正在进行的苏丹战争期间苏丹卫生保健工作者的职业倦怠和应对机制:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed, Ahmed Balla M Ahmed, Salma Alrawa, Ludn Emad Ebrahim Mustafa, Mahmoud Elsadig Mahmoud Ali, Mohammed Osman Omer Abdalla, Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed
{"title":"正在进行的苏丹战争期间苏丹卫生保健工作者的职业倦怠和应对机制:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed, Ahmed Balla M Ahmed, Salma Alrawa, Ludn Emad Ebrahim Mustafa, Mahmoud Elsadig Mahmoud Ali, Mohammed Osman Omer Abdalla, Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed","doi":"10.1186/s12995-025-00472-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the Sudan war, healthcare workers have encountered extraordinary challenges, including physical assaults and the immense strain of delivering care with critically limited resources. These conditions are likely to intensify burnout among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of burnout among Sudanese healthcare workers and investigate the coping mechanisms they employ during the ongoing conflict.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among Sudanese healthcare workers using the standardized Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of burnout domains. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered for all statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High emotional exhaustion was reported by 13.7% of participants, while 56.5% experienced high depersonalization, and only 4.4% reported low levels of personal accomplishment. The leading coping mechanism was talking with friends and family, adopted by 28.8% of participants, while 15.5% turned to spiritual or religious practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sudanese healthcare workers demonstrate high levels of burnout, particularly in the depersonalization domain, with talking to friends and family being the most commonly used coping mechanism. Future research is needed to explore the unique stressors faced by healthcare workers in conflict-affected settings like ours.</p>","PeriodicalId":48903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","volume":"20 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Burnout and coping mechanisms among Sudanese healthcare workers during the ongoing Sudan war: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Muhannad Bushra Masaad Ahmed, Ahmed Balla M Ahmed, Salma Alrawa, Ludn Emad Ebrahim Mustafa, Mahmoud Elsadig Mahmoud Ali, Mohammed Osman Omer Abdalla, Sohaib Mohammed Mokhtar Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12995-025-00472-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the Sudan war, healthcare workers have encountered extraordinary challenges, including physical assaults and the immense strain of delivering care with critically limited resources. These conditions are likely to intensify burnout among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of burnout among Sudanese healthcare workers and investigate the coping mechanisms they employ during the ongoing conflict.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among Sudanese healthcare workers using the standardized Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of burnout domains. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered for all statistical tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High emotional exhaustion was reported by 13.7% of participants, while 56.5% experienced high depersonalization, and only 4.4% reported low levels of personal accomplishment. The leading coping mechanism was talking with friends and family, adopted by 28.8% of participants, while 15.5% turned to spiritual or religious practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sudanese healthcare workers demonstrate high levels of burnout, particularly in the depersonalization domain, with talking to friends and family being the most commonly used coping mechanism. Future research is needed to explore the unique stressors faced by healthcare workers in conflict-affected settings like ours.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12312341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-025-00472-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-025-00472-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在苏丹战争期间,卫生保健工作者遇到了非同寻常的挑战,包括人身攻击和以极其有限的资源提供护理的巨大压力。这些情况可能会加剧医疗保健专业人员的职业倦怠。本研究旨在确定苏丹卫生保健工作者中职业倦怠的患病率,并调查他们在持续冲突期间采用的应对机制。方法:采用标准化的Maslach职业倦怠量表-人类服务调查(MBI-HSS)对苏丹卫生保健工作者进行了横断面研究。采用多变量线性回归分析确定职业倦怠领域的独立预测因素。结果:13.7%的参与者有高度情绪耗竭,56.5%的参与者有高度人格解体,只有4.4%的参与者有低水平的个人成就感。28.8%的受访者采用与朋友和家人交谈的主要应对机制,15.5%的受访者则求助于精神或宗教活动。结论:苏丹卫生保健工作者表现出高度的倦怠,特别是在人格解体领域,与朋友和家人交谈是最常用的应对机制。未来的研究需要探索医疗工作者在像我们这样受冲突影响的环境中所面临的独特压力源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Burnout and coping mechanisms among Sudanese healthcare workers during the ongoing Sudan war: a cross-sectional study.

Burnout and coping mechanisms among Sudanese healthcare workers during the ongoing Sudan war: a cross-sectional study.

Background: During the Sudan war, healthcare workers have encountered extraordinary challenges, including physical assaults and the immense strain of delivering care with critically limited resources. These conditions are likely to intensify burnout among healthcare professionals. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of burnout among Sudanese healthcare workers and investigate the coping mechanisms they employ during the ongoing conflict.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among Sudanese healthcare workers using the standardized Maslach Burnout Inventory - Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of burnout domains. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered for all statistical tests.

Results: High emotional exhaustion was reported by 13.7% of participants, while 56.5% experienced high depersonalization, and only 4.4% reported low levels of personal accomplishment. The leading coping mechanism was talking with friends and family, adopted by 28.8% of participants, while 15.5% turned to spiritual or religious practices.

Conclusion: Sudanese healthcare workers demonstrate high levels of burnout, particularly in the depersonalization domain, with talking to friends and family being the most commonly used coping mechanism. Future research is needed to explore the unique stressors faced by healthcare workers in conflict-affected settings like ours.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Aimed at clinicians and researchers, the Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology is a multi-disciplinary, open access journal which publishes original research on the clinical and scientific aspects of occupational and environmental health. With high-quality peer review and quick decision times, we welcome submissions on the diagnosis, prevention, management, and scientific analysis of occupational diseases, injuries, and disability. The journal also covers the promotion of health of workers, their families, and communities, and ranges from rehabilitation to tropical medicine and public health aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信