H Parize, F Munhoz, C Cordeiro, N Meier, J Kleinheinz, D C Laganá, N Sesma, L Bohner
{"title":"T1和T2磁共振方案对种植牙规划中骨体积测量和图像质量的影响。","authors":"H Parize, F Munhoz, C Cordeiro, N Meier, J Kleinheinz, D C Laganá, N Sesma, L Bohner","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2907Parize10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols (T1- and T2-weighted) with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for measurement of bone volume and image quality in edentulous mandible during dental implant planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phantom was scanned using CBCT and MRI and two examiners measured bone volume (linear measurements) and assessed image quality (visualization of anatomical structures) with 5-point scale. Linear measurement reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient, and group differences with Friedman's and Wilcoxon's tests. The image quality ratings were classified as clinically nonvalid (score≤2) or valid (score≥3), reliability was assessed with percentage of agreement, and group differences with chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability of linear measurements was mostly very good for CBCT (0.748- 0.981), good for T1-weighted (0.674-0.924), and fair to T2-weighted images (0.201- 0.851). Significant differences were observed between imaging exams (p⟨.032) and between T1- and T2-weighted images (p⟨.046), except for alveolar ridge height (p=.119). CBCT showed the highest agreement and validity (100%), followed by T2-weighted (80% agreement, 90% validity), and T1-weighted (77% agreement, 82.5% validity), with no significant differences among modalities (p=.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to CBCT, T1- and T2-weighted MRI protocols had significantly lower reproducibility and accuracy in measuring bone volume, with reduced image quality, especially for visualizing the mandibular nerve canal.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":"228-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of T1 and T2 Magnetic Resonance Protocols on Bone Volume Measurement and Image Quality During Dental Implant Planning.\",\"authors\":\"H Parize, F Munhoz, C Cordeiro, N Meier, J Kleinheinz, D C Laganá, N Sesma, L Bohner\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2907Parize10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols (T1- and T2-weighted) with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for measurement of bone volume and image quality in edentulous mandible during dental implant planning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A phantom was scanned using CBCT and MRI and two examiners measured bone volume (linear measurements) and assessed image quality (visualization of anatomical structures) with 5-point scale. Linear measurement reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient, and group differences with Friedman's and Wilcoxon's tests. The image quality ratings were classified as clinically nonvalid (score≤2) or valid (score≥3), reliability was assessed with percentage of agreement, and group differences with chi-squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reliability of linear measurements was mostly very good for CBCT (0.748- 0.981), good for T1-weighted (0.674-0.924), and fair to T2-weighted images (0.201- 0.851). Significant differences were observed between imaging exams (p⟨.032) and between T1- and T2-weighted images (p⟨.046), except for alveolar ridge height (p=.119). CBCT showed the highest agreement and validity (100%), followed by T2-weighted (80% agreement, 90% validity), and T1-weighted (77% agreement, 82.5% validity), with no significant differences among modalities (p=.054).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to CBCT, T1- and T2-weighted MRI protocols had significantly lower reproducibility and accuracy in measuring bone volume, with reduced image quality, especially for visualizing the mandibular nerve canal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"228-237\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2907Parize10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2907Parize10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of T1 and T2 Magnetic Resonance Protocols on Bone Volume Measurement and Image Quality During Dental Implant Planning.
Objective: Compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols (T1- and T2-weighted) with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for measurement of bone volume and image quality in edentulous mandible during dental implant planning.
Methods: A phantom was scanned using CBCT and MRI and two examiners measured bone volume (linear measurements) and assessed image quality (visualization of anatomical structures) with 5-point scale. Linear measurement reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficient, and group differences with Friedman's and Wilcoxon's tests. The image quality ratings were classified as clinically nonvalid (score≤2) or valid (score≥3), reliability was assessed with percentage of agreement, and group differences with chi-squared test.
Results: Reliability of linear measurements was mostly very good for CBCT (0.748- 0.981), good for T1-weighted (0.674-0.924), and fair to T2-weighted images (0.201- 0.851). Significant differences were observed between imaging exams (p⟨.032) and between T1- and T2-weighted images (p⟨.046), except for alveolar ridge height (p=.119). CBCT showed the highest agreement and validity (100%), followed by T2-weighted (80% agreement, 90% validity), and T1-weighted (77% agreement, 82.5% validity), with no significant differences among modalities (p=.054).
Conclusions: Compared to CBCT, T1- and T2-weighted MRI protocols had significantly lower reproducibility and accuracy in measuring bone volume, with reduced image quality, especially for visualizing the mandibular nerve canal.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.