{"title":"瞳孔波动表明有意遗忘自然场景。","authors":"Huiyu Ding, Jonathon Whitlock, Lili Sahakyan","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have revealed that information can be intentionally forgotten when instructed, commonly studied in the laboratory with the directed forgetting (DF) procedure. The current investigation examined pupillometric signals associated with intentional forgetting, as the pupil reflects the activity in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system that is functionally involved in the neural correlates of intentional forgetting. Experiment 1 employed an item-method DF paradigm, where participants were presented with natural scenes, each followed by a memory cue to either remember (R) or forget (F) that scene. At test, participants were asked to judge whether the presented scene was the original studied version (i.e., \"Old\") or a mirrored variant (i.e., \"Lure\"). By comparing pupil dilation during test trials between R-cued and F-cued scenes for both hit and miss trials, we found greater pupil dilation for F-cued miss trials compared to R-cued miss trials, but no difference in pupil dilation between the cue conditions for hit trials. This suggests a unique pupillometric pattern linked to successful intentional forgetting. Experiment 2 was aimed at assessing if memory strength differences could provide an explanation for the observed effect. Instead of DF cues, we manipulated memory strength by repeating a subset of scenes, thereby converting all study items into R-cued items with different degrees of familiarity. We observed no difference in pupil dilation between strongly encoded and weakly encoded scenes at test, indicating that encoding strength by itself did not explain the difference in pupil dilation resulting from intentional forgetting. Together, these findings provide novel evidence that pupil fluctuations during retrieval index successful intentional forgetting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 8","pages":"e70119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.\",\"authors\":\"Huiyu Ding, Jonathon Whitlock, Lili Sahakyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies have revealed that information can be intentionally forgotten when instructed, commonly studied in the laboratory with the directed forgetting (DF) procedure. The current investigation examined pupillometric signals associated with intentional forgetting, as the pupil reflects the activity in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system that is functionally involved in the neural correlates of intentional forgetting. Experiment 1 employed an item-method DF paradigm, where participants were presented with natural scenes, each followed by a memory cue to either remember (R) or forget (F) that scene. At test, participants were asked to judge whether the presented scene was the original studied version (i.e., \\\"Old\\\") or a mirrored variant (i.e., \\\"Lure\\\"). By comparing pupil dilation during test trials between R-cued and F-cued scenes for both hit and miss trials, we found greater pupil dilation for F-cued miss trials compared to R-cued miss trials, but no difference in pupil dilation between the cue conditions for hit trials. This suggests a unique pupillometric pattern linked to successful intentional forgetting. Experiment 2 was aimed at assessing if memory strength differences could provide an explanation for the observed effect. Instead of DF cues, we manipulated memory strength by repeating a subset of scenes, thereby converting all study items into R-cued items with different degrees of familiarity. We observed no difference in pupil dilation between strongly encoded and weakly encoded scenes at test, indicating that encoding strength by itself did not explain the difference in pupil dilation resulting from intentional forgetting. Together, these findings provide novel evidence that pupil fluctuations during retrieval index successful intentional forgetting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 8\",\"pages\":\"e70119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.
Studies have revealed that information can be intentionally forgotten when instructed, commonly studied in the laboratory with the directed forgetting (DF) procedure. The current investigation examined pupillometric signals associated with intentional forgetting, as the pupil reflects the activity in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system that is functionally involved in the neural correlates of intentional forgetting. Experiment 1 employed an item-method DF paradigm, where participants were presented with natural scenes, each followed by a memory cue to either remember (R) or forget (F) that scene. At test, participants were asked to judge whether the presented scene was the original studied version (i.e., "Old") or a mirrored variant (i.e., "Lure"). By comparing pupil dilation during test trials between R-cued and F-cued scenes for both hit and miss trials, we found greater pupil dilation for F-cued miss trials compared to R-cued miss trials, but no difference in pupil dilation between the cue conditions for hit trials. This suggests a unique pupillometric pattern linked to successful intentional forgetting. Experiment 2 was aimed at assessing if memory strength differences could provide an explanation for the observed effect. Instead of DF cues, we manipulated memory strength by repeating a subset of scenes, thereby converting all study items into R-cued items with different degrees of familiarity. We observed no difference in pupil dilation between strongly encoded and weakly encoded scenes at test, indicating that encoding strength by itself did not explain the difference in pupil dilation resulting from intentional forgetting. Together, these findings provide novel evidence that pupil fluctuations during retrieval index successful intentional forgetting.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.