Ramy Samargandi, Rawad H Alsayed, Mazen A Alqarni, Sohail S Alghamdi, Adel Alzahrani, Anas Almutairi, Safinaz M Alshiakh, Abdullah S Algarni
{"title":"隐性影响:医学生对利益冲突的认识与态度——在沙特阿拉伯吉达的横断面研究","authors":"Ramy Samargandi, Rawad H Alsayed, Mazen A Alqarni, Sohail S Alghamdi, Adel Alzahrani, Anas Almutairi, Safinaz M Alshiakh, Abdullah S Algarni","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0328884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conflicts of interest (COI) pose ethical challenges in medical education and clinical practice, potentially influencing decision-making. While COI policies and education vary globally, inconsistent training leaves medical students vulnerable to industry influence. In Saudi Arabia, COI education remains underexplored. This study assesses medical students' knowledge, attitudes, and exposure to COI, aiming to identify gaps and inform educational improvements.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 392 medical students from multiple universities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A validated questionnaire was administered to assess COI knowledge, attitudes, and exposure to industry interactions. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 392 participants were included. Overall, 71.4% of students were able to define COI, while 28.6% lacked awareness. Clinical students had significantly higher knowledge scores than preclinical students (p = 0.001). Grade Point Average (GPA) was significantly associated with attitudes toward COI, with students who had excellent GPAs scoring the highest (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in knowledge or attitude scores based on gender, research experience, and university affiliation. Over half of the students (52.6%) felt inadequately educated about COI, and 48.5% had never attended a COI lecture. Clinical students (65.2%) reported more interactions with pharmaceutical representatives than preclinical students (34.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While medical students generally recognize COI, gaps in knowledge and formal education persist. Clinical exposure appears to enhance knowledge, yet inconsistent education leaves students vulnerable to industry influence. Strengthening COI education within medical curricula is essential to promote ethical decision-making and uphold professional integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 8","pages":"e0328884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The hidden influence: Medical students' knowledge and attitude of conflict of interest-A cross-sectional study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.\",\"authors\":\"Ramy Samargandi, Rawad H Alsayed, Mazen A Alqarni, Sohail S Alghamdi, Adel Alzahrani, Anas Almutairi, Safinaz M Alshiakh, Abdullah S Algarni\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pone.0328884\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Conflicts of interest (COI) pose ethical challenges in medical education and clinical practice, potentially influencing decision-making. While COI policies and education vary globally, inconsistent training leaves medical students vulnerable to industry influence. In Saudi Arabia, COI education remains underexplored. This study assesses medical students' knowledge, attitudes, and exposure to COI, aiming to identify gaps and inform educational improvements.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 392 medical students from multiple universities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A validated questionnaire was administered to assess COI knowledge, attitudes, and exposure to industry interactions. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 392 participants were included. Overall, 71.4% of students were able to define COI, while 28.6% lacked awareness. Clinical students had significantly higher knowledge scores than preclinical students (p = 0.001). Grade Point Average (GPA) was significantly associated with attitudes toward COI, with students who had excellent GPAs scoring the highest (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in knowledge or attitude scores based on gender, research experience, and university affiliation. Over half of the students (52.6%) felt inadequately educated about COI, and 48.5% had never attended a COI lecture. Clinical students (65.2%) reported more interactions with pharmaceutical representatives than preclinical students (34.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While medical students generally recognize COI, gaps in knowledge and formal education persist. Clinical exposure appears to enhance knowledge, yet inconsistent education leaves students vulnerable to industry influence. Strengthening COI education within medical curricula is essential to promote ethical decision-making and uphold professional integrity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"e0328884\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12316206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS ONE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328884\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328884","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The hidden influence: Medical students' knowledge and attitude of conflict of interest-A cross-sectional study in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Introduction: Conflicts of interest (COI) pose ethical challenges in medical education and clinical practice, potentially influencing decision-making. While COI policies and education vary globally, inconsistent training leaves medical students vulnerable to industry influence. In Saudi Arabia, COI education remains underexplored. This study assesses medical students' knowledge, attitudes, and exposure to COI, aiming to identify gaps and inform educational improvements.
Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 392 medical students from multiple universities in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. A validated questionnaire was administered to assess COI knowledge, attitudes, and exposure to industry interactions. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 29.0, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
Results: A total of 392 participants were included. Overall, 71.4% of students were able to define COI, while 28.6% lacked awareness. Clinical students had significantly higher knowledge scores than preclinical students (p = 0.001). Grade Point Average (GPA) was significantly associated with attitudes toward COI, with students who had excellent GPAs scoring the highest (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in knowledge or attitude scores based on gender, research experience, and university affiliation. Over half of the students (52.6%) felt inadequately educated about COI, and 48.5% had never attended a COI lecture. Clinical students (65.2%) reported more interactions with pharmaceutical representatives than preclinical students (34.8%).
Conclusion: While medical students generally recognize COI, gaps in knowledge and formal education persist. Clinical exposure appears to enhance knowledge, yet inconsistent education leaves students vulnerable to industry influence. Strengthening COI education within medical curricula is essential to promote ethical decision-making and uphold professional integrity.
期刊介绍:
PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides:
* Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright
* Fast publication times
* Peer review by expert, practicing researchers
* Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact
* Community-based dialogue on articles
* Worldwide media coverage