前庭护理的临床路径:前庭康复与客观前庭测试之间的转诊趋势。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
American Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-09-02 Epub Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00037
Evalena Behr, Mikayla L Massa, Julie A Honaker
{"title":"前庭护理的临床路径:前庭康复与客观前庭测试之间的转诊趋势。","authors":"Evalena Behr, Mikayla L Massa, Julie A Honaker","doi":"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with vestibular-related dysfunction are commonly referred to a physical therapist for vestibular rehabilitation (VR) or possibly to an audiologist for objective vestibular test battery (VTB). As a conservative first step, patients are often referred to VR for evaluation and management and from there patients may be referred for VTB when patients are not meeting therapy goals or VR evaluation is unclear of the diagnosis. This research aimed to investigate the referral patterns from VR to VTB and VTB to VR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective chart review was completed at a large Midwestern tertiary hospital. This study included 149 patients aged 18 years and older with history of dizziness, vertigo, or imbalance concerns who received VR and VTB. Patients were divided into two groups: (a) VR-first group and (b) VTB-first group. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the total number of VR sessions for total cohort and common vestibular diagnoses and determine differences in sessions between VR-first and VTB-first groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences in number of VR sessions were observed between the VR-first and VTB-first groups, with less sessions overall in the VTB- first group (<i>p</i> < .05), except for the BPPV group (<i>p</i> = .12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early and accurate objective vestibular testing can significantly impact the treatment trajectory for patients with unilateral, bilateral, and central vestibular findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49241,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"687-694"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Pathways in Vestibular Care: Referral Trends Between Vestibular Rehabilitation and Objective Vestibular Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Evalena Behr, Mikayla L Massa, Julie A Honaker\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with vestibular-related dysfunction are commonly referred to a physical therapist for vestibular rehabilitation (VR) or possibly to an audiologist for objective vestibular test battery (VTB). As a conservative first step, patients are often referred to VR for evaluation and management and from there patients may be referred for VTB when patients are not meeting therapy goals or VR evaluation is unclear of the diagnosis. This research aimed to investigate the referral patterns from VR to VTB and VTB to VR.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective chart review was completed at a large Midwestern tertiary hospital. This study included 149 patients aged 18 years and older with history of dizziness, vertigo, or imbalance concerns who received VR and VTB. Patients were divided into two groups: (a) VR-first group and (b) VTB-first group. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the total number of VR sessions for total cohort and common vestibular diagnoses and determine differences in sessions between VR-first and VTB-first groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant differences in number of VR sessions were observed between the VR-first and VTB-first groups, with less sessions overall in the VTB- first group (<i>p</i> < .05), except for the BPPV group (<i>p</i> = .12).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early and accurate objective vestibular testing can significantly impact the treatment trajectory for patients with unilateral, bilateral, and central vestibular findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"687-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00037\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_AJA-25-00037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患有前庭相关功能障碍的患者通常会被推荐给物理治疗师进行前庭康复(VR)或可能到听力学家进行客观前庭测试(VTB)。作为保守的第一步,患者通常被转介到VR进行评估和管理,当患者未达到治疗目标或VR评估诊断不明确时,患者可能会被转介到VTB。本研究旨在探讨从虚拟现实到VTB和VTB到虚拟现实的转介模式。方法:对中西部某大型三级医院的病历进行回顾性分析。这项研究包括149名18岁及以上的患者,他们有头晕、眩晕或失衡的病史,接受了VR和VTB。患者分为两组:(a) VR-first组和(b) VTB-first组。描述性统计用于量化总队列和常见前庭诊断的VR会话总数,并确定VR优先组和vtb优先组之间会话的差异。结果:VR-first组和VTB-first组之间的VR会话数有统计学意义差异,VTB-first组总体会话数较少(p < 0.05), BPPV组除外(p = 0.12)。结论:早期、准确、客观的前庭检查对单侧、双侧和中枢性前庭病变患者的治疗轨迹有重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Pathways in Vestibular Care: Referral Trends Between Vestibular Rehabilitation and Objective Vestibular Testing.

Purpose: Patients with vestibular-related dysfunction are commonly referred to a physical therapist for vestibular rehabilitation (VR) or possibly to an audiologist for objective vestibular test battery (VTB). As a conservative first step, patients are often referred to VR for evaluation and management and from there patients may be referred for VTB when patients are not meeting therapy goals or VR evaluation is unclear of the diagnosis. This research aimed to investigate the referral patterns from VR to VTB and VTB to VR.

Method: Retrospective chart review was completed at a large Midwestern tertiary hospital. This study included 149 patients aged 18 years and older with history of dizziness, vertigo, or imbalance concerns who received VR and VTB. Patients were divided into two groups: (a) VR-first group and (b) VTB-first group. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify the total number of VR sessions for total cohort and common vestibular diagnoses and determine differences in sessions between VR-first and VTB-first groups.

Results: Statistically significant differences in number of VR sessions were observed between the VR-first and VTB-first groups, with less sessions overall in the VTB- first group (p < .05), except for the BPPV group (p = .12).

Conclusion: Early and accurate objective vestibular testing can significantly impact the treatment trajectory for patients with unilateral, bilateral, and central vestibular findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Audiology
American Journal of Audiology AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Mission: AJA publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles pertaining to clinical audiology methods and issues, and serves as an outlet for discussion of related professional and educational issues and ideas. The journal is an international outlet for research on clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, management and outcomes of hearing and balance disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. The clinical orientation of the journal allows for the publication of reports on audiology as implemented nationally and internationally, including novel clinical procedures, approaches, and cases. AJA seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work. Scope: The broad field of clinical audiology, including audiologic/aural rehabilitation; balance and balance disorders; cultural and linguistic diversity; detection, diagnosis, prevention, habilitation, rehabilitation, and monitoring of hearing loss; hearing aids, cochlear implants, and hearing-assistive technology; hearing disorders; lifespan perspectives on auditory function; speech perception; and tinnitus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信