工作记忆的学习依赖调节。

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Frida A B Printzlau, Athanasios Bourganos, Keisuke Fukuda, Michael L Mack
{"title":"工作记忆的学习依赖调节。","authors":"Frida A B Printzlau, Athanasios Bourganos, Keisuke Fukuda, Michael L Mack","doi":"10.3758/s13421-025-01754-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Category knowledge helps us make inferences and decisions but may also bias how information is perceived and remembered. Previous studies have reported categorical biases in working memory (WM), but mostly for highly familiar features with category structure established through life-long exposure (e.g., colour). Key unanswered questions are how quickly category biases arise following new learning and how biases are shaped by the nature of prior experience. Across three experiments, we asked how new category learning biases WM reports (total N = 180). Participants learned to categorise novel shapes in a brief training session (10-15 min). Training either emphasised category prototypes (Experiment 1) or the category boundary (Experiment 2). Following learning, they performed a two-item WM task where category was irrelevant. New category learning modulated WM-guided behaviour in two ways. First, training improved WM accuracy for the most familiar areas of feature space. Second, we found category-dependent bias of WM reports following training that stressed category prototypes but not category boundaries, compared to a control experiment with no learning (Experiment 3). Category bias scaled with the distance from the category boundary and was driven by trials when memory items belonged to distinct categories. Our results show that even newly learned categories may act as priors for WM, but biases may depend on the specific nature of prior experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48398,"journal":{"name":"Memory & Cognition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning-dependent modulation of working memory.\",\"authors\":\"Frida A B Printzlau, Athanasios Bourganos, Keisuke Fukuda, Michael L Mack\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13421-025-01754-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Category knowledge helps us make inferences and decisions but may also bias how information is perceived and remembered. Previous studies have reported categorical biases in working memory (WM), but mostly for highly familiar features with category structure established through life-long exposure (e.g., colour). Key unanswered questions are how quickly category biases arise following new learning and how biases are shaped by the nature of prior experience. Across three experiments, we asked how new category learning biases WM reports (total N = 180). Participants learned to categorise novel shapes in a brief training session (10-15 min). Training either emphasised category prototypes (Experiment 1) or the category boundary (Experiment 2). Following learning, they performed a two-item WM task where category was irrelevant. New category learning modulated WM-guided behaviour in two ways. First, training improved WM accuracy for the most familiar areas of feature space. Second, we found category-dependent bias of WM reports following training that stressed category prototypes but not category boundaries, compared to a control experiment with no learning (Experiment 3). Category bias scaled with the distance from the category boundary and was driven by trials when memory items belonged to distinct categories. Our results show that even newly learned categories may act as priors for WM, but biases may depend on the specific nature of prior experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Memory & Cognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01754-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory & Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-025-01754-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

类别知识有助于我们进行推断和决策,但也可能会影响信息的感知和记忆方式。先前的研究报道了工作记忆(WM)中的类别偏见,但主要是针对通过终身接触建立的高度熟悉的类别结构特征(如颜色)。关键的未解决的问题是,在新学习之后,类别偏见产生的速度有多快,以及偏见是如何被先前经验的性质所塑造的。在三个实验中,我们询问了WM报告的新类别学习偏差(总N = 180)。参与者在一个简短的训练中(10-15分钟)学会了对新奇的形状进行分类。训练要么强调类别原型(实验1),要么强调类别边界(实验2)。在学习之后,他们执行了一个两项WM任务,其中类别无关。新类别学习以两种方式调节wm引导行为。首先,训练提高了特征空间中最熟悉区域的WM精度。其次,与没有学习的对照实验(实验3)相比,我们发现在训练后强调类别原型而不是类别边界的WM报告存在类别依赖偏差。类别偏差随距离类别边界的远近而增加,并由不同类别的记忆项目驱动。我们的研究结果表明,即使是新学习的类别也可能作为WM的先验,但偏差可能取决于先验经验的具体性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning-dependent modulation of working memory.

Category knowledge helps us make inferences and decisions but may also bias how information is perceived and remembered. Previous studies have reported categorical biases in working memory (WM), but mostly for highly familiar features with category structure established through life-long exposure (e.g., colour). Key unanswered questions are how quickly category biases arise following new learning and how biases are shaped by the nature of prior experience. Across three experiments, we asked how new category learning biases WM reports (total N = 180). Participants learned to categorise novel shapes in a brief training session (10-15 min). Training either emphasised category prototypes (Experiment 1) or the category boundary (Experiment 2). Following learning, they performed a two-item WM task where category was irrelevant. New category learning modulated WM-guided behaviour in two ways. First, training improved WM accuracy for the most familiar areas of feature space. Second, we found category-dependent bias of WM reports following training that stressed category prototypes but not category boundaries, compared to a control experiment with no learning (Experiment 3). Category bias scaled with the distance from the category boundary and was driven by trials when memory items belonged to distinct categories. Our results show that even newly learned categories may act as priors for WM, but biases may depend on the specific nature of prior experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Memory & Cognition
Memory & Cognition PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Memory & Cognition covers human memory and learning, conceptual processes, psycholinguistics, problem solving, thinking, decision making, and skilled performance, including relevant work in the areas of computer simulation, information processing, mathematical psychology, developmental psychology, and experimental social psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信