欧洲初级保健社会处方的最佳实践方法:德尔菲协议侧重于链接工人。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joyce Kenkre, Thomas Kloppe, Sinah Evers, Hendrik Napierala, Jean-Pierre Jacquet, Wolfram J Herrmann, Natasa Mrduljaš-Đujić, Andrea Neculau, Katerina Javorska, David Halata, Miriam Dolan, Joanne Robins, Patrick Ouvrard, Juan Manuel Mendive, Carmen López Fando, Jane Randall-Smith, Erwin Rebhandl, Sara Paternoster, Hans Thulesius, Sian Brand, Gindrovel Dumitra, Donata Kurpas
{"title":"欧洲初级保健社会处方的最佳实践方法:德尔菲协议侧重于链接工人。","authors":"Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joyce Kenkre, Thomas Kloppe, Sinah Evers, Hendrik Napierala, Jean-Pierre Jacquet, Wolfram J Herrmann, Natasa Mrduljaš-Đujić, Andrea Neculau, Katerina Javorska, David Halata, Miriam Dolan, Joanne Robins, Patrick Ouvrard, Juan Manuel Mendive, Carmen López Fando, Jane Randall-Smith, Erwin Rebhandl, Sara Paternoster, Hans Thulesius, Sian Brand, Gindrovel Dumitra, Donata Kurpas","doi":"10.17219/acem/208216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social prescribing (SP) is an innovative model that connects individuals to non-clinical community resources. However, its uptake and evaluation have been hindered by inconsistent role definitions for key stakeholders. Although recent studies have refined SP definitions, outside the UK, the responsibilities, educational backgrounds and training requirements of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) remain poorly defined. Additionally, it is essential to identify which patient populations will benefit most from SP, establish specific methodologies, and standardize assessment tools and referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We will employ a 3-round Delphi protocol with an international expert panel to establish consensus on SP definitions. Approximately 60 participants from diverse disciplines and regions will be recruited to complete multiple survey rounds, providing insights into the roles of SPLWs, beneficiary populations, methodologies, and assessment tools. Consensus will be defined as at least 80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Data collection and analysis will follow rigorous protocols to ensure validity, reliability and transparency, in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this research is to unify the fragmented understanding of SP and the role of SPLWs, thereby establishing a foundation for integrating SPLWs into healthcare systems where appropriate. The Delphi technique offers key strengths - namely, participant anonymity and structured iterative feedback - to enable robust consensus building. While we acknowledge limitations such as potential participant attrition and the resource-intensive nature of the methodology, these will be mitigated through targeted engagement strategies and strict adherence to established best practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study addresses critical gaps in SP engagement, conceptual understanding and implementation. The anticipated outcomes will reinforce SP's role in community-based, integrated care to reduce health inequalities and foster social cohesion across Europe and beyond. Ultimately, this work aims to enhance the uptake and adoption of SP in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1589-1595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practice approaches to social prescribing in European Primary Care: A Delphi protocol focused on link workers.\",\"authors\":\"Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joyce Kenkre, Thomas Kloppe, Sinah Evers, Hendrik Napierala, Jean-Pierre Jacquet, Wolfram J Herrmann, Natasa Mrduljaš-Đujić, Andrea Neculau, Katerina Javorska, David Halata, Miriam Dolan, Joanne Robins, Patrick Ouvrard, Juan Manuel Mendive, Carmen López Fando, Jane Randall-Smith, Erwin Rebhandl, Sara Paternoster, Hans Thulesius, Sian Brand, Gindrovel Dumitra, Donata Kurpas\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/acem/208216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social prescribing (SP) is an innovative model that connects individuals to non-clinical community resources. However, its uptake and evaluation have been hindered by inconsistent role definitions for key stakeholders. Although recent studies have refined SP definitions, outside the UK, the responsibilities, educational backgrounds and training requirements of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) remain poorly defined. Additionally, it is essential to identify which patient populations will benefit most from SP, establish specific methodologies, and standardize assessment tools and referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We will employ a 3-round Delphi protocol with an international expert panel to establish consensus on SP definitions. Approximately 60 participants from diverse disciplines and regions will be recruited to complete multiple survey rounds, providing insights into the roles of SPLWs, beneficiary populations, methodologies, and assessment tools. Consensus will be defined as at least 80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Data collection and analysis will follow rigorous protocols to ensure validity, reliability and transparency, in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this research is to unify the fragmented understanding of SP and the role of SPLWs, thereby establishing a foundation for integrating SPLWs into healthcare systems where appropriate. The Delphi technique offers key strengths - namely, participant anonymity and structured iterative feedback - to enable robust consensus building. While we acknowledge limitations such as potential participant attrition and the resource-intensive nature of the methodology, these will be mitigated through targeted engagement strategies and strict adherence to established best practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study addresses critical gaps in SP engagement, conceptual understanding and implementation. The anticipated outcomes will reinforce SP's role in community-based, integrated care to reduce health inequalities and foster social cohesion across Europe and beyond. Ultimately, this work aims to enhance the uptake and adoption of SP in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1589-1595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/208216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/208216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会处方(SP)是一种将个人与非临床社区资源联系起来的创新模式。然而,由于关键利益相关者的角色定义不一致,它的吸收和评价受到了阻碍。尽管最近的研究已经完善了SP的定义,但在英国以外,社会处方链接工作者(splw)的职责、教育背景和培训要求仍然定义不清。此外,必须确定哪些患者群体将从SP中受益最大,建立具体的方法,并标准化评估工具和转诊途径。材料和方法:我们将采用3轮德尔福协议与国际专家小组建立共识的SP定义。将招募来自不同学科和地区的约60名参与者完成多轮调查,深入了解社会福利工作者的作用、受益人群、方法和评估工具。共识将被定义为在5分李克特量表上至少80%的同意。数据收集和分析将遵循严格的协议,以确保有效性,可靠性和透明度,按照指导进行和报告德尔菲研究(CREDES)的指导方针。目的:本研究的目的是统一对SP和splw的作用的碎片化理解,从而为将splw纳入适当的医疗保健系统奠定基础。德尔菲技术提供了关键优势——即参与者匿名性和结构化迭代反馈——以实现强大的共识构建。虽然我们承认存在潜在的参与者流失和方法的资源密集型等局限性,但通过有针对性的参与策略和严格遵守既定的最佳实践,这些局限性将得到缓解。结论:本研究解决了SP参与、概念理解和实施方面的关键差距。预期的结果将加强SP在以社区为基础的综合护理方面的作用,以减少保健不平等现象,促进整个欧洲和其他地区的社会凝聚力。最终,这项工作旨在加强初级保健中SP的吸收和采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Best practice approaches to social prescribing in European Primary Care: A Delphi protocol focused on link workers.

Introduction: Social prescribing (SP) is an innovative model that connects individuals to non-clinical community resources. However, its uptake and evaluation have been hindered by inconsistent role definitions for key stakeholders. Although recent studies have refined SP definitions, outside the UK, the responsibilities, educational backgrounds and training requirements of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) remain poorly defined. Additionally, it is essential to identify which patient populations will benefit most from SP, establish specific methodologies, and standardize assessment tools and referral pathways.

Material and methods: We will employ a 3-round Delphi protocol with an international expert panel to establish consensus on SP definitions. Approximately 60 participants from diverse disciplines and regions will be recruited to complete multiple survey rounds, providing insights into the roles of SPLWs, beneficiary populations, methodologies, and assessment tools. Consensus will be defined as at least 80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Data collection and analysis will follow rigorous protocols to ensure validity, reliability and transparency, in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines.

Objectives: The aim of this research is to unify the fragmented understanding of SP and the role of SPLWs, thereby establishing a foundation for integrating SPLWs into healthcare systems where appropriate. The Delphi technique offers key strengths - namely, participant anonymity and structured iterative feedback - to enable robust consensus building. While we acknowledge limitations such as potential participant attrition and the resource-intensive nature of the methodology, these will be mitigated through targeted engagement strategies and strict adherence to established best practices.

Conclusion: This study addresses critical gaps in SP engagement, conceptual understanding and implementation. The anticipated outcomes will reinforce SP's role in community-based, integrated care to reduce health inequalities and foster social cohesion across Europe and beyond. Ultimately, this work aims to enhance the uptake and adoption of SP in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信