早产儿极低出生体重儿喂养不耐受的相关因素和临床结局。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Stav Soffer, Dror Mandel, Jacky Herzlich, Rafael Mendelsohn, Ronit Lubetzky, Hadar Moran-Lev
{"title":"早产儿极低出生体重儿喂养不耐受的相关因素和临床结局。","authors":"Stav Soffer, Dror Mandel, Jacky Herzlich, Rafael Mendelsohn, Ronit Lubetzky, Hadar Moran-Lev","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-14386-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Feeding intolerance (FI) is a major challenge among extremely low birthweight (ELBW) preterm infants, impacting their growth, development, and overall clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify factors associated with FI in ELBW preterm infants and examine the relationship between FI and respiratory support modalities. Our retrospective review of medical records of all ELBW preterm infants between 12/2016 and 12/2021 revealed that 78 (58%) of the 133 ELBW infants (median gestational age 26.5 weeks, median birth weight 809 g) had FI. FI was more common in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and periventricular leukomalacia (n = 69 vs. n = 24 and n = 11 vs. n = 2, respectively, p < 0.001). Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) had the highest FI rate (7.8 per 100 device-days) compared with other noninvasive ventilation modes (p < 0.001). Infants with FI required longer to achieve full enteral feeding (median 18 vs. 14 days for infants without FI, p < 0.001) and had longer neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stays (median 89.5 vs. 47 days, respectively, p < 0.001). We conclude that provision of NIPPV support was associated with higher FI rates and longer NICU stays in preterm ELBW infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"28189"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317120/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associated factors and clinical outcomes of feeding intolerance in preterm extremely low birthweight infants.\",\"authors\":\"Stav Soffer, Dror Mandel, Jacky Herzlich, Rafael Mendelsohn, Ronit Lubetzky, Hadar Moran-Lev\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-14386-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Feeding intolerance (FI) is a major challenge among extremely low birthweight (ELBW) preterm infants, impacting their growth, development, and overall clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify factors associated with FI in ELBW preterm infants and examine the relationship between FI and respiratory support modalities. Our retrospective review of medical records of all ELBW preterm infants between 12/2016 and 12/2021 revealed that 78 (58%) of the 133 ELBW infants (median gestational age 26.5 weeks, median birth weight 809 g) had FI. FI was more common in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and periventricular leukomalacia (n = 69 vs. n = 24 and n = 11 vs. n = 2, respectively, p < 0.001). Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) had the highest FI rate (7.8 per 100 device-days) compared with other noninvasive ventilation modes (p < 0.001). Infants with FI required longer to achieve full enteral feeding (median 18 vs. 14 days for infants without FI, p < 0.001) and had longer neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stays (median 89.5 vs. 47 days, respectively, p < 0.001). We conclude that provision of NIPPV support was associated with higher FI rates and longer NICU stays in preterm ELBW infants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"28189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317120/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14386-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14386-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

喂养不耐受(FI)是极低出生体重(ELBW)早产儿面临的主要挑战,影响其生长发育和整体临床结果。我们的目的是确定与ELBW早产儿FI相关的因素,并检查FI与呼吸支持方式之间的关系。我们回顾性回顾了2016年12月至2021年12月期间所有ELBW早产儿的医疗记录,发现133例ELBW婴儿(中位胎龄26.5周,中位出生体重809 g)中有78例(58%)患有FI。FI在支气管肺发育不良和脑室周围白质软化的婴儿中更为常见(n = 69 vs. n = 24, n = 11 vs. n = 2)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Associated factors and clinical outcomes of feeding intolerance in preterm extremely low birthweight infants.

Associated factors and clinical outcomes of feeding intolerance in preterm extremely low birthweight infants.

Feeding intolerance (FI) is a major challenge among extremely low birthweight (ELBW) preterm infants, impacting their growth, development, and overall clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify factors associated with FI in ELBW preterm infants and examine the relationship between FI and respiratory support modalities. Our retrospective review of medical records of all ELBW preterm infants between 12/2016 and 12/2021 revealed that 78 (58%) of the 133 ELBW infants (median gestational age 26.5 weeks, median birth weight 809 g) had FI. FI was more common in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and periventricular leukomalacia (n = 69 vs. n = 24 and n = 11 vs. n = 2, respectively, p < 0.001). Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) had the highest FI rate (7.8 per 100 device-days) compared with other noninvasive ventilation modes (p < 0.001). Infants with FI required longer to achieve full enteral feeding (median 18 vs. 14 days for infants without FI, p < 0.001) and had longer neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stays (median 89.5 vs. 47 days, respectively, p < 0.001). We conclude that provision of NIPPV support was associated with higher FI rates and longer NICU stays in preterm ELBW infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信