在复杂的卫生行为改变干预措施中处理保真问题:对保真框架和模型的范围审查。

IF 9.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Elaine Toomey, Daphne To, Nicole Nathan, Molly Byrne, Fabianna Lorencatto, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Nicola McCleary, Heather Colquhoun
{"title":"在复杂的卫生行为改变干预措施中处理保真问题:对保真框架和模型的范围审查。","authors":"Elaine Toomey, Daphne To, Nicole Nathan, Molly Byrne, Fabianna Lorencatto, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Nicola McCleary, Heather Colquhoun","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2025.2534001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fidelity is an important but under-addressed aspect of health behaviour change intervention research. Consensus is lacking regarding terminology, definitions, and conceptualisations. Fidelity frameworks and models can help people address fidelity in a structured way and ensure clarity and consistency of terminology, but they are underutilised to date. We aimed to identify and describe existing fidelity frameworks/models and compare these in terms of fidelity constructs included. We conducted a scoping review using a pre-specified search, dual independent screening, and data extraction. We analysed data using basic descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. We identified 20 fidelity frameworks/models. All frameworks/models included constructs relating to intervention delivery. All frameworks/models also included additional constructs; however, there was a lack of consensus across these, and whether they are components or moderators of fidelity. For health behaviour change researchers wishing to address fidelity, selecting a comprehensive framework/model that facilitates consideration of multiple constructs and that aligns with their intended purpose and context may be beneficial. Fidelity is a multi-faceted concept of which delivery is an important, but not the only, construct. Findings will help researchers consider fidelity in greater depth, apply and refine existing frameworks/models, and improve how fidelity is addressed in future behavioural interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing fidelity within complex health behaviour change interventions: a scoping review of fidelity frameworks and models.\",\"authors\":\"Elaine Toomey, Daphne To, Nicole Nathan, Molly Byrne, Fabianna Lorencatto, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Nicola McCleary, Heather Colquhoun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17437199.2025.2534001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fidelity is an important but under-addressed aspect of health behaviour change intervention research. Consensus is lacking regarding terminology, definitions, and conceptualisations. Fidelity frameworks and models can help people address fidelity in a structured way and ensure clarity and consistency of terminology, but they are underutilised to date. We aimed to identify and describe existing fidelity frameworks/models and compare these in terms of fidelity constructs included. We conducted a scoping review using a pre-specified search, dual independent screening, and data extraction. We analysed data using basic descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. We identified 20 fidelity frameworks/models. All frameworks/models included constructs relating to intervention delivery. All frameworks/models also included additional constructs; however, there was a lack of consensus across these, and whether they are components or moderators of fidelity. For health behaviour change researchers wishing to address fidelity, selecting a comprehensive framework/model that facilitates consideration of multiple constructs and that aligns with their intended purpose and context may be beneficial. Fidelity is a multi-faceted concept of which delivery is an important, but not the only, construct. Findings will help researchers consider fidelity in greater depth, apply and refine existing frameworks/models, and improve how fidelity is addressed in future behavioural interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Psychology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2534001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2025.2534001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

忠诚是健康行为改变干预研究中一个重要但未得到充分重视的方面。在术语、定义和概念化方面缺乏共识。保真度框架和模型可以帮助人们以结构化的方式解决保真度问题,并确保术语的清晰度和一致性,但迄今为止,它们尚未得到充分利用。我们的目的是识别和描述现有的保真度框架/模型,并在保真度结构方面对它们进行比较。我们使用预先指定的搜索、双重独立筛选和数据提取进行了范围审查。我们使用基本的描述性统计和定性内容分析来分析数据。我们确定了20个保真度框架/模型。所有框架/模型都包含与干预交付相关的构造。所有框架/模型还包括额外的结构;然而,在这些方面缺乏共识,以及它们是保真度的组成部分还是调节因素。对于希望解决保真问题的健康行为改变研究人员来说,选择一个全面的框架/模型,促进对多种结构的考虑,并与他们的预期目的和背景保持一致,可能是有益的。忠诚是一个多方面的概念,交付是一个重要的,但不是唯一的结构。研究结果将有助于研究人员更深入地考虑保真度,应用和完善现有框架/模型,并改进在未来行为干预中如何解决保真度问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing fidelity within complex health behaviour change interventions: a scoping review of fidelity frameworks and models.

Fidelity is an important but under-addressed aspect of health behaviour change intervention research. Consensus is lacking regarding terminology, definitions, and conceptualisations. Fidelity frameworks and models can help people address fidelity in a structured way and ensure clarity and consistency of terminology, but they are underutilised to date. We aimed to identify and describe existing fidelity frameworks/models and compare these in terms of fidelity constructs included. We conducted a scoping review using a pre-specified search, dual independent screening, and data extraction. We analysed data using basic descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. We identified 20 fidelity frameworks/models. All frameworks/models included constructs relating to intervention delivery. All frameworks/models also included additional constructs; however, there was a lack of consensus across these, and whether they are components or moderators of fidelity. For health behaviour change researchers wishing to address fidelity, selecting a comprehensive framework/model that facilitates consideration of multiple constructs and that aligns with their intended purpose and context may be beneficial. Fidelity is a multi-faceted concept of which delivery is an important, but not the only, construct. Findings will help researchers consider fidelity in greater depth, apply and refine existing frameworks/models, and improve how fidelity is addressed in future behavioural interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信