{"title":"住院患者fdg-pet / ct在内科的临床应用。","authors":"Shoshana Amos, Matan Fischer, Fadi Kharouf, Limor Rubin, Simona Ben-Haim, Marina Orevi, Dror Mevorach","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>FDG-PET/CT is useful in internal medicine for evaluation of patients with various inflammatory presentations. However, data regarding its diagnostic role in inpatients is limited. This study aims to assess the contribution of FDG-PET/CT in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Israel from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed FDG-PET/CT scans of 260 adult inpatients from Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Medical Intensive Care, and Intensive Cardiac Care units. Scans done solely for malignancy follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was a change in diagnosis and/or management, assessed by at least two physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 260 patients, indications included infection (42%), inflammation (35%), suspected malignancy (17%), cardiac disease (5%), and other (1%). 80% of studies were clinically helpful. In 40% treatment was changed, either in type (27%) or duration (13%). 9% of studies contributed to diagnosis alone, and 7% contributed to localization. 23% were negative studies, eliminating additional testing. 1% showed incidental findings requiring treatment. In 43% of studies, there were new findings that were not visible by prior morphologic imaging. A significantly higher percentage of clinically helpful studies was observed in patients with foreign devices compared with those without devices (89% versus 74%, P = 0.003), while immunocompromised patients had a lower percentage of clinically helpful studies (74% versus 84%, P = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG-PET/CT is a useful, noninvasive diagnostic tool in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine, Cardiology, and Intensive Care. This modality may aid in treatment and prevent unnecessary invasive procedures in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50807,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Use of Inpatient FDG-PET/CT in Internal Medicine.\",\"authors\":\"Shoshana Amos, Matan Fischer, Fadi Kharouf, Limor Rubin, Simona Ben-Haim, Marina Orevi, Dror Mevorach\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>FDG-PET/CT is useful in internal medicine for evaluation of patients with various inflammatory presentations. However, data regarding its diagnostic role in inpatients is limited. This study aims to assess the contribution of FDG-PET/CT in hospitalized patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Israel from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed FDG-PET/CT scans of 260 adult inpatients from Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Medical Intensive Care, and Intensive Cardiac Care units. Scans done solely for malignancy follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was a change in diagnosis and/or management, assessed by at least two physicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 260 patients, indications included infection (42%), inflammation (35%), suspected malignancy (17%), cardiac disease (5%), and other (1%). 80% of studies were clinically helpful. In 40% treatment was changed, either in type (27%) or duration (13%). 9% of studies contributed to diagnosis alone, and 7% contributed to localization. 23% were negative studies, eliminating additional testing. 1% showed incidental findings requiring treatment. In 43% of studies, there were new findings that were not visible by prior morphologic imaging. A significantly higher percentage of clinically helpful studies was observed in patients with foreign devices compared with those without devices (89% versus 74%, P = 0.003), while immunocompromised patients had a lower percentage of clinically helpful studies (74% versus 84%, P = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDG-PET/CT is a useful, noninvasive diagnostic tool in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine, Cardiology, and Intensive Care. This modality may aid in treatment and prevent unnecessary invasive procedures in selected patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.028\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2025.07.028","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Use of Inpatient FDG-PET/CT in Internal Medicine.
Objective: FDG-PET/CT is useful in internal medicine for evaluation of patients with various inflammatory presentations. However, data regarding its diagnostic role in inpatients is limited. This study aims to assess the contribution of FDG-PET/CT in hospitalized patients.
Methods: An observational cohort study was conducted at a tertiary medical center in Israel from 2015 to 2020. We analyzed FDG-PET/CT scans of 260 adult inpatients from Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Medical Intensive Care, and Intensive Cardiac Care units. Scans done solely for malignancy follow-up were excluded. The primary outcome was a change in diagnosis and/or management, assessed by at least two physicians.
Results: Among the 260 patients, indications included infection (42%), inflammation (35%), suspected malignancy (17%), cardiac disease (5%), and other (1%). 80% of studies were clinically helpful. In 40% treatment was changed, either in type (27%) or duration (13%). 9% of studies contributed to diagnosis alone, and 7% contributed to localization. 23% were negative studies, eliminating additional testing. 1% showed incidental findings requiring treatment. In 43% of studies, there were new findings that were not visible by prior morphologic imaging. A significantly higher percentage of clinically helpful studies was observed in patients with foreign devices compared with those without devices (89% versus 74%, P = 0.003), while immunocompromised patients had a lower percentage of clinically helpful studies (74% versus 84%, P = 0.06).
Conclusion: FDG-PET/CT is a useful, noninvasive diagnostic tool in patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine, Cardiology, and Intensive Care. This modality may aid in treatment and prevent unnecessary invasive procedures in selected patients.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Medicine - "The Green Journal" - publishes original clinical research of interest to physicians in internal medicine, both in academia and community-based practice. AJM is the official journal of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine, a prestigious group comprising internal medicine department chairs at more than 125 medical schools across the U.S. Each issue carries useful reviews as well as seminal articles of immediate interest to the practicing physician, including peer-reviewed, original scientific studies that have direct clinical significance and position papers on health care issues, medical education, and public policy.