{"title":"分数和非分数皮秒Nd:YAG激光联合分数皮秒KTP激光治疗中国女性黄褐斑。","authors":"Changhan Chen, Youhui Ke","doi":"10.1111/srt.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Melasma is a chronic pigmented lesion on the face that is challenging to treat. Single laser treatments are usually ineffective. Recently, picosecond lasers are becoming an emerging option for the treatment of melasma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional and non-fractional picosecond Nd:YAG lasers (PSNL) combined with fractional picosecond KTP laser (PSKL) on melasma in female Chinese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight Chinese patients with facial melasma were selected and divided into two groups. Every 4 weeks, each patient received one treatment, for a total of six treatments. Treatment was administered to 24 patients using fractional and non-fractional PSNL in the Nd:YAG group and fractional PSKL combined with fractional and non-fractional PSNL in the Nd:YAG+KTP group. Pain scores and adverse reactions were noted following each treatment, and the modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) and patient satisfaction were assessed 1 month following every two treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mMASI scores of both groups showed a considerable decline from the baseline. Following six treatments, the Nd:YAG+KTP group's mean mMASI score was 2.29 ± 0.82, while the Nd:YAG group was 2.87 ± 0.68. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). At every stage of the procedure, the Nd:YAG+KTP group experienced higher patient satisfaction than the Nd:YAG group. In comparison to the Nd:YAG group, which had a pain score of 2.75 (2.54, 3.00), the Nd:YAG+KTP group had a higher pain score of 3.00 (3.00, 3.17). During the study, no severe side effects were seen in the treated areas, including blisters, hypopigmentation, or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of fractional and non-fractional PSNL combined with fractional PSKL in the treatment of melasma is significantly better than that of using single wavelength fractional and non-fractional PSNL, with higher patient satisfaction and less adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21746,"journal":{"name":"Skin Research and Technology","volume":"31 8","pages":"e70177"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractional and Non-Fractional Picosecond Nd:YAG Lasers Combined With Fractional Picosecond KTP Laser for the Treatment of Melasma in Female Chinese.\",\"authors\":\"Changhan Chen, Youhui Ke\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/srt.70177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Melasma is a chronic pigmented lesion on the face that is challenging to treat. Single laser treatments are usually ineffective. Recently, picosecond lasers are becoming an emerging option for the treatment of melasma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional and non-fractional picosecond Nd:YAG lasers (PSNL) combined with fractional picosecond KTP laser (PSKL) on melasma in female Chinese.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-eight Chinese patients with facial melasma were selected and divided into two groups. Every 4 weeks, each patient received one treatment, for a total of six treatments. Treatment was administered to 24 patients using fractional and non-fractional PSNL in the Nd:YAG group and fractional PSKL combined with fractional and non-fractional PSNL in the Nd:YAG+KTP group. Pain scores and adverse reactions were noted following each treatment, and the modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) and patient satisfaction were assessed 1 month following every two treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mMASI scores of both groups showed a considerable decline from the baseline. Following six treatments, the Nd:YAG+KTP group's mean mMASI score was 2.29 ± 0.82, while the Nd:YAG group was 2.87 ± 0.68. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). At every stage of the procedure, the Nd:YAG+KTP group experienced higher patient satisfaction than the Nd:YAG group. In comparison to the Nd:YAG group, which had a pain score of 2.75 (2.54, 3.00), the Nd:YAG+KTP group had a higher pain score of 3.00 (3.00, 3.17). During the study, no severe side effects were seen in the treated areas, including blisters, hypopigmentation, or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The efficacy of fractional and non-fractional PSNL combined with fractional PSKL in the treatment of melasma is significantly better than that of using single wavelength fractional and non-fractional PSNL, with higher patient satisfaction and less adverse reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Skin Research and Technology\",\"volume\":\"31 8\",\"pages\":\"e70177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12314648/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Skin Research and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.70177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Skin Research and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/srt.70177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fractional and Non-Fractional Picosecond Nd:YAG Lasers Combined With Fractional Picosecond KTP Laser for the Treatment of Melasma in Female Chinese.
Background and objectives: Melasma is a chronic pigmented lesion on the face that is challenging to treat. Single laser treatments are usually ineffective. Recently, picosecond lasers are becoming an emerging option for the treatment of melasma. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional and non-fractional picosecond Nd:YAG lasers (PSNL) combined with fractional picosecond KTP laser (PSKL) on melasma in female Chinese.
Methods: Forty-eight Chinese patients with facial melasma were selected and divided into two groups. Every 4 weeks, each patient received one treatment, for a total of six treatments. Treatment was administered to 24 patients using fractional and non-fractional PSNL in the Nd:YAG group and fractional PSKL combined with fractional and non-fractional PSNL in the Nd:YAG+KTP group. Pain scores and adverse reactions were noted following each treatment, and the modified Melasma Area Severity Index (mMASI) and patient satisfaction were assessed 1 month following every two treatments.
Results: The mMASI scores of both groups showed a considerable decline from the baseline. Following six treatments, the Nd:YAG+KTP group's mean mMASI score was 2.29 ± 0.82, while the Nd:YAG group was 2.87 ± 0.68. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). At every stage of the procedure, the Nd:YAG+KTP group experienced higher patient satisfaction than the Nd:YAG group. In comparison to the Nd:YAG group, which had a pain score of 2.75 (2.54, 3.00), the Nd:YAG+KTP group had a higher pain score of 3.00 (3.00, 3.17). During the study, no severe side effects were seen in the treated areas, including blisters, hypopigmentation, or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH).
Conclusion: The efficacy of fractional and non-fractional PSNL combined with fractional PSKL in the treatment of melasma is significantly better than that of using single wavelength fractional and non-fractional PSNL, with higher patient satisfaction and less adverse reactions.
期刊介绍：
Skin Research and Technology is a clinically-oriented journal on biophysical methods and imaging techniques and how they are used in dermatology, cosmetology and plastic surgery for noninvasive quantification of skin structure and functions. Papers are invited on the development and validation of methods and their application in the characterization of diseased, abnormal and normal skin.
Topics include blood flow, colorimetry, thermography, evaporimetry, epidermal humidity, desquamation, profilometry, skin mechanics, epiluminiscence microscopy, high-frequency ultrasonography, confocal microscopy, digital imaging, image analysis and computerized evaluation and magnetic resonance. Noninvasive biochemical methods (such as lipids, keratin and tissue water) and the instrumental evaluation of cytological and histological samples are also covered.
The journal has a wide scope and aims to link scientists, clinical researchers and technicians through original articles, communications, editorials and commentaries, letters, reviews, announcements and news. Contributions should be clear, experimentally sound and novel.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
