剪切波弹性成像联合超声和磁共振成像诊断乳腺病变:一项单中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Wen-Yan Zhou, Lian-Lian Zhang, Xiao Zhou, Xian-Bin Pan, Long-Xiu Qi
{"title":"剪切波弹性成像联合超声和磁共振成像诊断乳腺病变:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Wen-Yan Zhou, Lian-Lian Zhang, Xiao Zhou, Xian-Bin Pan, Long-Xiu Qi","doi":"10.17219/acem/203584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer remains a major healthcare challenge, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis. Shear-wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasound-based imaging technique that quantifies tissue elasticity, has emerged as a promising tool. Recent studies suggest that SWE may provide additional diagnostic value when used alongside conventional imaging methods.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of SWE when combined with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with breast lesions who underwent SWE, conventional ultrasound and MRI. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated individually and in combination. Histopathological results served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Key performance metrics - sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy - were calculated for each imaging approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 99 patients were included in the study, comprising 64 with benign lesions and 35 with malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were generally larger and exhibited distinct imaging characteristics across ultrasound, SWE and MRI. When assessed individually, SWE, ultrasound and MRI showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (64.6%, 62.6% and 62.6%, respectively). However, combining all 3 modalities significantly improved diagnostic performance, yielding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of 94.3%, 89.1%, 82.5%, 96.6%, and 90.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined approach was significantly higher than for any single modality (0.917 vs 0.642, 0.627 and 0.633; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While SWE alone offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of ultrasound and MRI individually, its greatest value lies in combination with these imaging modalities. Integrating ultrasound, SWE and MRI significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, offering a promising multimodal approach for more reliable differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The diagnostic performance of shear-wave elastography combined with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in breast lesions: A single center retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Yan Zhou, Lian-Lian Zhang, Xiao Zhou, Xian-Bin Pan, Long-Xiu Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/acem/203584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer remains a major healthcare challenge, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis. Shear-wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasound-based imaging technique that quantifies tissue elasticity, has emerged as a promising tool. Recent studies suggest that SWE may provide additional diagnostic value when used alongside conventional imaging methods.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of SWE when combined with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of breast lesions.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with breast lesions who underwent SWE, conventional ultrasound and MRI. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated individually and in combination. Histopathological results served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Key performance metrics - sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy - were calculated for each imaging approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 99 patients were included in the study, comprising 64 with benign lesions and 35 with malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were generally larger and exhibited distinct imaging characteristics across ultrasound, SWE and MRI. When assessed individually, SWE, ultrasound and MRI showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (64.6%, 62.6% and 62.6%, respectively). However, combining all 3 modalities significantly improved diagnostic performance, yielding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of 94.3%, 89.1%, 82.5%, 96.6%, and 90.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined approach was significantly higher than for any single modality (0.917 vs 0.642, 0.627 and 0.633; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While SWE alone offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of ultrasound and MRI individually, its greatest value lies in combination with these imaging modalities. Integrating ultrasound, SWE and MRI significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, offering a promising multimodal approach for more reliable differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/203584\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/203584","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌仍然是一个主要的医疗保健挑战,强调需要早期和准确的诊断。剪切波弹性成像(SWE)是一种基于超声的组织弹性量化成像技术,已成为一种很有前途的工具。最近的研究表明,当与常规成像方法一起使用时,SWE可能提供额外的诊断价值。目的:本研究旨在评估SWE结合常规超声和磁共振成像(MRI)对乳腺病变的诊断价值。材料和方法:本回顾性研究纳入了接受SWE、常规超声和MRI检查的乳腺病变患者。对每种模式的诊断性能进行单独和联合评估。组织病理学结果作为诊断的金标准。计算每种成像方法的关键性能指标-敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)和总体准确性。结果:共纳入99例患者,其中良性病变64例,恶性病变35例。恶性病变一般较大,超声、超声和MRI表现出明显的影像学特征。单独评估时,SWE、超声和MRI的诊断准确率相当(分别为64.6%、62.6%和62.6%)。然而,结合所有3种方式可显著提高诊断性能,敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV和总体准确性分别为94.3%、89.1%、82.5%、96.6%和90.9% (p < 0.001)。联合方法的曲线下面积(AUC)显著高于任何单一模式(0.917 vs 0.642, 0.627和0.633;P < 0.001)。结论:虽然SWE的诊断性能可与超声和MRI相媲美,但其最大的价值在于与这些成像方式的结合。超声、SWE和MRI相结合可显著提高诊断的准确性、敏感性和特异性,为乳腺良恶性病变更可靠的鉴别提供了有前途的多模式方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The diagnostic performance of shear-wave elastography combined with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in breast lesions: A single center retrospective study.

Background: Breast cancer remains a major healthcare challenge, highlighting the need for early and accurate diagnosis. Shear-wave elastography (SWE), an ultrasound-based imaging technique that quantifies tissue elasticity, has emerged as a promising tool. Recent studies suggest that SWE may provide additional diagnostic value when used alongside conventional imaging methods.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of SWE when combined with conventional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of breast lesions.

Material and methods: This retrospective study included patients with breast lesions who underwent SWE, conventional ultrasound and MRI. The diagnostic performance of each modality was evaluated individually and in combination. Histopathological results served as the gold standard for diagnosis. Key performance metrics - sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy - were calculated for each imaging approach.

Results: A total of 99 patients were included in the study, comprising 64 with benign lesions and 35 with malignant lesions. Malignant lesions were generally larger and exhibited distinct imaging characteristics across ultrasound, SWE and MRI. When assessed individually, SWE, ultrasound and MRI showed comparable diagnostic accuracy (64.6%, 62.6% and 62.6%, respectively). However, combining all 3 modalities significantly improved diagnostic performance, yielding sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall accuracy of 94.3%, 89.1%, 82.5%, 96.6%, and 90.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). The area under the curve (AUC) for the combined approach was significantly higher than for any single modality (0.917 vs 0.642, 0.627 and 0.633; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: While SWE alone offers diagnostic performance comparable to that of ultrasound and MRI individually, its greatest value lies in combination with these imaging modalities. Integrating ultrasound, SWE and MRI significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, offering a promising multimodal approach for more reliable differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信