{"title":"评估内支架植入物股骨等距放置精度及其对TPLO后椎枢移位现象处理中膝关节稳定性的影响。","authors":"Sebastian Wylie, Miguel A Solano, Alan Danielski","doi":"10.1111/vsu.14319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of accurate isometric placement of internal brace implants on stifle stability following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) in dogs with pivot shift phenomenon and to propose a novel classification system for pivot shift grading.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 39 dogs (46 stifles) undergoing TPLO with internal brace augmentation using SwiveLock and FASTak implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records, intraoperative assessments, and radiographs were reviewed. Femoral implant positioning was classified as accurate or inaccurate. Pivot shift was graded pre-, intraoperatively, and at 6-week follow-up using a simplified two-grade system. Learning curves for implant accuracy were compared between implant types. Statistical analyses included χ<sup>2</sup> and t-tests, with significance set at p < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accurate implant positioning was achieved in 29 of 46 stifles (63.0%). SwiveLock implants were significantly more likely to be accurately placed than FASTak anchors (p = .016), with higher patient weight correlating with improved accuracy (p = .012). SwiveLock implants reached an accuracy rate of 78.6% compared to 38.9% for FASTak (p = .014). At follow-up, mean pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles (p < .001). Inaccurate implant positioning was significantly associated with increased internal tibial rotation (p = .009) but not with the pivot shift grade (p = .142).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate isometric placement of internal brace implants is critical for optimizing stifle stability and addressing pivot shift following TPLO.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Enhanced implant accuracy and a standardized pivot shift classification may improve surgical outcomes and guide postoperative management in dogs.</p>","PeriodicalId":23667,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1316-1325"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO.\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Wylie, Miguel A Solano, Alan Danielski\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vsu.14319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of accurate isometric placement of internal brace implants on stifle stability following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) in dogs with pivot shift phenomenon and to propose a novel classification system for pivot shift grading.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>A total of 39 dogs (46 stifles) undergoing TPLO with internal brace augmentation using SwiveLock and FASTak implants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records, intraoperative assessments, and radiographs were reviewed. Femoral implant positioning was classified as accurate or inaccurate. Pivot shift was graded pre-, intraoperatively, and at 6-week follow-up using a simplified two-grade system. Learning curves for implant accuracy were compared between implant types. Statistical analyses included χ<sup>2</sup> and t-tests, with significance set at p < .05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Accurate implant positioning was achieved in 29 of 46 stifles (63.0%). SwiveLock implants were significantly more likely to be accurately placed than FASTak anchors (p = .016), with higher patient weight correlating with improved accuracy (p = .012). SwiveLock implants reached an accuracy rate of 78.6% compared to 38.9% for FASTak (p = .014). At follow-up, mean pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles (p < .001). Inaccurate implant positioning was significantly associated with increased internal tibial rotation (p = .009) but not with the pivot shift grade (p = .142).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Accurate isometric placement of internal brace implants is critical for optimizing stifle stability and addressing pivot shift following TPLO.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Enhanced implant accuracy and a standardized pivot shift classification may improve surgical outcomes and guide postoperative management in dogs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1316-1325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14319\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14319","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of femoral isometric placement accuracy of internal brace implants and its impact on stifle stability in the management of pivot shift phenomenon following TPLO.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of accurate isometric placement of internal brace implants on stifle stability following tibial plateau leveling osteotomy (TPLO) in dogs with pivot shift phenomenon and to propose a novel classification system for pivot shift grading.
Study design: Retrospective observational study.
Animals: A total of 39 dogs (46 stifles) undergoing TPLO with internal brace augmentation using SwiveLock and FASTak implants.
Methods: Medical records, intraoperative assessments, and radiographs were reviewed. Femoral implant positioning was classified as accurate or inaccurate. Pivot shift was graded pre-, intraoperatively, and at 6-week follow-up using a simplified two-grade system. Learning curves for implant accuracy were compared between implant types. Statistical analyses included χ2 and t-tests, with significance set at p < .05.
Results: Accurate implant positioning was achieved in 29 of 46 stifles (63.0%). SwiveLock implants were significantly more likely to be accurately placed than FASTak anchors (p = .016), with higher patient weight correlating with improved accuracy (p = .012). SwiveLock implants reached an accuracy rate of 78.6% compared to 38.9% for FASTak (p = .014). At follow-up, mean pivot shift grade improved in 90.9% of stifles (p < .001). Inaccurate implant positioning was significantly associated with increased internal tibial rotation (p = .009) but not with the pivot shift grade (p = .142).
Conclusion: Accurate isometric placement of internal brace implants is critical for optimizing stifle stability and addressing pivot shift following TPLO.
Clinical significance: Enhanced implant accuracy and a standardized pivot shift classification may improve surgical outcomes and guide postoperative management in dogs.
期刊介绍:
Veterinary Surgery, the official publication of the American College of Veterinary Surgeons and European College of Veterinary Surgeons, is a source of up-to-date coverage of surgical and anesthetic management of animals, addressing significant problems in veterinary surgery with relevant case histories and observations.
It contains original, peer-reviewed articles that cover developments in veterinary surgery, and presents the most current review of the field, with timely articles on surgical techniques, diagnostic aims, care of infections, and advances in knowledge of metabolism as it affects the surgical patient. The journal places new developments in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary to help better understand and evaluate the surgical patient.