执行功能与社会认知表现预测自闭症成人社交困难。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Autism Research Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1002/aur.70090
T. R. Wong, K. A. Boulton, E. A. Demetriou, E. E. Thomas, N. L. Phillips, L. Hankin, S. H. Park, I. B. Hickie, A. J. Guastella
{"title":"执行功能与社会认知表现预测自闭症成人社交困难。","authors":"T. R. Wong,&nbsp;K. A. Boulton,&nbsp;E. A. Demetriou,&nbsp;E. E. Thomas,&nbsp;N. L. Phillips,&nbsp;L. Hankin,&nbsp;S. H. Park,&nbsp;I. B. Hickie,&nbsp;A. J. Guastella","doi":"10.1002/aur.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There has been limited research aimed at understanding the cognitive features that predict outcomes in autistic adults. Difficulties in social cognition and executive function (EF) processes have been proposed as important cognitive components underlying social functioning outcomes. In this study, 305 autistic adults were administered a battery of social cognition, EF, and social functioning assessments to determine the degree to which social cognition and EF factors predicted outcomes. For social cognition, hierarchical regressions showed that EF explained neither theory of mind scores nor emotion recognition scores. We then ran several mediation models to determine whether EF explained social functioning independently of social cognition. These exploratory analyses show that poorer performance-based EF and social cognition both predicted more clinician-observed social challenges, while poorer self-reported EF and social cognition predicted more self-reported social challenges. Effects on outcomes were independent of each other. Our results highlight the potential of bot EF and social cognition measures to provide clinically meaningful markers for social functioning, but via separate pathways. This study supports the utility of targeting EF and social cognition processes in autistic adults in assessment and support pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":131,"journal":{"name":"Autism Research","volume":"18 9","pages":"1734-1745"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442527/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Executive Function and Social Cognition Performance Predicts Social Difficulty for Autistic Adults\",\"authors\":\"T. R. Wong,&nbsp;K. A. Boulton,&nbsp;E. A. Demetriou,&nbsp;E. E. Thomas,&nbsp;N. L. Phillips,&nbsp;L. Hankin,&nbsp;S. H. Park,&nbsp;I. B. Hickie,&nbsp;A. J. Guastella\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/aur.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>There has been limited research aimed at understanding the cognitive features that predict outcomes in autistic adults. Difficulties in social cognition and executive function (EF) processes have been proposed as important cognitive components underlying social functioning outcomes. In this study, 305 autistic adults were administered a battery of social cognition, EF, and social functioning assessments to determine the degree to which social cognition and EF factors predicted outcomes. For social cognition, hierarchical regressions showed that EF explained neither theory of mind scores nor emotion recognition scores. We then ran several mediation models to determine whether EF explained social functioning independently of social cognition. These exploratory analyses show that poorer performance-based EF and social cognition both predicted more clinician-observed social challenges, while poorer self-reported EF and social cognition predicted more self-reported social challenges. Effects on outcomes were independent of each other. Our results highlight the potential of bot EF and social cognition measures to provide clinically meaningful markers for social functioning, but via separate pathways. This study supports the utility of targeting EF and social cognition processes in autistic adults in assessment and support pathways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Autism Research\",\"volume\":\"18 9\",\"pages\":\"1734-1745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442527/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Autism Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Autism Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aur.70090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前,旨在了解预测成年自闭症患者预后的认知特征的研究非常有限。社会认知和执行功能(EF)过程的困难被认为是社会功能结果的重要认知成分。本研究对305名自闭症成人进行了一系列的社会认知、EF和社会功能评估,以确定社会认知和EF因素对结果的预测程度。在社会认知方面,层次回归显示EF既不能解释心理理论得分,也不能解释情绪识别得分。然后,我们运行了几个中介模型来确定EF是否独立于社会认知解释社会功能。这些探索性分析表明,较差的绩效EF和社会认知都预示着更多的临床观察到的社会挑战,而较差的自我报告EF和社会认知预示着更多的自我报告的社会挑战。对结果的影响是相互独立的。我们的研究结果强调了EF和社会认知测量的潜力,为社会功能提供临床有意义的标记,但通过不同的途径。本研究支持了自闭症成人的社会认知过程和定向EF在评估和支持通路中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Executive Function and Social Cognition Performance Predicts Social Difficulty for Autistic Adults

Executive Function and Social Cognition Performance Predicts Social Difficulty for Autistic Adults

There has been limited research aimed at understanding the cognitive features that predict outcomes in autistic adults. Difficulties in social cognition and executive function (EF) processes have been proposed as important cognitive components underlying social functioning outcomes. In this study, 305 autistic adults were administered a battery of social cognition, EF, and social functioning assessments to determine the degree to which social cognition and EF factors predicted outcomes. For social cognition, hierarchical regressions showed that EF explained neither theory of mind scores nor emotion recognition scores. We then ran several mediation models to determine whether EF explained social functioning independently of social cognition. These exploratory analyses show that poorer performance-based EF and social cognition both predicted more clinician-observed social challenges, while poorer self-reported EF and social cognition predicted more self-reported social challenges. Effects on outcomes were independent of each other. Our results highlight the potential of bot EF and social cognition measures to provide clinically meaningful markers for social functioning, but via separate pathways. This study supports the utility of targeting EF and social cognition processes in autistic adults in assessment and support pathways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Autism Research
Autism Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
8.50%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AUTISM RESEARCH will cover the developmental disorders known as Pervasive Developmental Disorders (or autism spectrum disorders – ASDs). The Journal focuses on basic genetic, neurobiological and psychological mechanisms and how these influence developmental processes in ASDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信