Jennifer Sudkamp, Neil Roach, Shaun Beebe, Jessica Metcalf, Paul McGraw
{"title":"专业知识调节了授权枪支警察的视觉抽样策略。","authors":"Jennifer Sudkamp, Neil Roach, Shaun Beebe, Jessica Metcalf, Paul McGraw","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2025.2540417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>High-risk incidents require responders to rapidly detect, sample, and interpret critical visual information. To understand how experience shapes these abilities, we used mobile eye-tracking to examine expertise-related differences in gaze behaviour of Authorised Firearms Officers during simulated tactical scenarios. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the number, duration, and horizontal spread of fixations moderately discriminated between expert and novice officers, with experts tending to perform more, but shorter fixations that were distributed more broadly. Experts also exhibited greater consistency in gaze location even when suspects were hidden from sight, suggesting they shared expectations about where threats may emerge. In the moments leading up to operational responses, experts increased their fixation durations, indicating more deliberate visual preparation. We also evaluated which visual features best explained fixation locations. A model combining low-level saliency with a focus on suspects' waistlines provided the most accurate account of officers' gaze patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expertise modulates visual sampling strategies in authorised firearms police officers.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Sudkamp, Neil Roach, Shaun Beebe, Jessica Metcalf, Paul McGraw\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2025.2540417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>High-risk incidents require responders to rapidly detect, sample, and interpret critical visual information. To understand how experience shapes these abilities, we used mobile eye-tracking to examine expertise-related differences in gaze behaviour of Authorised Firearms Officers during simulated tactical scenarios. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the number, duration, and horizontal spread of fixations moderately discriminated between expert and novice officers, with experts tending to perform more, but shorter fixations that were distributed more broadly. Experts also exhibited greater consistency in gaze location even when suspects were hidden from sight, suggesting they shared expectations about where threats may emerge. In the moments leading up to operational responses, experts increased their fixation durations, indicating more deliberate visual preparation. We also evaluated which visual features best explained fixation locations. A model combining low-level saliency with a focus on suspects' waistlines provided the most accurate account of officers' gaze patterns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2540417\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2540417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expertise modulates visual sampling strategies in authorised firearms police officers.
High-risk incidents require responders to rapidly detect, sample, and interpret critical visual information. To understand how experience shapes these abilities, we used mobile eye-tracking to examine expertise-related differences in gaze behaviour of Authorised Firearms Officers during simulated tactical scenarios. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed that the number, duration, and horizontal spread of fixations moderately discriminated between expert and novice officers, with experts tending to perform more, but shorter fixations that were distributed more broadly. Experts also exhibited greater consistency in gaze location even when suspects were hidden from sight, suggesting they shared expectations about where threats may emerge. In the moments leading up to operational responses, experts increased their fixation durations, indicating more deliberate visual preparation. We also evaluated which visual features best explained fixation locations. A model combining low-level saliency with a focus on suspects' waistlines provided the most accurate account of officers' gaze patterns.
期刊介绍:
Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives.
The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people.
All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.