首次或多次复发艰难梭菌感染患者胃肠道微生物组和胆汁酸谱的可比性

Jessica A Bryant, Timothy J Straub, Darrell S Pardi, Kevin D Litcofsky, Colleen R Kelly, Meghan E Chafee, Stuart H Cohen, Sahil Khanna, Charles S Berenson, Jennifer Wortman, Matthew Sims, Christopher B Ford, Mary-Jane Lombardo, Barbara H McGovern, Lisa von Moltke, Colleen S Kraft, Matthew R Henn, Brooke R Hasson
{"title":"首次或多次复发艰难梭菌感染患者胃肠道微生物组和胆汁酸谱的可比性","authors":"Jessica A Bryant, Timothy J Straub, Darrell S Pardi, Kevin D Litcofsky, Colleen R Kelly, Meghan E Chafee, Stuart H Cohen, Sahil Khanna, Charles S Berenson, Jennifer Wortman, Matthew Sims, Christopher B Ford, Mary-Jane Lombardo, Barbara H McGovern, Lisa von Moltke, Colleen S Kraft, Matthew R Henn, Brooke R Hasson","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiaf408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treatment guidelines suggest varied approaches for patients with first (frCDI) or multiply recurrent CDI (mrCDI). Low microbial diversity, elevated primary bile acids (BA), and low secondary BA concentrations favor germination of C. difficile spores into toxin-producing bacteria and are believed to increase rCDI risk. Greater understanding of the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome in rCDI may inform management of the disease. We describe a post hoc comparison of GI microbiome and bile acid profiles between patients with frCDI and mrCDI in a Phase 3 open-label trial, ECOSPOR IV, of fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk (VOWST®; VOS, formerly SER-109), an orally-administered live microbiome therapeutic. Methods Patients received VOS following symptom resolution after standard-of-care antibiotics. Pre-treatment baseline (within 3 days following antibiotic completion) and week 1 post-dosing stool samples were collected for whole metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics. Diversity was calculated from MetaPhlAn2 species profiles. Concentrations of primary and secondary BAs were measured via targeted LC-MS/MS. Results rCDI rates through week 8 were similarly low in both frCDI and mrCDI patients (6.5% vs. 9.7%, respectively). Baseline microbial diversity was similarly low between frCDI and mrCDI subgroups (p>0.05). Diversity and secondary BA concentrations increased in both subgroups, whereas primary BA concentrations declined following VOS dosing, leading to few differences between subgroups at Week 1. Conclusions These data suggest commonalities in microbiome disruption in patients with frCDI and mrCDI that contribute to recurrence and suggest that antibiotics followed by a live microbiome therapy may be an optimal treatment strategy for rCDI, regardless of number of prior CDI recurrences.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparability of gastrointestinal microbiome and bile acid profiles in patients with first or multiply recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection\",\"authors\":\"Jessica A Bryant, Timothy J Straub, Darrell S Pardi, Kevin D Litcofsky, Colleen R Kelly, Meghan E Chafee, Stuart H Cohen, Sahil Khanna, Charles S Berenson, Jennifer Wortman, Matthew Sims, Christopher B Ford, Mary-Jane Lombardo, Barbara H McGovern, Lisa von Moltke, Colleen S Kraft, Matthew R Henn, Brooke R Hasson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/infdis/jiaf408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treatment guidelines suggest varied approaches for patients with first (frCDI) or multiply recurrent CDI (mrCDI). Low microbial diversity, elevated primary bile acids (BA), and low secondary BA concentrations favor germination of C. difficile spores into toxin-producing bacteria and are believed to increase rCDI risk. Greater understanding of the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome in rCDI may inform management of the disease. We describe a post hoc comparison of GI microbiome and bile acid profiles between patients with frCDI and mrCDI in a Phase 3 open-label trial, ECOSPOR IV, of fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk (VOWST®; VOS, formerly SER-109), an orally-administered live microbiome therapeutic. Methods Patients received VOS following symptom resolution after standard-of-care antibiotics. Pre-treatment baseline (within 3 days following antibiotic completion) and week 1 post-dosing stool samples were collected for whole metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics. Diversity was calculated from MetaPhlAn2 species profiles. Concentrations of primary and secondary BAs were measured via targeted LC-MS/MS. Results rCDI rates through week 8 were similarly low in both frCDI and mrCDI patients (6.5% vs. 9.7%, respectively). Baseline microbial diversity was similarly low between frCDI and mrCDI subgroups (p>0.05). Diversity and secondary BA concentrations increased in both subgroups, whereas primary BA concentrations declined following VOS dosing, leading to few differences between subgroups at Week 1. Conclusions These data suggest commonalities in microbiome disruption in patients with frCDI and mrCDI that contribute to recurrence and suggest that antibiotics followed by a live microbiome therapy may be an optimal treatment strategy for rCDI, regardless of number of prior CDI recurrences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Infectious Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiaf408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景艰难梭菌感染(CDI)的治疗指南建议对首次(frCDI)或多次复发CDI (mrCDI)患者采用不同的治疗方法。微生物多样性低、初级胆汁酸(BA)升高和次级胆汁酸(BA)浓度低有利于艰难梭菌孢子萌发为产毒细菌,并被认为会增加rCDI的风险。对rCDI患者胃肠道(GI)微生物组的进一步了解可能有助于该病的治疗。我们描述了在一项3期开放标签试验ECOSPOR IV中,frCDI和mrCDI患者的胃肠道微生物群和胆汁酸谱的即时比较,该试验使用粪便微生物群孢子,活体brpk (VOWST®;VOS,前身为SER-109),一种口服给药的活微生物组治疗药物。方法患者经标准治疗抗生素治疗后症状缓解后接受VOS治疗。收集治疗前基线(抗生素停用后3天内)和给药后第1周的粪便样本进行全宏基因组测序和代谢组学分析。多样性根据MetaPhlAn2物种剖面计算。采用靶向LC-MS/MS法测定主要和次要ba的浓度。结果frCDI和mrCDI患者在第8周的rCDI率同样较低(分别为6.5%和9.7%)。frCDI和mrCDI亚组之间的基线微生物多样性同样较低(p>0.05)。在两个亚组中,多样性和次级BA浓度都有所增加,而在VOS给药后,初级BA浓度下降,导致亚组之间在第1周的差异很小。结论:这些数据表明frCDI和mrCDI患者中微生物组破坏的共性有助于复发,并且表明抗生素治疗后的活微生物组治疗可能是rCDI的最佳治疗策略,无论之前的CDI复发次数如何。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparability of gastrointestinal microbiome and bile acid profiles in patients with first or multiply recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection
Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treatment guidelines suggest varied approaches for patients with first (frCDI) or multiply recurrent CDI (mrCDI). Low microbial diversity, elevated primary bile acids (BA), and low secondary BA concentrations favor germination of C. difficile spores into toxin-producing bacteria and are believed to increase rCDI risk. Greater understanding of the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome in rCDI may inform management of the disease. We describe a post hoc comparison of GI microbiome and bile acid profiles between patients with frCDI and mrCDI in a Phase 3 open-label trial, ECOSPOR IV, of fecal microbiota spores, live-brpk (VOWST®; VOS, formerly SER-109), an orally-administered live microbiome therapeutic. Methods Patients received VOS following symptom resolution after standard-of-care antibiotics. Pre-treatment baseline (within 3 days following antibiotic completion) and week 1 post-dosing stool samples were collected for whole metagenomic sequencing and metabolomics. Diversity was calculated from MetaPhlAn2 species profiles. Concentrations of primary and secondary BAs were measured via targeted LC-MS/MS. Results rCDI rates through week 8 were similarly low in both frCDI and mrCDI patients (6.5% vs. 9.7%, respectively). Baseline microbial diversity was similarly low between frCDI and mrCDI subgroups (p>0.05). Diversity and secondary BA concentrations increased in both subgroups, whereas primary BA concentrations declined following VOS dosing, leading to few differences between subgroups at Week 1. Conclusions These data suggest commonalities in microbiome disruption in patients with frCDI and mrCDI that contribute to recurrence and suggest that antibiotics followed by a live microbiome therapy may be an optimal treatment strategy for rCDI, regardless of number of prior CDI recurrences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信