解决医疗保健领域过度使用和使用不足的矛盾。

IF 3.1 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Bjørn Hofmann
{"title":"解决医疗保健领域过度使用和使用不足的矛盾。","authors":"Bjørn Hofmann","doi":"10.1007/s11019-025-10287-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a basic contradiction in modern healthcare: while there is an urgent need for more resources to provide documented effective care in many health systems, the same systems provide extensive services that are reported to have little or no effect on people's health. This induces long wait times, delayed diagnoses and treatments, poorer prognosis, and worse outcomes. That is, a wide range of studies have demonstrated health care systems to provide large volumes of low-value services while not being able to provide much needed high-value services. This contradiction between simultaneous overuse and underuse can be analysed in a paradox framework. Moreover, identifying the drivers of overuse and underuse can help us develop strategies to curb the problem, its implications, and free resources for reducing underuse. Hence, resolving the overuse-underuse paradox is crucial for the viability of healthcare systems: for the safety, quality, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47449,"journal":{"name":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the overuse-underuse paradox in healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Bjørn Hofmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11019-025-10287-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a basic contradiction in modern healthcare: while there is an urgent need for more resources to provide documented effective care in many health systems, the same systems provide extensive services that are reported to have little or no effect on people's health. This induces long wait times, delayed diagnoses and treatments, poorer prognosis, and worse outcomes. That is, a wide range of studies have demonstrated health care systems to provide large volumes of low-value services while not being able to provide much needed high-value services. This contradiction between simultaneous overuse and underuse can be analysed in a paradox framework. Moreover, identifying the drivers of overuse and underuse can help us develop strategies to curb the problem, its implications, and free resources for reducing underuse. Hence, resolving the overuse-underuse paradox is crucial for the viability of healthcare systems: for the safety, quality, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10287-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine Health Care and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-025-10287-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现代卫生保健存在一个基本矛盾:虽然许多卫生系统迫切需要更多资源来提供有记录的有效护理,但据报道,这些系统提供的广泛服务对人们的健康影响很小或没有影响。这导致等待时间长,诊断和治疗延迟,预后较差,结果更差。也就是说,广泛的研究表明,卫生保健系统提供大量低价值服务,而无法提供急需的高价值服务。这种同时过度使用和使用不足的矛盾可以用悖论的框架来分析。此外,确定过度使用和使用不足的驱动因素可以帮助我们制定策略来遏制问题及其影响,并为减少使用不足腾出资源。因此,解决过度使用-使用不足的矛盾对于医疗保健系统的可行性至关重要:对于护理的安全性,质量,有效性,效率和可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing the overuse-underuse paradox in healthcare.

There is a basic contradiction in modern healthcare: while there is an urgent need for more resources to provide documented effective care in many health systems, the same systems provide extensive services that are reported to have little or no effect on people's health. This induces long wait times, delayed diagnoses and treatments, poorer prognosis, and worse outcomes. That is, a wide range of studies have demonstrated health care systems to provide large volumes of low-value services while not being able to provide much needed high-value services. This contradiction between simultaneous overuse and underuse can be analysed in a paradox framework. Moreover, identifying the drivers of overuse and underuse can help us develop strategies to curb the problem, its implications, and free resources for reducing underuse. Hence, resolving the overuse-underuse paradox is crucial for the viability of healthcare systems: for the safety, quality, effectiveness, efficiency, and sustainability of care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy: A European Journal is the official journal of the European Society for Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care. It provides a forum for international exchange of research data, theories, reports and opinions in bioethics and philosophy of medicine. The journal promotes interdisciplinary studies, and stimulates philosophical analysis centered on a common object of reflection: health care, the human effort to deal with disease, illness, death as well as health, well-being and life. Particular attention is paid to developing contributions from all European countries, and to making accessible scientific work and reports on the practice of health care ethics, from all nations, cultures and language areas in Europe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信