提高对受损细胞系的认识,更好的科学实践和问责制。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Virus Genes Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-31 DOI:10.1007/s11262-025-02180-0
Deilson Elgui de Oliveira, Maiara Venancio de Oliveira, Patricia de Cassia de Morais Pereira-Sanches
{"title":"提高对受损细胞系的认识,更好的科学实践和问责制。","authors":"Deilson Elgui de Oliveira, Maiara Venancio de Oliveira, Patricia de Cassia de Morais Pereira-Sanches","doi":"10.1007/s11262-025-02180-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This comment raises concerns about the validity and reproducibility of a publication by Li et al. in Virus Genes (60:488-500, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-024-02096-1 ; PMID: 39103702), which aimed to investigate the role of aquaporin-3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and its regulation by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). The central criticism focuses on using the CNE-1, CNE-2, and HONE-1 cell lines, which are recognized as unreliable for NPC research. There is an alarming prevalence of publications that continue to utilize these compromised cell lines, impeding genuine advancements in understanding NPC. Beyond the cell line authenticity issue, the study lacks relevant methodological information and justification for experimental design choices. We emphasize the need for raw data availability and comprehensive methodological information to ensure reproducibility. Ultimately, this comment calls for a more rigorous and multi-faceted approach to quality control in scientific publishing and embracing Open Science principles to ensure the reliability of published research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51212,"journal":{"name":"Virus Genes","volume":" ","pages":"544-546"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raising Awareness About Compromised Cell Lines, Better Science Practices, and Accountability.\",\"authors\":\"Deilson Elgui de Oliveira, Maiara Venancio de Oliveira, Patricia de Cassia de Morais Pereira-Sanches\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11262-025-02180-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This comment raises concerns about the validity and reproducibility of a publication by Li et al. in Virus Genes (60:488-500, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-024-02096-1 ; PMID: 39103702), which aimed to investigate the role of aquaporin-3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and its regulation by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). The central criticism focuses on using the CNE-1, CNE-2, and HONE-1 cell lines, which are recognized as unreliable for NPC research. There is an alarming prevalence of publications that continue to utilize these compromised cell lines, impeding genuine advancements in understanding NPC. Beyond the cell line authenticity issue, the study lacks relevant methodological information and justification for experimental design choices. We emphasize the need for raw data availability and comprehensive methodological information to ensure reproducibility. Ultimately, this comment calls for a more rigorous and multi-faceted approach to quality control in scientific publishing and embracing Open Science principles to ensure the reliability of published research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virus Genes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"544-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virus Genes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-025-02180-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virus Genes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-025-02180-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一评论引起了人们对Li等人在病毒基因(60:488- 500,2024)上发表的一篇文章的有效性和可重复性的担忧。https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262 - 024 - 02096 - 1;PMID: 39103702),旨在探讨水通道蛋白-3在鼻咽癌(NPC)中的作用及其受eb病毒(EBV)潜伏膜蛋白1 (LMP1)的调控。主要批评集中在使用CNE-1、CNE-2和HONE-1细胞系,这些细胞系被认为不可靠,不能用于NPC研究。令人担忧的是,继续利用这些受损细胞系的出版物普遍存在,阻碍了对NPC的真正理解。除了细胞系真实性问题之外,该研究缺乏相关的方法信息和实验设计选择的理由。我们强调需要原始数据的可用性和全面的方法信息,以确保再现性。最后,这一评论呼吁在科学出版中采用更严格和多方面的质量控制方法,并采用开放科学原则来确保已发表研究的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Raising Awareness About Compromised Cell Lines, Better Science Practices, and Accountability.

This comment raises concerns about the validity and reproducibility of a publication by Li et al. in Virus Genes (60:488-500, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-024-02096-1 ; PMID: 39103702), which aimed to investigate the role of aquaporin-3 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) and its regulation by the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) latent membrane protein 1 (LMP1). The central criticism focuses on using the CNE-1, CNE-2, and HONE-1 cell lines, which are recognized as unreliable for NPC research. There is an alarming prevalence of publications that continue to utilize these compromised cell lines, impeding genuine advancements in understanding NPC. Beyond the cell line authenticity issue, the study lacks relevant methodological information and justification for experimental design choices. We emphasize the need for raw data availability and comprehensive methodological information to ensure reproducibility. Ultimately, this comment calls for a more rigorous and multi-faceted approach to quality control in scientific publishing and embracing Open Science principles to ensure the reliability of published research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Virus Genes
Virus Genes 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Viruses are convenient models for the elucidation of life processes. The study of viruses is again on the cutting edge of biological sciences: systems biology, genomics, proteomics, metagenomics, using the newest most powerful tools. Huge amounts of new details on virus interactions with the cell, other pathogens and the hosts – animal (including human), insect, fungal, plant, bacterial, and archaeal - and their role in infection and disease are forthcoming in perplexing details requiring analysis and comments. Virus Genes is dedicated to the publication of studies on the structure and function of viruses and their genes, the molecular and systems interactions with the host and all applications derived thereof, providing a forum for the analysis of data and discussion of its implications, and the development of new hypotheses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信