瞳孔波动表明有意遗忘自然场景。

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Huiyu Ding, Jonathon Whitlock, Lili Sahakyan
{"title":"瞳孔波动表明有意遗忘自然场景。","authors":"Huiyu Ding, Jonathon Whitlock, Lili Sahakyan","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have revealed that information can be intentionally forgotten when instructed, commonly studied in the laboratory with the directed forgetting (DF) procedure. The current investigation examined pupillometric signals associated with intentional forgetting, as the pupil reflects the activity in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system that is functionally involved in the neural correlates of intentional forgetting. Experiment 1 employed an item-method DF paradigm, where participants were presented with natural scenes, each followed by a memory cue to either remember (R) or forget (F) that scene. At test, participants were asked to judge whether the presented scene was the original studied version (i.e., \"Old\") or a mirrored variant (i.e., \"Lure\"). By comparing pupil dilation during test trials between R-cued and F-cued scenes for both hit and miss trials, we found greater pupil dilation for F-cued miss trials compared to R-cued miss trials, but no difference in pupil dilation between the cue conditions for hit trials. This suggests a unique pupillometric pattern linked to successful intentional forgetting. Experiment 2 was aimed at assessing if memory strength differences could provide an explanation for the observed effect. Instead of DF cues, we manipulated memory strength by repeating a subset of scenes, thereby converting all study items into R-cued items with different degrees of familiarity. We observed no difference in pupil dilation between strongly encoded and weakly encoded scenes at test, indicating that encoding strength by itself did not explain the difference in pupil dilation resulting from intentional forgetting. Together, these findings provide novel evidence that pupil fluctuations during retrieval index successful intentional forgetting.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 8","pages":"e70119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.\",\"authors\":\"Huiyu Ding, Jonathon Whitlock, Lili Sahakyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Studies have revealed that information can be intentionally forgotten when instructed, commonly studied in the laboratory with the directed forgetting (DF) procedure. The current investigation examined pupillometric signals associated with intentional forgetting, as the pupil reflects the activity in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system that is functionally involved in the neural correlates of intentional forgetting. Experiment 1 employed an item-method DF paradigm, where participants were presented with natural scenes, each followed by a memory cue to either remember (R) or forget (F) that scene. At test, participants were asked to judge whether the presented scene was the original studied version (i.e., \\\"Old\\\") or a mirrored variant (i.e., \\\"Lure\\\"). By comparing pupil dilation during test trials between R-cued and F-cued scenes for both hit and miss trials, we found greater pupil dilation for F-cued miss trials compared to R-cued miss trials, but no difference in pupil dilation between the cue conditions for hit trials. This suggests a unique pupillometric pattern linked to successful intentional forgetting. Experiment 2 was aimed at assessing if memory strength differences could provide an explanation for the observed effect. Instead of DF cues, we manipulated memory strength by repeating a subset of scenes, thereby converting all study items into R-cued items with different degrees of familiarity. We observed no difference in pupil dilation between strongly encoded and weakly encoded scenes at test, indicating that encoding strength by itself did not explain the difference in pupil dilation resulting from intentional forgetting. Together, these findings provide novel evidence that pupil fluctuations during retrieval index successful intentional forgetting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 8\",\"pages\":\"e70119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12317212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70119\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70119","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,信息可以在被指示的情况下被有意遗忘,通常在实验室用定向遗忘(DF)程序进行研究。目前的研究检查了与有意遗忘相关的瞳孔测量信号,因为瞳孔反映了蓝斑-去甲肾上腺素(LC-NE)系统的活动,该系统在功能上参与有意遗忘的神经相关。实验1采用了项目法的DF范式,参与者被呈现自然场景,每个场景都有一个记忆提示,让他们记住(R)或忘记(F)那个场景。在测试中,参与者被要求判断所呈现的场景是原始研究版本(即“旧”)还是镜像版本(即“诱饵”)。通过比较在r -线索和f -线索的场景下的瞳孔扩张,我们发现f -线索的瞳孔扩张比r -线索的瞳孔扩张更大,但在击中试验的线索条件下瞳孔扩张没有差异。这表明一种独特的瞳孔测量模式与成功的有意遗忘有关。实验2旨在评估记忆强度差异是否可以解释观察到的效应。代替DF提示,我们通过重复场景子集来操纵记忆强度,从而将所有研究项目转换为熟悉程度不同的r提示项目。我们观察到强编码和弱编码场景的瞳孔扩张没有差异,这表明编码强度本身并不能解释故意遗忘导致的瞳孔扩张差异。总之,这些发现提供了新的证据,瞳孔波动在检索指数成功有意遗忘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.

Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.

Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.

Pupil Fluctuations Signal Intentional Forgetting of Natural Scenes.

Studies have revealed that information can be intentionally forgotten when instructed, commonly studied in the laboratory with the directed forgetting (DF) procedure. The current investigation examined pupillometric signals associated with intentional forgetting, as the pupil reflects the activity in the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine (LC-NE) system that is functionally involved in the neural correlates of intentional forgetting. Experiment 1 employed an item-method DF paradigm, where participants were presented with natural scenes, each followed by a memory cue to either remember (R) or forget (F) that scene. At test, participants were asked to judge whether the presented scene was the original studied version (i.e., "Old") or a mirrored variant (i.e., "Lure"). By comparing pupil dilation during test trials between R-cued and F-cued scenes for both hit and miss trials, we found greater pupil dilation for F-cued miss trials compared to R-cued miss trials, but no difference in pupil dilation between the cue conditions for hit trials. This suggests a unique pupillometric pattern linked to successful intentional forgetting. Experiment 2 was aimed at assessing if memory strength differences could provide an explanation for the observed effect. Instead of DF cues, we manipulated memory strength by repeating a subset of scenes, thereby converting all study items into R-cued items with different degrees of familiarity. We observed no difference in pupil dilation between strongly encoded and weakly encoded scenes at test, indicating that encoding strength by itself did not explain the difference in pupil dilation resulting from intentional forgetting. Together, these findings provide novel evidence that pupil fluctuations during retrieval index successful intentional forgetting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信