参与有心理障碍生活经验的人:心理科学社区参与测量发展的研究现状与未来方向。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Clinical Psychological Science Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1177/21677026241304339
Cassandra L Boness, Hanna Hebden, David T Lardier, Liliana Spurgeon, Ashli Timmons, Leonard J Simms, Kamilla L Venner, Katie Witkiewitz
{"title":"参与有心理障碍生活经验的人:心理科学社区参与测量发展的研究现状与未来方向。","authors":"Cassandra L Boness, Hanna Hebden, David T Lardier, Liliana Spurgeon, Ashli Timmons, Leonard J Simms, Kamilla L Venner, Katie Witkiewitz","doi":"10.1177/21677026241304339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.</p>","PeriodicalId":54234,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychological Science","volume":"13 4","pages":"720-739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra L Boness, Hanna Hebden, David T Lardier, Liliana Spurgeon, Ashli Timmons, Leonard J Simms, Kamilla L Venner, Katie Witkiewitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21677026241304339\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"720-739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312666/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241304339\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21677026241304339","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在心理科学中,得出有效结论的能力依赖于严格的测量发展。有心理障碍生活经历的人可以为测量开发过程做出宝贵的贡献,但他们经常被研究人员排除在这一过程之外。当有实际经验的人加入进来时,他们的贡献仅限于在过程的早期进行咨询。该综述提倡在整个度量开发过程中与有实际经验的人共享决策。我们概述了发展自我报告措施所涉及的阶段和步骤,强调了在每个步骤中有生活经验的人的关键贡献。接下来,在持续的社区参与研究的指导下,我们回顾了心理科学文献中的研究,这些研究采用了社区参与的测量开发方法,包括有心理障碍生活经历的人。最后,我们讨论了心理科学中社区参与测量发展的机遇和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Engaging people with lived experience of psychological disorders: Current research and future directions for community-engaged measure development in psychological science.

The ability to make valid conclusions in psychological science rests upon rigorous measure development. People with lived experience of psychological disorders can make invaluable contributions to the measure development process, but they are often excluded from this process by researchers. When people with lived experience are included, their contributions are limited to consultation early in the process. This review advocates for shared decision-making with people with lived experience throughout the measure development process. We provide an overview of the phases and steps involved in the development of self-report measures, highlighting the critical contributions of people with lived experience at each step. Next, guided by the continuum of community engagement in research, we review studies from the psychological science literature that embrace community-engaged measure development approaches inclusive of people with lived experience of psychological disorders. We conclude with a discussion of opportunities and challenges to community-engaged measure development in psychological science.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Psychological Science
Clinical Psychological Science Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: The Association for Psychological Science’s journal, Clinical Psychological Science, emerges from this confluence to provide readers with the best, most innovative research in clinical psychological science, giving researchers of all stripes a home for their work and a place in which to communicate with a broad audience of both clinical and other scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信