Lee Smith, Rachael S Burke, Fleur Kelsey, Lauren Addington
{"title":"选择彩虹:分析恶意调查回应。","authors":"Lee Smith, Rachael S Burke, Fleur Kelsey, Lauren Addington","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2540369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In late 2022, a collaborative research study was designed by a group of polytechnic researchers that aimed to explore how safe and inclusive the various campuses of New Zealand's polytechnic sector were for rainbow students. Two online surveys were distributed to students and staff in 14 of the nation's 16 polytechnics. One of the surveys was designed to be completed by rainbow students and the other, by cisgender (cis) heterosexual students and all staff. In the rainbow survey response data, numerous malicious responses were recorded, which contained cis heteronormative, racist and ableist slurs, threats, and hate speech. Rather than simply deleting these comments as irrelevant and offensive, a theoretical analysis, consisting of central tenets of queer theory, transfeminism and intersectionality, was undertaken. Results show that these comments referenced outdated societal stereotypes, which in turn, continue to reproduce societal marginalisations. The respondents were also reliant on the negation of \"others\" to create their own identity, thus highlighting the fragility of their own self-concept. It is important to trouble malicious anonymous online survey responses because they perpetuate harm and undermine equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coopting the Rainbow: Analyzing Malicious Survey Responses.\",\"authors\":\"Lee Smith, Rachael S Burke, Fleur Kelsey, Lauren Addington\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2540369\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In late 2022, a collaborative research study was designed by a group of polytechnic researchers that aimed to explore how safe and inclusive the various campuses of New Zealand's polytechnic sector were for rainbow students. Two online surveys were distributed to students and staff in 14 of the nation's 16 polytechnics. One of the surveys was designed to be completed by rainbow students and the other, by cisgender (cis) heterosexual students and all staff. In the rainbow survey response data, numerous malicious responses were recorded, which contained cis heteronormative, racist and ableist slurs, threats, and hate speech. Rather than simply deleting these comments as irrelevant and offensive, a theoretical analysis, consisting of central tenets of queer theory, transfeminism and intersectionality, was undertaken. Results show that these comments referenced outdated societal stereotypes, which in turn, continue to reproduce societal marginalisations. The respondents were also reliant on the negation of \\\"others\\\" to create their own identity, thus highlighting the fragility of their own self-concept. It is important to trouble malicious anonymous online survey responses because they perpetuate harm and undermine equity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2540369\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2540369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Coopting the Rainbow: Analyzing Malicious Survey Responses.
In late 2022, a collaborative research study was designed by a group of polytechnic researchers that aimed to explore how safe and inclusive the various campuses of New Zealand's polytechnic sector were for rainbow students. Two online surveys were distributed to students and staff in 14 of the nation's 16 polytechnics. One of the surveys was designed to be completed by rainbow students and the other, by cisgender (cis) heterosexual students and all staff. In the rainbow survey response data, numerous malicious responses were recorded, which contained cis heteronormative, racist and ableist slurs, threats, and hate speech. Rather than simply deleting these comments as irrelevant and offensive, a theoretical analysis, consisting of central tenets of queer theory, transfeminism and intersectionality, was undertaken. Results show that these comments referenced outdated societal stereotypes, which in turn, continue to reproduce societal marginalisations. The respondents were also reliant on the negation of "others" to create their own identity, thus highlighting the fragility of their own self-concept. It is important to trouble malicious anonymous online survey responses because they perpetuate harm and undermine equity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.