耳语声进行了声学分析。最初的搜索产生了754篇论文。过滤后,剩下21张纸。结果表明,呼吸性VQ的主要声学参数具有一定的一致性(较高的频谱倾斜和较低的HNR/CPP)。只有两项研究涉及耳语,这意味着没有观察到趋势。我们的结论是,在方法和发现上仍然存在不一致的地方,因此我们不能确定一个普遍适用于非病理说话者的商定的“标准”方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acoustic methods for analysing breathy and whispery voices: a systematic review.

Voice quality (VQ) is frequently analysed in phonetic and phonological research. Recently, there has been motivation to assess VQ more 'objectively' using acoustic analysis. Our systematic review revealed a notable research focus on pathological speakers, with 48 % of excluded studies being rejected for investigating pathological populations. Among studies involving non-pathological speakers, the analysed speech material is often restricted to sustained vowel productions. Therefore, the suitability of acoustic techniques when analysing more naturalistic speech and non-pathological speakers remains unclear. We present a systematic literature review of acoustic methods used to categorise breathy and whispery VQ in non-pathological speakers. The literature was surveyed using four databases (ProQuest, PubMed, SCOPUS and Web of Science) and ICPhS proceedings between 1999 and 2023. The selection criteria included peer-reviewed articles conducting an acoustic analysis of breathy and whispery voices for vocally healthy speakers. Initial searches yielded 754 papers. Once filtered, 21 papers remained. The results reveal some consistency in the main acoustic parameters for breathy VQ (higher spectral tilt and lower HNR/CPP). Whispery voice was only addressed in two studies, meaning no trends were observed. We conclude that there remain inconsistencies in methods and findings, and thus we cannot identify an agreed 'standard' approach generally applicable to non-pathological speakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phonetica
Phonetica 物理-声学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary research into spoken language employs a wide range of approaches, from instrumental measures to perceptual and neurocognitive measures, to computational models, for investigating the properties and principles of speech in communicative settings across the world’s languages. ''Phonetica'' is an international interdisciplinary forum for phonetic science that covers all aspects of the subject matter, from phonetic and phonological descriptions of segments and prosodies to speech physiology, articulation, acoustics, perception, acquisition, and phonetic variation and change. ''Phonetica'' thus provides a platform for a comprehensive understanding of speaker-hearer interaction across languages and dialects, and of learning contexts throughout the lifespan. Papers published in this journal report expert original work that deals both with theoretical issues and with new empirical data, as well as with innovative methods and applications that will help to advance the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信