妊娠期心理创伤的操作化:系统综述。

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Helena J V Rutherford, Kathryn M Wall, Lindsey Wallace Goldman, Jin Young Shin, Eloise H Novak, Amanda Lowell, Francesca Penner, Michèle J Day, Lea Papa, Drew Wright, Soudabeh Givrad
{"title":"妊娠期心理创伤的操作化:系统综述。","authors":"Helena J V Rutherford, Kathryn M Wall, Lindsey Wallace Goldman, Jin Young Shin, Eloise H Novak, Amanda Lowell, Francesca Penner, Michèle J Day, Lea Papa, Drew Wright, Soudabeh Givrad","doi":"10.1037/tra0001968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychological trauma can affect health and well-being across the lifespan but may be significantly impactful, with intergenerational consequences, during pregnancy. However, there appears to be no uniform agreement on the operationalization of psychological trauma in pregnancy. Such agreement is critical for the translation of research findings into clinical care. The purpose of this article was to provide narrative insight into the characterization of psychological trauma during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Literature searches were completed between July 2021 and September 2023 using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, relevant full-text articles, and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred seventy-six studies were identified that examined psychological trauma during pregnancy. Most assessments of psychological trauma used differing questionnaire-based approaches (79.7%), with variability in the timing of assessments administered and the type of psychological trauma measured. Only 15.8% of studies examined pregnancy-specific psychological trauma. Finally, just 24% of studies evidenced a comprehensive assessment of psychological trauma, with only 28.8% of studies assessing posttraumatic stress disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate significant variability in the conceptualization of psychological trauma during pregnancy. A more comprehensive assessment of psychological trauma beginning in the first trimester and repeated across the prenatal period is needed. Such an approach will be critical to the implementation of trauma-informed care to optimize the health and well-being of pregnant women and other perinatal individuals and their developing child and family. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operationalizing psychological trauma in pregnancy: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Helena J V Rutherford, Kathryn M Wall, Lindsey Wallace Goldman, Jin Young Shin, Eloise H Novak, Amanda Lowell, Francesca Penner, Michèle J Day, Lea Papa, Drew Wright, Soudabeh Givrad\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tra0001968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Psychological trauma can affect health and well-being across the lifespan but may be significantly impactful, with intergenerational consequences, during pregnancy. However, there appears to be no uniform agreement on the operationalization of psychological trauma in pregnancy. Such agreement is critical for the translation of research findings into clinical care. The purpose of this article was to provide narrative insight into the characterization of psychological trauma during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Literature searches were completed between July 2021 and September 2023 using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, relevant full-text articles, and extracted data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five hundred seventy-six studies were identified that examined psychological trauma during pregnancy. Most assessments of psychological trauma used differing questionnaire-based approaches (79.7%), with variability in the timing of assessments administered and the type of psychological trauma measured. Only 15.8% of studies examined pregnancy-specific psychological trauma. Finally, just 24% of studies evidenced a comprehensive assessment of psychological trauma, with only 28.8% of studies assessing posttraumatic stress disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings indicate significant variability in the conceptualization of psychological trauma during pregnancy. A more comprehensive assessment of psychological trauma beginning in the first trimester and repeated across the prenatal period is needed. Such an approach will be critical to the implementation of trauma-informed care to optimize the health and well-being of pregnant women and other perinatal individuals and their developing child and family. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12490802/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001968\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001968","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心理创伤可以影响整个生命周期的健康和福祉,但在怀孕期间可能会产生重大影响,并具有代际后果。然而,在怀孕期间心理创伤的操作化方面似乎没有统一的协议。这种一致对于将研究成果转化为临床护理至关重要。本文的目的是为怀孕期间心理创伤的表征提供叙事见解。方法:按照系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价。文献检索于2021年7月至2023年9月期间使用Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、APA PsycINFO和Cochrane完成。两名独立审稿人筛选摘要、相关全文文章和提取数据。结果:576项研究确定了怀孕期间的心理创伤。大多数心理创伤评估采用不同的基于问卷的方法(79.7%),评估时间和测量的心理创伤类型存在差异。只有15.8%的研究检查了怀孕特有的心理创伤。最后,只有24%的研究证明了对心理创伤的全面评估,只有28.8%的研究评估了创伤后应激障碍。结论:研究结果表明,怀孕期间心理创伤的概念化存在显著差异。一个更全面的心理创伤的评估开始在孕早期和重复整个产前期间是必要的。这种方法对于实施创伤知情护理至关重要,以优化孕妇和其他围产期个体及其发育中的儿童和家庭的健康和福祉。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operationalizing psychological trauma in pregnancy: A systematic review.

Objective: Psychological trauma can affect health and well-being across the lifespan but may be significantly impactful, with intergenerational consequences, during pregnancy. However, there appears to be no uniform agreement on the operationalization of psychological trauma in pregnancy. Such agreement is critical for the translation of research findings into clinical care. The purpose of this article was to provide narrative insight into the characterization of psychological trauma during pregnancy.

Method: A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Literature searches were completed between July 2021 and September 2023 using Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts, relevant full-text articles, and extracted data.

Results: Five hundred seventy-six studies were identified that examined psychological trauma during pregnancy. Most assessments of psychological trauma used differing questionnaire-based approaches (79.7%), with variability in the timing of assessments administered and the type of psychological trauma measured. Only 15.8% of studies examined pregnancy-specific psychological trauma. Finally, just 24% of studies evidenced a comprehensive assessment of psychological trauma, with only 28.8% of studies assessing posttraumatic stress disorder.

Conclusions: Findings indicate significant variability in the conceptualization of psychological trauma during pregnancy. A more comprehensive assessment of psychological trauma beginning in the first trimester and repeated across the prenatal period is needed. Such an approach will be critical to the implementation of trauma-informed care to optimize the health and well-being of pregnant women and other perinatal individuals and their developing child and family. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信