童年创伤和近期压力源在预测中国西南地区大学生亚临床精神病症状中的作用:性别特定框架内的机器学习分析

IF 4.9 0 PSYCHIATRY
Wanjie Tang,Zijian Deng,Zeyuan Sun,Qijun Zhao,Miguel Garcia-Argibay,Kadan Anoop,Tao Hu,Shuang Xue,Natali Bozhilova,Aldo Conti,Steve Lukito,Siqi Wu,Gang Wang,Chunhan Jin,Changjian Qiu,Qiaolan Liu,Jay Pan,Samuele Cortese,Katya Rubia
{"title":"童年创伤和近期压力源在预测中国西南地区大学生亚临床精神病症状中的作用:性别特定框架内的机器学习分析","authors":"Wanjie Tang,Zijian Deng,Zeyuan Sun,Qijun Zhao,Miguel Garcia-Argibay,Kadan Anoop,Tao Hu,Shuang Xue,Natali Bozhilova,Aldo Conti,Steve Lukito,Siqi Wu,Gang Wang,Chunhan Jin,Changjian Qiu,Qiaolan Liu,Jay Pan,Samuele Cortese,Katya Rubia","doi":"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nSubclinical psychotic symptoms (SPS) are common among college students and can lead to future mental health issues. However, it is still not clear which specific childhood trauma, stressors and health factors lead to SPSs, partly due to confounding factors and multicollinearity.\r\n\r\nOBJECTIVE\r\nTo use machine learning to find the main predictors of SPS among university students, with special attention to gender differences.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nA total of 21 208 university students were surveyed regarding SPS and a wide range of stress-related factors, including academic pressure, interpersonal difficulties and abuse. Nine machine learning models were used to predict SPS. We examined the relationship between SPS and individual stressors using χ2 tests, multicollinearity analysis and Pearson heatmaps. Feature engineering, t-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding (t-SNE) and Shapley Additive Explanation values helped identify the most important predictors. We also assessed calibration with calibration curves and Brier scores, and evaluated clinical usefulness with decision curve analysis (DCA) to provide a thorough assessment of the models. In addition, we validated this model using independent external data.\r\n\r\nFINDINGS\r\nThe Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model had the best prediction results, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.89, and validated with external data. It also showed good calibration, and DCA indicated clear clinical benefit. Interpersonal difficulties, academic pressure and emotional abuse emerged as the strongest predictors of SPS. Gender-stratified analyses revealed that academic pressure and emotional abuse affected males more, while health issues like chest pain and menstrual pain were stronger predictors for females.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nMachine learning models effectively identified key stressors associated with SPS in university students. These findings highlight the importance of gender-sensitive approaches for the early detection and prevention of psychotic symptoms.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\r\nSPSs in college students can be predicted by interpersonal difficulties, academic stress and childhood emotional abuse. This information can help mental health professionals develop better ways to prevent and address SPSs.","PeriodicalId":72434,"journal":{"name":"BMJ mental health","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Childhood trauma and recent stressors in predicting subclinical psychotic symptoms among Chinese university students in southwest China: a machine learning analysis within a gender-specific framework.\",\"authors\":\"Wanjie Tang,Zijian Deng,Zeyuan Sun,Qijun Zhao,Miguel Garcia-Argibay,Kadan Anoop,Tao Hu,Shuang Xue,Natali Bozhilova,Aldo Conti,Steve Lukito,Siqi Wu,Gang Wang,Chunhan Jin,Changjian Qiu,Qiaolan Liu,Jay Pan,Samuele Cortese,Katya Rubia\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjment-2025-301761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nSubclinical psychotic symptoms (SPS) are common among college students and can lead to future mental health issues. However, it is still not clear which specific childhood trauma, stressors and health factors lead to SPSs, partly due to confounding factors and multicollinearity.\\r\\n\\r\\nOBJECTIVE\\r\\nTo use machine learning to find the main predictors of SPS among university students, with special attention to gender differences.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nA total of 21 208 university students were surveyed regarding SPS and a wide range of stress-related factors, including academic pressure, interpersonal difficulties and abuse. Nine machine learning models were used to predict SPS. We examined the relationship between SPS and individual stressors using χ2 tests, multicollinearity analysis and Pearson heatmaps. Feature engineering, t-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding (t-SNE) and Shapley Additive Explanation values helped identify the most important predictors. We also assessed calibration with calibration curves and Brier scores, and evaluated clinical usefulness with decision curve analysis (DCA) to provide a thorough assessment of the models. In addition, we validated this model using independent external data.\\r\\n\\r\\nFINDINGS\\r\\nThe Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model had the best prediction results, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.89, and validated with external data. It also showed good calibration, and DCA indicated clear clinical benefit. Interpersonal difficulties, academic pressure and emotional abuse emerged as the strongest predictors of SPS. Gender-stratified analyses revealed that academic pressure and emotional abuse affected males more, while health issues like chest pain and menstrual pain were stronger predictors for females.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSIONS\\r\\nMachine learning models effectively identified key stressors associated with SPS in university students. These findings highlight the importance of gender-sensitive approaches for the early detection and prevention of psychotic symptoms.\\r\\n\\r\\nCLINICAL IMPLICATIONS\\r\\nSPSs in college students can be predicted by interpersonal difficulties, academic stress and childhood emotional abuse. This information can help mental health professionals develop better ways to prevent and address SPSs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjment-2025-301761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚临床精神病症状(SPS)在大学生中很常见,并可能导致未来的心理健康问题。然而,目前尚不清楚哪些特定的童年创伤、压力源和健康因素会导致SPSs,部分原因是混杂因素和多重共线性。目的利用机器学习方法寻找大学生SPS的主要预测因素,并特别关注性别差异。方法对21 208名大学生进行心理健康问题调查,并对学业压力、人际关系困难、受虐待等压力相关因素进行调查。使用了9个机器学习模型来预测SPS。我们使用χ2检验、多重共线性分析和Pearson热图检验了SPS与个体应激源之间的关系。特征工程、t分布随机邻域嵌入(t-SNE)和Shapley加性解释值帮助确定了最重要的预测因子。我们还通过校准曲线和Brier评分评估校准,并通过决策曲线分析(DCA)评估临床有用性,以提供对模型的全面评估。此外,我们使用独立的外部数据验证了该模型。结果极端梯度增强(XGBoost)模型预测效果最好,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.89,并得到了外部数据的验证。它也显示出良好的校准,DCA显示出明显的临床益处。人际关系困难、学业压力和情绪虐待是SPS的最强预测因子。性别分层分析显示,学业压力和情感虐待对男性的影响更大,而胸痛和经痛等健康问题对女性的影响更大。结论机器学习模型能有效识别与大学生SPS相关的关键应激源。这些发现强调了性别敏感的方法对早期发现和预防精神病症状的重要性。人际关系困难、学业压力和童年情绪虐待可以预测大学生的心理健康状况。这些信息可以帮助心理健康专业人员制定更好的方法来预防和解决SPSs。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Childhood trauma and recent stressors in predicting subclinical psychotic symptoms among Chinese university students in southwest China: a machine learning analysis within a gender-specific framework.
BACKGROUND Subclinical psychotic symptoms (SPS) are common among college students and can lead to future mental health issues. However, it is still not clear which specific childhood trauma, stressors and health factors lead to SPSs, partly due to confounding factors and multicollinearity. OBJECTIVE To use machine learning to find the main predictors of SPS among university students, with special attention to gender differences. METHODS A total of 21 208 university students were surveyed regarding SPS and a wide range of stress-related factors, including academic pressure, interpersonal difficulties and abuse. Nine machine learning models were used to predict SPS. We examined the relationship between SPS and individual stressors using χ2 tests, multicollinearity analysis and Pearson heatmaps. Feature engineering, t-distributed stochastic neighborhood embedding (t-SNE) and Shapley Additive Explanation values helped identify the most important predictors. We also assessed calibration with calibration curves and Brier scores, and evaluated clinical usefulness with decision curve analysis (DCA) to provide a thorough assessment of the models. In addition, we validated this model using independent external data. FINDINGS The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model had the best prediction results, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.89, and validated with external data. It also showed good calibration, and DCA indicated clear clinical benefit. Interpersonal difficulties, academic pressure and emotional abuse emerged as the strongest predictors of SPS. Gender-stratified analyses revealed that academic pressure and emotional abuse affected males more, while health issues like chest pain and menstrual pain were stronger predictors for females. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning models effectively identified key stressors associated with SPS in university students. These findings highlight the importance of gender-sensitive approaches for the early detection and prevention of psychotic symptoms. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS SPSs in college students can be predicted by interpersonal difficulties, academic stress and childhood emotional abuse. This information can help mental health professionals develop better ways to prevent and address SPSs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信