应用血清炎症指标预测可切除食管鳞状细胞癌对新辅助抗pd -1化疗的病理反应。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Peng Song, Zhiyuan Yao, Shuai Song, Zengjin Wen, Xiao Sun, Changlei Li, Huansong Yang, Wenjie Jiao, Yong Cui, Dong Chang
{"title":"应用血清炎症指标预测可切除食管鳞状细胞癌对新辅助抗pd -1化疗的病理反应。","authors":"Peng Song, Zhiyuan Yao, Shuai Song, Zengjin Wen, Xiao Sun, Changlei Li, Huansong Yang, Wenjie Jiao, Yong Cui, Dong Chang","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-11590-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory indexes are increasingly being considered to predict treatment response in tumors. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of serum inflammatory indexes in predicting pathological response in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving anti-PD-1 neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data from 116 ESCC patients who received NICT. We set three outcome variables: pathologic complete response (PCR), good response (GR), and response (R). We assessed between-group differences in inflammation indexes and their diagnostic efficacy. Independent diagnostic markers were filtered using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression and multivariable analysis, and the corresponding nomograms for PCR and GR were constructed, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and calibration curves assessed the efficiency and accuracy of the models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) evaluated the clinical value. Moreover, we internally validated the predictive model with a random sample of 30% of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predicted a cutoff value of 53.585 for PCR with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.720, a cutoff value of 47.85 for GR with an AUC of 0.723, a cutoff value of 47.85 for R with an AUC of 0.629. Smoking and PNI were independent predictors of PCR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and PNI were independent predictors of GR, and PNI was an independent predictor of R. We built PNI-based nomograms to predict PCR and GR with AUC values of 0.795 and 0.763 for the training cohort and 0.907 and 0.757 for the validation cohort, respectively. The predicted and actual results of the calibration curves for both the training and validation groups showed good agreement, with Brier scores below 0.25.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High PNI value is a shared independent predictor of achieving PCR, GR, and R in ESCC patients receiving anti-PD1 NICT. PNI-based diagnostic models can be used as a practical tool to identify ideal patients for personalized clinical decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"27914"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting pathological response of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 with chemotherapy using serum inflammation indexes.\",\"authors\":\"Peng Song, Zhiyuan Yao, Shuai Song, Zengjin Wen, Xiao Sun, Changlei Li, Huansong Yang, Wenjie Jiao, Yong Cui, Dong Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-11590-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory indexes are increasingly being considered to predict treatment response in tumors. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of serum inflammatory indexes in predicting pathological response in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving anti-PD-1 neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data from 116 ESCC patients who received NICT. We set three outcome variables: pathologic complete response (PCR), good response (GR), and response (R). We assessed between-group differences in inflammation indexes and their diagnostic efficacy. Independent diagnostic markers were filtered using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression and multivariable analysis, and the corresponding nomograms for PCR and GR were constructed, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and calibration curves assessed the efficiency and accuracy of the models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) evaluated the clinical value. Moreover, we internally validated the predictive model with a random sample of 30% of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predicted a cutoff value of 53.585 for PCR with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.720, a cutoff value of 47.85 for GR with an AUC of 0.723, a cutoff value of 47.85 for R with an AUC of 0.629. Smoking and PNI were independent predictors of PCR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and PNI were independent predictors of GR, and PNI was an independent predictor of R. We built PNI-based nomograms to predict PCR and GR with AUC values of 0.795 and 0.763 for the training cohort and 0.907 and 0.757 for the validation cohort, respectively. The predicted and actual results of the calibration curves for both the training and validation groups showed good agreement, with Brier scores below 0.25.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High PNI value is a shared independent predictor of achieving PCR, GR, and R in ESCC patients receiving anti-PD1 NICT. PNI-based diagnostic models can be used as a practical tool to identify ideal patients for personalized clinical decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"27914\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12313942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11590-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-11590-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:炎症指数越来越多地被认为是预测肿瘤治疗反应的指标。本研究旨在探讨血清炎症指标对食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者接受抗pd -1新辅助免疫化疗(NICT)病理反应的预测作用。方法:回顾性收集116例接受NICT治疗的ESCC患者的临床和实验室资料。我们设置了三个结局变量:病理完全缓解(PCR)、良好缓解(GR)和缓解(R)。评估两组间炎症指标的差异及其诊断效果。采用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)逻辑回归和多变量分析对独立诊断标记进行筛选,并分别构建相应的PCR和GR模态图。受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)和校正曲线评估模型的效率和准确性。决策曲线分析(DCA)和临床影响曲线分析(CIC)评估临床价值。此外,我们在内部用30%的随机患者样本验证了预测模型。结果:预后营养指数(PNI)预测PCR的临界值为53.585,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.720;GR的临界值为47.85,AUC为0.723;R的临界值为47.85,AUC为0.629。吸烟和PNI是PCR的独立预测因子,血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和PNI是GR的独立预测因子,PNI是r的独立预测因子。我们建立了基于PNI的诺图来预测PCR和GR,训练队列的AUC值分别为0.795和0.763,验证队列的AUC值分别为0.907和0.757。训练组和验证组校正曲线的预测结果和实际结果一致,Brier评分均低于0.25。结论:高PNI值是接受抗pd1 NICT的ESCC患者实现PCR、GR和R的共同独立预测因子。基于pni的诊断模型可以作为一种实用的工具来识别理想的患者进行个性化的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting pathological response of resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 with chemotherapy using serum inflammation indexes.

Background: Inflammatory indexes are increasingly being considered to predict treatment response in tumors. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of serum inflammatory indexes in predicting pathological response in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving anti-PD-1 neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT).

Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data from 116 ESCC patients who received NICT. We set three outcome variables: pathologic complete response (PCR), good response (GR), and response (R). We assessed between-group differences in inflammation indexes and their diagnostic efficacy. Independent diagnostic markers were filtered using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression and multivariable analysis, and the corresponding nomograms for PCR and GR were constructed, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) and calibration curves assessed the efficiency and accuracy of the models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curves (CIC) evaluated the clinical value. Moreover, we internally validated the predictive model with a random sample of 30% of patients.

Results: The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) predicted a cutoff value of 53.585 for PCR with an area under curve (AUC) value of 0.720, a cutoff value of 47.85 for GR with an AUC of 0.723, a cutoff value of 47.85 for R with an AUC of 0.629. Smoking and PNI were independent predictors of PCR, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and PNI were independent predictors of GR, and PNI was an independent predictor of R. We built PNI-based nomograms to predict PCR and GR with AUC values of 0.795 and 0.763 for the training cohort and 0.907 and 0.757 for the validation cohort, respectively. The predicted and actual results of the calibration curves for both the training and validation groups showed good agreement, with Brier scores below 0.25.

Conclusion: High PNI value is a shared independent predictor of achieving PCR, GR, and R in ESCC patients receiving anti-PD1 NICT. PNI-based diagnostic models can be used as a practical tool to identify ideal patients for personalized clinical decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信