Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joyce Kenkre, Thomas Kloppe, Sinah Evers, Hendrik Napierala, Jean-Pierre Jacquet, Wolfram J Herrmann, Natasa Mrduljaš-Đujić, Andrea Neculau, Katerina Javorska, David Halata, Miriam Dolan, Joanne Robins, Patrick Ouvrard, Juan Manuel Mendive, Carmen López Fando, Jane Randall-Smith, Erwin Rebhandl, Sara Paternoster, Hans Thulesius, Sian Brand, Gindrovel Dumitra, Donata Kurpas
{"title":"欧洲初级保健社会处方的最佳实践方法:德尔菲协议侧重于链接工人。","authors":"Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joyce Kenkre, Thomas Kloppe, Sinah Evers, Hendrik Napierala, Jean-Pierre Jacquet, Wolfram J Herrmann, Natasa Mrduljaš-Đujić, Andrea Neculau, Katerina Javorska, David Halata, Miriam Dolan, Joanne Robins, Patrick Ouvrard, Juan Manuel Mendive, Carmen López Fando, Jane Randall-Smith, Erwin Rebhandl, Sara Paternoster, Hans Thulesius, Sian Brand, Gindrovel Dumitra, Donata Kurpas","doi":"10.17219/acem/208216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social prescribing (SP) is an innovative model that connects individuals to non-clinical community resources. However, its uptake and evaluation have been hindered by inconsistent role definitions for key stakeholders. Although recent studies have refined SP definitions, outside the UK, the responsibilities, educational backgrounds and training requirements of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) remain poorly defined. Additionally, it is essential to identify which patient populations will benefit most from SP, establish specific methodologies, and standardize assessment tools and referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We will employ a 3-round Delphi protocol with an international expert panel to establish consensus on SP definitions. Approximately 60 participants from diverse disciplines and regions will be recruited to complete multiple survey rounds, providing insights into the roles of SPLWs, beneficiary populations, methodologies, and assessment tools. Consensus will be defined as at least 80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Data collection and analysis will follow rigorous protocols to ensure validity, reliability and transparency, in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this research is to unify the fragmented understanding of SP and the role of SPLWs, thereby establishing a foundation for integrating SPLWs into healthcare systems where appropriate. The Delphi technique offers key strengths - namely, participant anonymity and structured iterative feedback - to enable robust consensus building. While we acknowledge limitations such as potential participant attrition and the resource-intensive nature of the methodology, these will be mitigated through targeted engagement strategies and strict adherence to established best practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study addresses critical gaps in SP engagement, conceptual understanding and implementation. The anticipated outcomes will reinforce SP's role in community-based, integrated care to reduce health inequalities and foster social cohesion across Europe and beyond. Ultimately, this work aims to enhance the uptake and adoption of SP in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1589-1595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best practice approaches to social prescribing in European Primary Care: A Delphi protocol focused on link workers.\",\"authors\":\"Ferdinando Petrazzuoli, Josep Vidal-Alaball, Joyce Kenkre, Thomas Kloppe, Sinah Evers, Hendrik Napierala, Jean-Pierre Jacquet, Wolfram J Herrmann, Natasa Mrduljaš-Đujić, Andrea Neculau, Katerina Javorska, David Halata, Miriam Dolan, Joanne Robins, Patrick Ouvrard, Juan Manuel Mendive, Carmen López Fando, Jane Randall-Smith, Erwin Rebhandl, Sara Paternoster, Hans Thulesius, Sian Brand, Gindrovel Dumitra, Donata Kurpas\",\"doi\":\"10.17219/acem/208216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social prescribing (SP) is an innovative model that connects individuals to non-clinical community resources. However, its uptake and evaluation have been hindered by inconsistent role definitions for key stakeholders. Although recent studies have refined SP definitions, outside the UK, the responsibilities, educational backgrounds and training requirements of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) remain poorly defined. Additionally, it is essential to identify which patient populations will benefit most from SP, establish specific methodologies, and standardize assessment tools and referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We will employ a 3-round Delphi protocol with an international expert panel to establish consensus on SP definitions. Approximately 60 participants from diverse disciplines and regions will be recruited to complete multiple survey rounds, providing insights into the roles of SPLWs, beneficiary populations, methodologies, and assessment tools. Consensus will be defined as at least 80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Data collection and analysis will follow rigorous protocols to ensure validity, reliability and transparency, in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this research is to unify the fragmented understanding of SP and the role of SPLWs, thereby establishing a foundation for integrating SPLWs into healthcare systems where appropriate. The Delphi technique offers key strengths - namely, participant anonymity and structured iterative feedback - to enable robust consensus building. While we acknowledge limitations such as potential participant attrition and the resource-intensive nature of the methodology, these will be mitigated through targeted engagement strategies and strict adherence to established best practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study addresses critical gaps in SP engagement, conceptual understanding and implementation. The anticipated outcomes will reinforce SP's role in community-based, integrated care to reduce health inequalities and foster social cohesion across Europe and beyond. Ultimately, this work aims to enhance the uptake and adoption of SP in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1589-1595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/208216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/208216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Best practice approaches to social prescribing in European Primary Care: A Delphi protocol focused on link workers.
Introduction: Social prescribing (SP) is an innovative model that connects individuals to non-clinical community resources. However, its uptake and evaluation have been hindered by inconsistent role definitions for key stakeholders. Although recent studies have refined SP definitions, outside the UK, the responsibilities, educational backgrounds and training requirements of social prescribing link workers (SPLWs) remain poorly defined. Additionally, it is essential to identify which patient populations will benefit most from SP, establish specific methodologies, and standardize assessment tools and referral pathways.
Material and methods: We will employ a 3-round Delphi protocol with an international expert panel to establish consensus on SP definitions. Approximately 60 participants from diverse disciplines and regions will be recruited to complete multiple survey rounds, providing insights into the roles of SPLWs, beneficiary populations, methodologies, and assessment tools. Consensus will be defined as at least 80% agreement on a 5-point Likert scale. Data collection and analysis will follow rigorous protocols to ensure validity, reliability and transparency, in accordance with the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines.
Objectives: The aim of this research is to unify the fragmented understanding of SP and the role of SPLWs, thereby establishing a foundation for integrating SPLWs into healthcare systems where appropriate. The Delphi technique offers key strengths - namely, participant anonymity and structured iterative feedback - to enable robust consensus building. While we acknowledge limitations such as potential participant attrition and the resource-intensive nature of the methodology, these will be mitigated through targeted engagement strategies and strict adherence to established best practices.
Conclusion: This study addresses critical gaps in SP engagement, conceptual understanding and implementation. The anticipated outcomes will reinforce SP's role in community-based, integrated care to reduce health inequalities and foster social cohesion across Europe and beyond. Ultimately, this work aims to enhance the uptake and adoption of SP in primary care.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly.
Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff.
Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj.
Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker.
The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition.
In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus.
Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.