Laia Llubes-Arrià, Erica Briones-Vozmediano, José Tomás Mateos, Joaquim Sol-Cullere, Montserrat Gea-Sánchez, Esther Rubinat-Arnaldo
{"title":"多重慢性疾病患者自我管理激活的性别差异:一项定性研究","authors":"Laia Llubes-Arrià, Erica Briones-Vozmediano, José Tomás Mateos, Joaquim Sol-Cullere, Montserrat Gea-Sánchez, Esther Rubinat-Arnaldo","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01686-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity significantly affects patients' quality of life and poses a growing challenge for healthcare systems worldwide, particularly in ageing populations. Effective self-management is key to improving health outcomes, yet gender plays a crucial role in shaping patients' experiences and approaches to managing chronic conditions. This study aimed to explore gender differences in self-management among individuals living with multiple chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study using in-depth semi-structured interviews with 43 patients, purposively sampled to capture variation in age, socioeconomic background, and healthcare setting. Interviews explored experiences of self-management among both women and men, and data were analysed thematically to identify patterns across narratives. Thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data, and findings were interpreted in alignment with the domains of the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six main themes emerged: personal responsibility, health literacy, self-management and decision-making, communication with healthcare professionals, adherence and treatment monitoring, prevention of complications, and lifestyle modifications. Importantly, gender differences significantly shaped patients' engagement with self-management across all thematic areas. Women generally demonstrated a more proactive approach, while men were more likely to depend on external support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights distinct gendered approaches to chronic illness management. Women tended to actively engage in self-care and frequently took on informal caregiving responsibilities, pointing to the need for interventions that support shared decision-making and alleviate caregiver burden. In contrast, men were generally more reliant on others and less inclined to seek help, emphasizing the importance of fostering autonomy, enhancing health literacy, and encouraging early engagement with healthcare services. These findings underscore the value of gender-sensitive, patient-centred approaches in chronic disease management to improve health outcomes and reduce disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"200"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in self-management activation among patients with multiple chronic diseases: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Laia Llubes-Arrià, Erica Briones-Vozmediano, José Tomás Mateos, Joaquim Sol-Cullere, Montserrat Gea-Sánchez, Esther Rubinat-Arnaldo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01686-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multimorbidity significantly affects patients' quality of life and poses a growing challenge for healthcare systems worldwide, particularly in ageing populations. Effective self-management is key to improving health outcomes, yet gender plays a crucial role in shaping patients' experiences and approaches to managing chronic conditions. This study aimed to explore gender differences in self-management among individuals living with multiple chronic diseases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study using in-depth semi-structured interviews with 43 patients, purposively sampled to capture variation in age, socioeconomic background, and healthcare setting. Interviews explored experiences of self-management among both women and men, and data were analysed thematically to identify patterns across narratives. Thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data, and findings were interpreted in alignment with the domains of the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six main themes emerged: personal responsibility, health literacy, self-management and decision-making, communication with healthcare professionals, adherence and treatment monitoring, prevention of complications, and lifestyle modifications. Importantly, gender differences significantly shaped patients' engagement with self-management across all thematic areas. Women generally demonstrated a more proactive approach, while men were more likely to depend on external support.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlights distinct gendered approaches to chronic illness management. Women tended to actively engage in self-care and frequently took on informal caregiving responsibilities, pointing to the need for interventions that support shared decision-making and alleviate caregiver burden. In contrast, men were generally more reliant on others and less inclined to seek help, emphasizing the importance of fostering autonomy, enhancing health literacy, and encouraging early engagement with healthcare services. These findings underscore the value of gender-sensitive, patient-centred approaches in chronic disease management to improve health outcomes and reduce disparities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12315370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01686-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01686-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Gender differences in self-management activation among patients with multiple chronic diseases: a qualitative study.
Background: Multimorbidity significantly affects patients' quality of life and poses a growing challenge for healthcare systems worldwide, particularly in ageing populations. Effective self-management is key to improving health outcomes, yet gender plays a crucial role in shaping patients' experiences and approaches to managing chronic conditions. This study aimed to explore gender differences in self-management among individuals living with multiple chronic diseases.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative phenomenological study using in-depth semi-structured interviews with 43 patients, purposively sampled to capture variation in age, socioeconomic background, and healthcare setting. Interviews explored experiences of self-management among both women and men, and data were analysed thematically to identify patterns across narratives. Thematic analysis was applied to the qualitative data, and findings were interpreted in alignment with the domains of the Patient Activation Measure-13 (PAM-13).
Results: Six main themes emerged: personal responsibility, health literacy, self-management and decision-making, communication with healthcare professionals, adherence and treatment monitoring, prevention of complications, and lifestyle modifications. Importantly, gender differences significantly shaped patients' engagement with self-management across all thematic areas. Women generally demonstrated a more proactive approach, while men were more likely to depend on external support.
Conclusions: This study highlights distinct gendered approaches to chronic illness management. Women tended to actively engage in self-care and frequently took on informal caregiving responsibilities, pointing to the need for interventions that support shared decision-making and alleviate caregiver burden. In contrast, men were generally more reliant on others and less inclined to seek help, emphasizing the importance of fostering autonomy, enhancing health literacy, and encouraging early engagement with healthcare services. These findings underscore the value of gender-sensitive, patient-centred approaches in chronic disease management to improve health outcomes and reduce disparities.
期刊介绍:
rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.