{"title":"在复杂地形中评估WRF多尺度风模拟:来自perdig<s:1> Field Campaign的见解","authors":"Dania Al Oqaily, Paolo Giani, Paola Crippa","doi":"10.1029/2025JD044055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate microscale flow simulations are essential for assessing wind characteristics in complex terrain. This study evaluates a large ensemble of multiscale simulations, including large-eddy simulations (LES), using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) over Perdigão, Portugal, driven by boundary conditions from multiple global data sets. Simulations are compared with data from the Perdigão field campaign, including radiosonde and flux tower measurements. Results show that LES, using high-resolution topography and land use data, better replicate flow features and dynamics, providing valuable insights for wind resource quantification and mapping. We identify that model performance varies spatially. The RMSE of wind speed at 10 m at ridge towers is 5.65 m <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, while at valley towers, it is lower (2.28 m <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>s</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>), and variation across runs is greater for higher wind speeds. Temporally, surface winds show substantial variability throughout the day, posing greater modeling challenges during nighttime and synoptic transitions. This variability is not observed at 100 m, where topographic effects are less dominant and RMSE remains consistent across runs. Simulations driven by hourly boundary conditions perform best. However, drawing general conclusions about optimal turbulence modeling in the gray zone remains challenging due to microscale meteorology in complex terrain. Wind field characteristics are sensitive to turbulence scheme choice, particularly in the boundary layer, while above it, wind behavior is mainly influenced by boundary conditions. These results help identify key factors driving model variability and biases, which may guide future model developments to enhance wind flow simulation accuracy and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"130 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JD044055","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating WRF Multiscale Wind Simulations in Complex Terrain: Insights From the Perdigão Field Campaign\",\"authors\":\"Dania Al Oqaily, Paolo Giani, Paola Crippa\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025JD044055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Accurate microscale flow simulations are essential for assessing wind characteristics in complex terrain. This study evaluates a large ensemble of multiscale simulations, including large-eddy simulations (LES), using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) over Perdigão, Portugal, driven by boundary conditions from multiple global data sets. Simulations are compared with data from the Perdigão field campaign, including radiosonde and flux tower measurements. Results show that LES, using high-resolution topography and land use data, better replicate flow features and dynamics, providing valuable insights for wind resource quantification and mapping. We identify that model performance varies spatially. The RMSE of wind speed at 10 m at ridge towers is 5.65 m <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, while at valley towers, it is lower (2.28 m <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>s</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> ${\\\\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>), and variation across runs is greater for higher wind speeds. Temporally, surface winds show substantial variability throughout the day, posing greater modeling challenges during nighttime and synoptic transitions. This variability is not observed at 100 m, where topographic effects are less dominant and RMSE remains consistent across runs. Simulations driven by hourly boundary conditions perform best. However, drawing general conclusions about optimal turbulence modeling in the gray zone remains challenging due to microscale meteorology in complex terrain. Wind field characteristics are sensitive to turbulence scheme choice, particularly in the boundary layer, while above it, wind behavior is mainly influenced by boundary conditions. These results help identify key factors driving model variability and biases, which may guide future model developments to enhance wind flow simulation accuracy and reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"volume\":\"130 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025JD044055\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD044055\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025JD044055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
精确的微尺度流动模拟对于评估复杂地形中的风特性至关重要。本研究利用来自多个全球数据集的边界条件,利用天气研究与预报模式(WRF)对葡萄牙perdig o进行了包括大涡模拟(LES)在内的大型多尺度模拟。模拟与perdig o野外活动的数据进行了比较,包括无线电探空仪和通量塔测量。结果表明,利用高分辨率地形和土地利用数据,LES可以更好地复制风的特征和动态,为风资源的量化和制图提供有价值的见解。我们确定模型性能在空间上是不同的。岭塔10 m风速的RMSE为5.65 m s−1 ${\ mathm {s}}^{-1}$,谷塔10 m风速的RMSE为:风速较低(2.28 m s−1 ${\ maththrm {s}}^{-1}$),风速越高,运行间的变化越大。从时间上看,地面风全天都表现出很大的变化,在夜间和天气过渡期间对建模提出了更大的挑战。在100米处没有观察到这种变异性,在100米处地形影响不太明显,RMSE在各趟运行中保持一致。由小时边界条件驱动的模拟效果最好。然而,由于复杂地形的微尺度气象,在灰色地带得出最佳湍流模拟的一般结论仍然具有挑战性。湍流方案的选择对风场特征很敏感,特别是在边界层内,而在边界层以上,风场特征主要受边界条件的影响。这些结果有助于确定驱动模型变异和偏差的关键因素,这可能指导未来模型的发展,以提高风流模拟的准确性和可靠性。
Evaluating WRF Multiscale Wind Simulations in Complex Terrain: Insights From the Perdigão Field Campaign
Accurate microscale flow simulations are essential for assessing wind characteristics in complex terrain. This study evaluates a large ensemble of multiscale simulations, including large-eddy simulations (LES), using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) over Perdigão, Portugal, driven by boundary conditions from multiple global data sets. Simulations are compared with data from the Perdigão field campaign, including radiosonde and flux tower measurements. Results show that LES, using high-resolution topography and land use data, better replicate flow features and dynamics, providing valuable insights for wind resource quantification and mapping. We identify that model performance varies spatially. The RMSE of wind speed at 10 m at ridge towers is 5.65 m , while at valley towers, it is lower (2.28 m ), and variation across runs is greater for higher wind speeds. Temporally, surface winds show substantial variability throughout the day, posing greater modeling challenges during nighttime and synoptic transitions. This variability is not observed at 100 m, where topographic effects are less dominant and RMSE remains consistent across runs. Simulations driven by hourly boundary conditions perform best. However, drawing general conclusions about optimal turbulence modeling in the gray zone remains challenging due to microscale meteorology in complex terrain. Wind field characteristics are sensitive to turbulence scheme choice, particularly in the boundary layer, while above it, wind behavior is mainly influenced by boundary conditions. These results help identify key factors driving model variability and biases, which may guide future model developments to enhance wind flow simulation accuracy and reliability.
期刊介绍:
JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.