在冲突后地区采用纵向研究设计:从实地获得的战略和经验教训。

IF 0.8 4区 社会学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Asia Mohamed Mohamud, Jennifer Sdunzik, Wilella D Burgess, Abdirisak Dalmar, Mohamed Jimale
{"title":"在冲突后地区采用纵向研究设计:从实地获得的战略和经验教训。","authors":"Asia Mohamed Mohamud, Jennifer Sdunzik, Wilella D Burgess, Abdirisak Dalmar, Mohamed Jimale","doi":"10.1332/17579597Y2025D000000055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Longitudinal methodology is a powerful study design that focuses on processes and patterns of change; yet it is rarely deployed in research to understand post-conflict circumstances. This article describes experiences and lessons learned from a longitudinal study of an education intervention programme in a post-conflict setting. It illustrates both challenges and successful mitigation strategies for conducting a longitudinal study in a fragile and demanding research environment. Our study identified both methodological (participant recruitment, attrition, contextual variability, instrument modifications and record-keeping) and contextual (community, environmental, security and civil perturbations) challenges that impact longitudinal studies in post-conflict societies. By describing the challenges and successful strategies employed in this longitudinal research study, the article illustrates how researchers and practitioners can utilise this methodology to capture individual change over time, identify impacts and outcomes, and gain a deeper understanding of social phenomena and individual development in post-conflict societies.</p>","PeriodicalId":45988,"journal":{"name":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Employing a longitudinal study design in a post-conflict zone: strategies and lessons learned from the field.\",\"authors\":\"Asia Mohamed Mohamud, Jennifer Sdunzik, Wilella D Burgess, Abdirisak Dalmar, Mohamed Jimale\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/17579597Y2025D000000055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Longitudinal methodology is a powerful study design that focuses on processes and patterns of change; yet it is rarely deployed in research to understand post-conflict circumstances. This article describes experiences and lessons learned from a longitudinal study of an education intervention programme in a post-conflict setting. It illustrates both challenges and successful mitigation strategies for conducting a longitudinal study in a fragile and demanding research environment. Our study identified both methodological (participant recruitment, attrition, contextual variability, instrument modifications and record-keeping) and contextual (community, environmental, security and civil perturbations) challenges that impact longitudinal studies in post-conflict societies. By describing the challenges and successful strategies employed in this longitudinal research study, the article illustrates how researchers and practitioners can utilise this methodology to capture individual change over time, identify impacts and outcomes, and gain a deeper understanding of social phenomena and individual development in post-conflict societies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/17579597Y2025D000000055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Longitudinal and Life Course Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/17579597Y2025D000000055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纵向方法是一种强大的研究设计,专注于变化的过程和模式;然而,它很少被用于了解冲突后环境的研究。本文描述了从冲突后环境中的教育干预计划的纵向研究中获得的经验和教训。它说明了在脆弱和苛刻的研究环境中进行纵向研究的挑战和成功的缓解战略。我们的研究确定了影响冲突后社会纵向研究的方法学挑战(参与者招募、人员流失、环境变异性、仪器修改和记录保存)和环境挑战(社区、环境、安全和民间扰动)。通过描述纵向研究中所面临的挑战和成功的策略,本文说明了研究人员和实践者如何利用这种方法来捕捉个体随时间的变化,确定影响和结果,并对冲突后社会的社会现象和个体发展有更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Employing a longitudinal study design in a post-conflict zone: strategies and lessons learned from the field.

Longitudinal methodology is a powerful study design that focuses on processes and patterns of change; yet it is rarely deployed in research to understand post-conflict circumstances. This article describes experiences and lessons learned from a longitudinal study of an education intervention programme in a post-conflict setting. It illustrates both challenges and successful mitigation strategies for conducting a longitudinal study in a fragile and demanding research environment. Our study identified both methodological (participant recruitment, attrition, contextual variability, instrument modifications and record-keeping) and contextual (community, environmental, security and civil perturbations) challenges that impact longitudinal studies in post-conflict societies. By describing the challenges and successful strategies employed in this longitudinal research study, the article illustrates how researchers and practitioners can utilise this methodology to capture individual change over time, identify impacts and outcomes, and gain a deeper understanding of social phenomena and individual development in post-conflict societies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信