P Garg, K Y Yong, O Smibert, M K Yong, A Khanina, M A Slavin, L Hall, L J Worth
{"title":"INTERACT研究-澳大利亚癌症和移植人群护理中的感染预防和监测实践。","authors":"P Garg, K Y Yong, O Smibert, M K Yong, A Khanina, M A Slavin, L Hall, L J Worth","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australasian cancer and transplant populations are expanding, with increased infection risk related to prolonged survivorship and broader use of novel immunosuppressants. To optimise care, standardised approaches to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices and surveillance for the high-risk immunocompromised host (ICH) are required in Australasian healthcare facilities (HCFs). We sought to evaluate current practices to inform future policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among infectious disease (ID), microbiology, and IPC specialists caring for the high-risk ICH in Australasian HCFs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>140 healthcare-workers from all Australian jurisdictions and New Zealand responded, primarily employed within public (95.7%), non-specialist (77.9%) HCFs. Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance was common (75.7%) however monitoring for opportunistic infections (OIs) infrequent (22.9%). Although 51.4% reported a staff mask-wearing mandate on ICH wards, there was limited consensus on appropriate clinical setting for use, or application of other personal protective equipment (PPE). Strategies for multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) screening were heterogeneous. Challenges to ICH-IPC including lack of infrastructure and ICH-adapted policy were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first survey of IPC/surveillance practice in the care of the Australasian cancer/transplant population, demonstrating multiple areas of variation including PPE use and approach to MDRO surveillance. Practice standardisation will help optimise clinical care and reduce preventable infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The INTERACT study: Infection prevention and surveillance practice in the care of the Australasian cancer and transplant population.\",\"authors\":\"P Garg, K Y Yong, O Smibert, M K Yong, A Khanina, M A Slavin, L Hall, L J Worth\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Australasian cancer and transplant populations are expanding, with increased infection risk related to prolonged survivorship and broader use of novel immunosuppressants. To optimise care, standardised approaches to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices and surveillance for the high-risk immunocompromised host (ICH) are required in Australasian healthcare facilities (HCFs). We sought to evaluate current practices to inform future policy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among infectious disease (ID), microbiology, and IPC specialists caring for the high-risk ICH in Australasian HCFs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>140 healthcare-workers from all Australian jurisdictions and New Zealand responded, primarily employed within public (95.7%), non-specialist (77.9%) HCFs. Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance was common (75.7%) however monitoring for opportunistic infections (OIs) infrequent (22.9%). Although 51.4% reported a staff mask-wearing mandate on ICH wards, there was limited consensus on appropriate clinical setting for use, or application of other personal protective equipment (PPE). Strategies for multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) screening were heterogeneous. Challenges to ICH-IPC including lack of infrastructure and ICH-adapted policy were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first survey of IPC/surveillance practice in the care of the Australasian cancer/transplant population, demonstrating multiple areas of variation including PPE use and approach to MDRO surveillance. Practice standardisation will help optimise clinical care and reduce preventable infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of infection control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2025.07.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The INTERACT study: Infection prevention and surveillance practice in the care of the Australasian cancer and transplant population.
Background: Australasian cancer and transplant populations are expanding, with increased infection risk related to prolonged survivorship and broader use of novel immunosuppressants. To optimise care, standardised approaches to infection prevention and control (IPC) practices and surveillance for the high-risk immunocompromised host (ICH) are required in Australasian healthcare facilities (HCFs). We sought to evaluate current practices to inform future policy.
Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among infectious disease (ID), microbiology, and IPC specialists caring for the high-risk ICH in Australasian HCFs.
Results: 140 healthcare-workers from all Australian jurisdictions and New Zealand responded, primarily employed within public (95.7%), non-specialist (77.9%) HCFs. Healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance was common (75.7%) however monitoring for opportunistic infections (OIs) infrequent (22.9%). Although 51.4% reported a staff mask-wearing mandate on ICH wards, there was limited consensus on appropriate clinical setting for use, or application of other personal protective equipment (PPE). Strategies for multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) screening were heterogeneous. Challenges to ICH-IPC including lack of infrastructure and ICH-adapted policy were identified.
Conclusions: This is the first survey of IPC/surveillance practice in the care of the Australasian cancer/transplant population, demonstrating multiple areas of variation including PPE use and approach to MDRO surveillance. Practice standardisation will help optimise clinical care and reduce preventable infection.
期刊介绍:
AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)