O Branco Luana, L Macedo Mônica, A M da Silva Natascha, Z Crivellenti Leandro, N Gouvêa Fernanda, S Pennacchi Caio, D B de Cerqueira Hévila, B Costa Paula, S Reis Natani, Borin-Crivellenti Sofia
{"title":"猫薄荷(Nepeta cataria)和猫面部信息素对医院环境中猫的临床和行为参数没有影响。","authors":"O Branco Luana, L Macedo Mônica, A M da Silva Natascha, Z Crivellenti Leandro, N Gouvêa Fernanda, S Pennacchi Caio, D B de Cerqueira Hévila, B Costa Paula, S Reis Natani, Borin-Crivellenti Sofia","doi":"10.1080/10888705.2025.2539158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of methods to promote feline well-being is common in veterinary medicine. This study evaluated whether exposure to catnip (Nepeta cataria) and feline facial pheromone alters vital or behavioral parameters in cats undergoing clinical examination with a cat friendly approach. This is relevant, as even minor changes in these parameters can affect the physical exam or clinical interpretation. Eight healthy cats were evaluated in a randomized, blinded study. Baseline data were collected in the home environment, and then the cats were transported, handled, and clinically assessed following Feline-Friendly Handling Guidelines. In a standard care room, the effects of catnip, feline facial pheromone, and a placebo (0.9% saline) were tested. Neither catnip nor pheromone produced significant changes in clinical or behavioral parameters. The tested substances were not able to alter parameters to the point of masking health changes in the animals. Thus, the cat friendly approach remains effective in minimizing stress and promoting positive experiences during clinical evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":56277,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Catnip (Nepeta cataria) and Feline Facial Pheromone Have No Effect on Clinical or Behavioral Parameters of Cats in Hospital Environment.\",\"authors\":\"O Branco Luana, L Macedo Mônica, A M da Silva Natascha, Z Crivellenti Leandro, N Gouvêa Fernanda, S Pennacchi Caio, D B de Cerqueira Hévila, B Costa Paula, S Reis Natani, Borin-Crivellenti Sofia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10888705.2025.2539158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The use of methods to promote feline well-being is common in veterinary medicine. This study evaluated whether exposure to catnip (Nepeta cataria) and feline facial pheromone alters vital or behavioral parameters in cats undergoing clinical examination with a cat friendly approach. This is relevant, as even minor changes in these parameters can affect the physical exam or clinical interpretation. Eight healthy cats were evaluated in a randomized, blinded study. Baseline data were collected in the home environment, and then the cats were transported, handled, and clinically assessed following Feline-Friendly Handling Guidelines. In a standard care room, the effects of catnip, feline facial pheromone, and a placebo (0.9% saline) were tested. Neither catnip nor pheromone produced significant changes in clinical or behavioral parameters. The tested substances were not able to alter parameters to the point of masking health changes in the animals. Thus, the cat friendly approach remains effective in minimizing stress and promoting positive experiences during clinical evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2539158\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888705.2025.2539158","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Catnip (Nepeta cataria) and Feline Facial Pheromone Have No Effect on Clinical or Behavioral Parameters of Cats in Hospital Environment.
The use of methods to promote feline well-being is common in veterinary medicine. This study evaluated whether exposure to catnip (Nepeta cataria) and feline facial pheromone alters vital or behavioral parameters in cats undergoing clinical examination with a cat friendly approach. This is relevant, as even minor changes in these parameters can affect the physical exam or clinical interpretation. Eight healthy cats were evaluated in a randomized, blinded study. Baseline data were collected in the home environment, and then the cats were transported, handled, and clinically assessed following Feline-Friendly Handling Guidelines. In a standard care room, the effects of catnip, feline facial pheromone, and a placebo (0.9% saline) were tested. Neither catnip nor pheromone produced significant changes in clinical or behavioral parameters. The tested substances were not able to alter parameters to the point of masking health changes in the animals. Thus, the cat friendly approach remains effective in minimizing stress and promoting positive experiences during clinical evaluations.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science (JAAWS) publishes articles on methods of experimentation, husbandry, and care that demonstrably enhance the welfare of nonhuman animals in various settings. For administrative purposes, manuscripts are categorized into the following four content areas: welfare issues arising in laboratory, farm, companion animal, and wildlife/zoo settings. Manuscripts of up to 7,000 words are accepted that present new empirical data or a reevaluation of available data, conceptual or theoretical analysis, or demonstrations relating to some issue of animal welfare science. JAAWS also publishes brief research reports of up to 3,500 words that consist of (1) pilot studies, (2) descriptions of innovative practices, (3) studies of interest to a particular region, or (4) studies done by scholars who are new to the field or new to academic publishing. In addition, JAAWS publishes book reviews and literature reviews by invitation only.